Literally no one thinks this way
The problem is when the strong independent woman becomes a requirement for a story
Quote from: IngloriousWho98 on June 12, 2016, 11:00:39 PMLiterally no one thinks this wayThe problem is when the strong independent woman becomes a requirement for a story pandering for the sake of pandering
Literally no one thinks this wayThe problem is when the strong independent woman becomes a requirement for a story
funny how a strong independent man is literally a requirement for every story, huh?
Quote from: SecondClass on June 12, 2016, 11:02:25 PMfunny how a strong independent man is literally a requirement for every story, huh?What?Who says that?What writers are doing is writing a strong human being, not writing some sexist statement to women You're literally saying "he's male so that's sexist"
Quote from: IngloriousWho98 on June 12, 2016, 11:10:58 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 12, 2016, 11:02:25 PMfunny how a strong independent man is literally a requirement for every story, huh?What?Who says that?What writers are doing is writing a strong human being, not writing some sexist statement to women You're literally saying "he's male so that's sexist"What? Literally every story has a strong protagonist who (usually) doesn't need to rely on others. It's an integral component to a good story, and no one has a problem with it when it's a dude. But you write in a strong female protagonist and all the redpillers come out of their caves and start bitching about SJWs.You said a strong, independent woman shouldn't be a requirement for a story, but if your protagonist is a woman, it is a requirement. If your protagonist is a man, then a strong, independent man is a requirement.
Quote from: SecondClass on June 12, 2016, 11:18:10 PMQuote from: IngloriousWho98 on June 12, 2016, 11:10:58 PMQuote from: SecondClass on June 12, 2016, 11:02:25 PMfunny how a strong independent man is literally a requirement for every story, huh?What?Who says that?What writers are doing is writing a strong human being, not writing some sexist statement to women You're literally saying "he's male so that's sexist"What? Literally every story has a strong protagonist who (usually) doesn't need to rely on others. It's an integral component to a good story, and no one has a problem with it when it's a dude. But you write in a strong female protagonist and all the redpillers come out of their caves and start bitching about SJWs.You said a strong, independent woman shouldn't be a requirement for a story, but if your protagonist is a woman, it is a requirement. If your protagonist is a man, then a strong, independent man is a requirement.No you dumbassWhat writers are creating is a strong character in generalGender has literally nothing to do with itWhat people are complaining about is when a strong independent woman character becomes an obligation for any story shoehorned in by whiny feministsBecause then, being a woman becomes the defining trait of that characterNo longer are we suppose to focus on her traits or background, we're supposed to focus on the fact that she's a woman
OP is triggered.
Even strong female leads get weak in the knees for Chad
Wasn't aware the number of people who actually believe that was big enough to actually care about.
Quote from: LC on June 12, 2016, 11:53:58 PMWasn't aware the number of people who actually believe that was big enough to actually care about.
I don't think this way.
Also you do know no one gives a fuck what your opinion is.
Quote from: Tsukuyomi Sabre on June 13, 2016, 01:32:08 AMAlso you do know no one gives a fuck what your opinion is.That road runs both ways.