Your thoughts on 9/11

XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,018 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
β€”Judge Aaron Satie
β€”β€”Carmen
I don't think the government did it themselves however I speculate that they did know that it was going to happen and didn't want to stop it because that was the excuse they needed to go to war and war = profit.
Well that's what happened in WWII at Pearl Harbor.
Yeah, this is a confirmed fact now, but if you would have brought the idea up 14 years after Pearl Harbor happened, people would call you a conspiracy nut and dismiss your opinion completely.

I'm seeing a parallel...


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
They could have nuked key military bases but instead attacked cities.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were key military targets. Military bases aren't just isolated in the middle of nowhere; they have cities built around them.

Would it have not been a more humane idea to destroy the military bases specifically with missiles rather than nuking the shit out of it?

That wasn't the point. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were used to demonstrate what the United States' new wonder weapon was capable of.

Exactly.


Turkey | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Viva Redemption
PSN: HurtfulTurkey
Steam: HurtfulTurkey
ID: HurtfulTurkey
IP: Logged

8,077 posts
 
They could have nuked key military bases but instead attacked cities.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were key military targets. Military bases aren't just isolated in the middle of nowhere; they have cities built around them.

Would it have not been a more humane idea to destroy the military bases specifically with missiles rather than nuking the shit out of it?

>missiles
>WWII

Why didn't they use smaller bombs, then? They did. They firebombed Tokyo to ash and it didn't work. The nukes were a display of force necessary to yield a surrender.


 
challengerX
| custom title
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: challengerX
IP: Logged

41,942 posts
I DONT GIVE A SINGLE -blam!- MOTHER -blam!-ER ITS A MOTHER -blam!-ING FORUM, OH WOW, YOU HAVE THE WORD NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, HOW MOTHER -blam!-ING COOL, NOT, YOUR ARE NOTHING TO ME BUT A BRAINWASHED PIECE OF SHIT BLOGGER, PEOPLE ONLY LIKE YOU BECAUSE YOU HAVE NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, SO PLEASE PUNCH YOURAELF IN THE FACE AND STAB YOUR EYE BECAUSE YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A PIECE OF SHIT OF SOCIETY
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.
Last Edit: September 10, 2015, 04:07:59 PM by challengerX


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
They could have nuked key military bases but instead attacked cities.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were key military targets. Military bases aren't just isolated in the middle of nowhere; they have cities built around them.

Would it have not been a more humane idea to destroy the military bases specifically with missiles rather than nuking the shit out of it?

>missiles
>WWII

Why didn't they use smaller bombs, then? They did. They firebombed Tokyo to ash and it didn't work. The nukes were a display of force necessary to yield a surrender.

Even if the nukes were a necessary evil, there was surely still some anticipation to see what it could do to people.


Doctor Doom | Mythic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Lord Keksworth
IP: Logged

7,368 posts
the one true God is Doctor Doom and we should all be worshiping him.
They could have nuked key military bases but instead attacked cities.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were key military targets. Military bases aren't just isolated in the middle of nowhere; they have cities built around them.

Would it have not been a more humane idea to destroy the military bases specifically with missiles rather than nuking the shit out of it?

That wasn't the point. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were used to demonstrate what the United States' new wonder weapon was capable of.

Exactly.

Let me rephrase that.

The cities weren't destroyed just to test the nukes, the cities were destroyed in order to force Japan to surrender for fear that America had more (which it didn't). And yes, more people would have died if they hadn't been used. It was a strategic decision that destroyed key military targets, they didn't just up and go 'let's bomb some fuckers real quick 'cuz we can'.


 
challengerX
| custom title
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: challengerX
IP: Logged

41,942 posts
I DONT GIVE A SINGLE -blam!- MOTHER -blam!-ER ITS A MOTHER -blam!-ING FORUM, OH WOW, YOU HAVE THE WORD NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, HOW MOTHER -blam!-ING COOL, NOT, YOUR ARE NOTHING TO ME BUT A BRAINWASHED PIECE OF SHIT BLOGGER, PEOPLE ONLY LIKE YOU BECAUSE YOU HAVE NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, SO PLEASE PUNCH YOURAELF IN THE FACE AND STAB YOUR EYE BECAUSE YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A PIECE OF SHIT OF SOCIETY
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
They could have nuked key military bases but instead attacked cities.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were key military targets. Military bases aren't just isolated in the middle of nowhere; they have cities built around them.

Would it have not been a more humane idea to destroy the military bases specifically with missiles rather than nuking the shit out of it?

>missiles
>WWII

Why didn't they use smaller bombs, then? They did. They firebombed Tokyo to ash and it didn't work. The nukes were a display of force necessary to yield a surrender.

But Japan had no allies. Its navy was basically destroyed, its islands were under a naval blockade and as you said, they were already performing intense bombings across cities. Surely a surrender was coming.


 
challengerX
| custom title
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: challengerX
IP: Logged

41,942 posts
I DONT GIVE A SINGLE -blam!- MOTHER -blam!-ER ITS A MOTHER -blam!-ING FORUM, OH WOW, YOU HAVE THE WORD NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, HOW MOTHER -blam!-ING COOL, NOT, YOUR ARE NOTHING TO ME BUT A BRAINWASHED PIECE OF SHIT BLOGGER, PEOPLE ONLY LIKE YOU BECAUSE YOU HAVE NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, SO PLEASE PUNCH YOURAELF IN THE FACE AND STAB YOUR EYE BECAUSE YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A PIECE OF SHIT OF SOCIETY
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


Doctor Doom | Mythic Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Lord Keksworth
IP: Logged

7,368 posts
the one true God is Doctor Doom and we should all be worshiping him.
They could have nuked key military bases but instead attacked cities.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were key military targets. Military bases aren't just isolated in the middle of nowhere; they have cities built around them.

Would it have not been a more humane idea to destroy the military bases specifically with missiles rather than nuking the shit out of it?

>missiles
>WWII

Why didn't they use smaller bombs, then? They did. They firebombed Tokyo to ash and it didn't work. The nukes were a display of force necessary to yield a surrender.

But Japan had no allies. Its navy was basically destroyed, its islands were under a naval blockade and as you said, they were already performing intense bombings across cities. Surely a surrender was coming.

Japan's entire philosophy at the time was fighting to the last man. Fuck no, they wouldn't have surrendered.

On the other hand, it's hard to say if they would have surrendered after the first atom bomb fell. They only had three days to consider before Nagasaki happened.


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
They could have nuked key military bases but instead attacked cities.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were key military targets. Military bases aren't just isolated in the middle of nowhere; they have cities built around them.

Would it have not been a more humane idea to destroy the military bases specifically with missiles rather than nuking the shit out of it?

>missiles
>WWII

Why didn't they use smaller bombs, then? They did. They firebombed Tokyo to ash and it didn't work. The nukes were a display of force necessary to yield a surrender.

But Japan had no allies. Its navy was basically destroyed, its islands were under a naval blockade and as you said, they were already performing intense bombings across cities. Surely a surrender was coming.
LOL

So, did the Japs really have that batshit never giving up morale were they thought Americans were all cannibals?

Because it is my understanding that they were already pretty deep in the shit.
Last Edit: September 10, 2015, 04:20:35 PM by Ascended Souls


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
They could have nuked key military bases but instead attacked cities.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were key military targets. Military bases aren't just isolated in the middle of nowhere; they have cities built around them.

Would it have not been a more humane idea to destroy the military bases specifically with missiles rather than nuking the shit out of it?

>missiles
>WWII

Why didn't they use smaller bombs, then? They did. They firebombed Tokyo to ash and it didn't work. The nukes were a display of force necessary to yield a surrender.

But Japan had no allies. Its navy was basically destroyed, its islands were under a naval blockade and as you said, they were already performing intense bombings across cities. Surely a surrender was coming.

Japan's entire philosophy at the time was fighting to the last man. Fuck no, they wouldn't have surrendered.

On the other hand, it's hard to say if they would have surrendered after the first atom bomb fell. They only had three days to consider before Nagasaki happened.

Yeah, I know that they were planning to drop another plutonium implosion bomb if they didn't surrender after Nagasaki.


Turkey | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Viva Redemption
PSN: HurtfulTurkey
Steam: HurtfulTurkey
ID: HurtfulTurkey
IP: Logged

8,077 posts
 
They could have nuked key military bases but instead attacked cities.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were key military targets. Military bases aren't just isolated in the middle of nowhere; they have cities built around them.

Would it have not been a more humane idea to destroy the military bases specifically with missiles rather than nuking the shit out of it?

>missiles
>WWII

Why didn't they use smaller bombs, then? They did. They firebombed Tokyo to ash and it didn't work. The nukes were a display of force necessary to yield a surrender.

But Japan had no allies. Its navy was basically destroyed, its islands were under a naval blockade and as you said, they were already performing intense bombings across cities. Surely a surrender was coming.

Yeah, there are so many quotes from politicians saying Japan would've surrendered.

After the Dresden bombings, surely Japan would surrender.
After their allies Germany and Italy surrendered, surely Japan would surrender.
After the U.S. firebombed Tokyo and dozens of other cities, surely Japan was ready to surrender.
After the blockade and defeat of the Japanese navy, then Japan was obviously just about to surrender.
After the warnings of imminent destruction, Japan definitely was right on the brink of surrendering.
After the first nuclear weapon was used against them, Japan was literally days away from surrendering.

After the second nuke was used, it took Japan a week and a half to announce their surrender. Their culture was one that would have willingly died for no reason at all, if the emperor asked. The people begged the emperor to surrender because they feared for his life, not because they didn't want to die themselves.


The Lord Slide Rule | Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: MrMeatyMeatball
PSN:
Steam: SexyPiranha
ID: SexyPiranha
IP: Logged

4,306 posts
My stupidity is self evident.
10/10

Would Allahu ackbar again.


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
They could have nuked key military bases but instead attacked cities.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were key military targets. Military bases aren't just isolated in the middle of nowhere; they have cities built around them.

Would it have not been a more humane idea to destroy the military bases specifically with missiles rather than nuking the shit out of it?

>missiles
>WWII

Why didn't they use smaller bombs, then? They did. They firebombed Tokyo to ash and it didn't work. The nukes were a display of force necessary to yield a surrender.

But Japan had no allies. Its navy was basically destroyed, its islands were under a naval blockade and as you said, they were already performing intense bombings across cities. Surely a surrender was coming.

Yeah, there are so many quotes from politicians saying Japan would've surrendered.

After the Dresden bombings, surely Japan would surrender.
After their allies Germany and Italy surrendered, surely Japan would surrender.
After the U.S. firebombed Tokyo and dozens of other cities, surely Japan was ready to surrender.
After the blockade and defeat of the Japanese navy, then Japan was obviously just about to surrender.
After the warnings of imminent destruction, Japan definitely was right on the brink of surrendering.
After the first nuclear weapon was used against them, Japan was literally days away from surrendering.

After the second nuke was used, it took Japan a week and a half to announce their surrender. Their culture was one that would have willingly died for no reason at all, if the emperor asked. The people begged the emperor to surrender because they feared for his life, not because they didn't want to die themselves.

Japan wanted to surrender. Hirohito was advised multiple times to surrender. The emperor was a delusional fool that refused to admit defeat. Without nukes, it was extremely likely for Japan to surrender before the invasion planned on November 1st.
Last Edit: September 10, 2015, 04:34:56 PM by Ascended Souls


Turkey | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Viva Redemption
PSN: HurtfulTurkey
Steam: HurtfulTurkey
ID: HurtfulTurkey
IP: Logged

8,077 posts
 
Japan wanted to surrender. Hirohito was advised multiple times to surrender. The emperor was a delusional fool that refused to admit defeat. Without nukes, it was extremely likely for Japan to surrender before the invasion planned on November 1st.
It was the opposite, actually. Japanese military leadership consistently refused to surrender unconditionally because they wanted Hirohito to remain in power.

And saying that they would have surrendered is all well and good, but they had almost 4 months after being 'defeated' to surrender, and they repeatedly refused. It's not like they were asking to surrender but the U.S. just blew them off.


aREALgod | Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: aTALLmidget
IP: Logged

5,169 posts
 
9/11 conspiracies are some of the dumbest and most easily disproven theories around, but it's the people who believe in them that are headstrong and more akin to a wall in a debate than a person. Also lol wtf is this shit about the nukes in WWII? The gooks got nuked and for a good reason, case closed


 
DAS B00T x2
| Cultural Appropriator
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: DAS B00T x2
IP: Logged

37,627 posts
This is not the greatest sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
So it this just four pages of OP being a "truther"?

You know, in a semi-enclosed environment, jet-A can melt steel.


Jocephalopod | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: joecephalopod
PSN:
Steam: j0cephalopod
ID: Jocephalopod
IP: Logged

8,352 posts
 
some people i knew died


Jocephalopod | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: joecephalopod
PSN:
Steam: j0cephalopod
ID: Jocephalopod
IP: Logged

8,352 posts
 
some local NY footage

YouTube


Jocephalopod | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: joecephalopod
PSN:
Steam: j0cephalopod
ID: Jocephalopod
IP: Logged

8,352 posts
 
YouTube


Winy | Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: Phasenectar
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Winy
IP: Logged

3,164 posts
 
Quote
I also showed you a video on thermite reactions to compare it to the image. It looks pretty similar. Perhaps thermite charges were placed around key points in the buildings structure?

The "motherfucking plane on fire" as you so eloquently put it could have ignited the thermite.
You posted a fucking still-framed image of sparks coming out of a burning building that had just been hit with an airliner.

WHOA MUST BE THERMITE, BECAUSE THERMITE ALSO SPARKS

Timestamp says 9:52am on the image. The planes hit at 9:03am. This was a good 55 minutes after the planes hit.
Pretty sure long after a plane impact, let alone under an hour, various things can continue to break, bend, spark, and cripple under the stress of the impact and damage. This is a plane we're talking about. A 767, filled with electronics, fuel, and various other flammable substances, crashing into a building filled with wires, things with wires, and mechanical parts. You have zero experience with this type of forensics. It's completely out of your league. It's out of mine, too, but I'm very sure that every materials scientist or chemist would be blowing their load at the sight of these pictures if it was so obviously the work of thermite. I'm pretty sure you're just messing with me, honestly.

I'm not saying that it was thermite, but it looks like it. Did you even watch the video I posted? Thermite burns for a long, long time if it has a lot of metal to eat through.

And yeah, no, I'm not messing with you. So sorry for having a different perspective.
Your perspective is ridiculous, and it's incredibly easy to demonstrate why. You very likely don't "Know a little about thermite reactions" anymore than any other person in this thread. What credentials do you have? Are you a chemist? A materials scientist? And how could you possibly support such a ridiculous idea that nobody else, specifically experts in the fields required to analyze this type of destruction, seems to be a proponent of?

Your supposedly fantastic and convincing video shows a chemical reaction where, big surprise, something burns for an extended period of time. So would a building and the various different materials in it that just got rammed into by a 150-ton fuselage of jet fuel and electronics. Playing "Devil's advocate" doesn't negate that what you're saying is beyond stupid, and you are continuing to defend it.
Last Edit: September 10, 2015, 06:24:56 PM by Winy


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
Quote
I also showed you a video on thermite reactions to compare it to the image. It looks pretty similar. Perhaps thermite charges were placed around key points in the buildings structure?

The "motherfucking plane on fire" as you so eloquently put it could have ignited the thermite.
You posted a fucking still-framed image of sparks coming out of a burning building that had just been hit with an airliner.

WHOA MUST BE THERMITE, BECAUSE THERMITE ALSO SPARKS

Timestamp says 9:52am on the image. The planes hit at 9:03am. This was a good 55 minutes after the planes hit.
Pretty sure long after a plane impact, let alone under an hour, various things can continue to break, bend, spark, and cripple under the stress of the impact and damage. This is a plane we're talking about. A 767, filled with electronics, fuel, and various other flammable substances, crashing into a building filled with wires, things with wires, and mechanical parts. You have zero experience with this type of forensics. It's completely out of your league. It's out of mine, too, but I'm very sure that every materials scientist or chemist would be blowing their load at the sight of these pictures if it was so obviously the work of thermite. I'm pretty sure you're just messing with me, honestly.

I'm not saying that it was thermite, but it looks like it. Did you even watch the video I posted? Thermite burns for a long, long time if it has a lot of metal to eat through.

And yeah, no, I'm not messing with you. So sorry for having a different perspective.
Your perspective is ridiculous, and it's incredibly easy to demonstrate why. You don't very likely don't "Know a little about thermite reactions" anymore than any other person in this thread. What credentials do you have? Are you a chemist? A materials scientist? And how could you possibly support such a ridiculous idea that nobody else, specifically experts in the fields required to analyze this type of destruction, seems to be a proponent of?

Your supposedly fantastic and convincing video shows a chemical reaction where, big surprise, something burns for an extended period of time. So would a building and the various different materials in it that just got rammed into by a 150-ton fuselage of jet fuel and electronics. Playing "Devil's advocate" doesn't negate that what you're saying is beyond stupid, and you are continuing to defend it.

It was already debunked and I stopped defending it, so you can just go ahead and kindly drop it, thanks.





maverick | Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Maverick
IP: Logged

4,298 posts
 
what actually happened still remains unclear


Winy | Legendary Invincible!
 
more |
XBL: Phasenectar
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Winy
IP: Logged

3,164 posts
 
Quote
I also showed you a video on thermite reactions to compare it to the image. It looks pretty similar. Perhaps thermite charges were placed around key points in the buildings structure?

The "motherfucking plane on fire" as you so eloquently put it could have ignited the thermite.
You posted a fucking still-framed image of sparks coming out of a burning building that had just been hit with an airliner.

WHOA MUST BE THERMITE, BECAUSE THERMITE ALSO SPARKS

Timestamp says 9:52am on the image. The planes hit at 9:03am. This was a good 55 minutes after the planes hit.
Pretty sure long after a plane impact, let alone under an hour, various things can continue to break, bend, spark, and cripple under the stress of the impact and damage. This is a plane we're talking about. A 767, filled with electronics, fuel, and various other flammable substances, crashing into a building filled with wires, things with wires, and mechanical parts. You have zero experience with this type of forensics. It's completely out of your league. It's out of mine, too, but I'm very sure that every materials scientist or chemist would be blowing their load at the sight of these pictures if it was so obviously the work of thermite. I'm pretty sure you're just messing with me, honestly.

I'm not saying that it was thermite, but it looks like it. Did you even watch the video I posted? Thermite burns for a long, long time if it has a lot of metal to eat through.

And yeah, no, I'm not messing with you. So sorry for having a different perspective.
Your perspective is ridiculous, and it's incredibly easy to demonstrate why. You don't very likely don't "Know a little about thermite reactions" anymore than any other person in this thread. What credentials do you have? Are you a chemist? A materials scientist? And how could you possibly support such a ridiculous idea that nobody else, specifically experts in the fields required to analyze this type of destruction, seems to be a proponent of?

Your supposedly fantastic and convincing video shows a chemical reaction where, big surprise, something burns for an extended period of time. So would a building and the various different materials in it that just got rammed into by a 150-ton fuselage of jet fuel and electronics. Playing "Devil's advocate" doesn't negate that what you're saying is beyond stupid, and you are continuing to defend it.

It was already debunked and I stopped defending it, so you can just go ahead and kindly drop it, thanks.
lol

It was debunked on the first page.


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
Quote
I also showed you a video on thermite reactions to compare it to the image. It looks pretty similar. Perhaps thermite charges were placed around key points in the buildings structure?

The "motherfucking plane on fire" as you so eloquently put it could have ignited the thermite.
You posted a fucking still-framed image of sparks coming out of a burning building that had just been hit with an airliner.

WHOA MUST BE THERMITE, BECAUSE THERMITE ALSO SPARKS

Timestamp says 9:52am on the image. The planes hit at 9:03am. This was a good 55 minutes after the planes hit.
Pretty sure long after a plane impact, let alone under an hour, various things can continue to break, bend, spark, and cripple under the stress of the impact and damage. This is a plane we're talking about. A 767, filled with electronics, fuel, and various other flammable substances, crashing into a building filled with wires, things with wires, and mechanical parts. You have zero experience with this type of forensics. It's completely out of your league. It's out of mine, too, but I'm very sure that every materials scientist or chemist would be blowing their load at the sight of these pictures if it was so obviously the work of thermite. I'm pretty sure you're just messing with me, honestly.

I'm not saying that it was thermite, but it looks like it. Did you even watch the video I posted? Thermite burns for a long, long time if it has a lot of metal to eat through.

And yeah, no, I'm not messing with you. So sorry for having a different perspective.
Your perspective is ridiculous, and it's incredibly easy to demonstrate why. You don't very likely don't "Know a little about thermite reactions" anymore than any other person in this thread. What credentials do you have? Are you a chemist? A materials scientist? And how could you possibly support such a ridiculous idea that nobody else, specifically experts in the fields required to analyze this type of destruction, seems to be a proponent of?

Your supposedly fantastic and convincing video shows a chemical reaction where, big surprise, something burns for an extended period of time. So would a building and the various different materials in it that just got rammed into by a 150-ton fuselage of jet fuel and electronics. Playing "Devil's advocate" doesn't negate that what you're saying is beyond stupid, and you are continuing to defend it.

It was already debunked and I stopped defending it, so you can just go ahead and kindly drop it, thanks.
lol

It was debunked on the first page.

lol

I really don't care anymore. It's finished.


 
 
Flee
| Marty Forum Ninja
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: Flee
IP: Logged

15,686 posts
 
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


 
Naru
| The Tide Caller
 
more |
XBL: Naru No Baka
PSN:
Steam: The Tide Caller
ID: GasaiYuno
IP: Logged

18,501 posts
The Rage....
I don't think the government did it themselves however I speculate that they did know that it was going to happen and didn't want to stop it because that was the excuse they needed to go to war and war = profit.
war is profitable, what we're doing in afghanistan and shit isnt.


 
challengerX
| custom title
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: challengerX
IP: Logged

41,942 posts
I DONT GIVE A SINGLE -blam!- MOTHER -blam!-ER ITS A MOTHER -blam!-ING FORUM, OH WOW, YOU HAVE THE WORD NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, HOW MOTHER -blam!-ING COOL, NOT, YOUR ARE NOTHING TO ME BUT A BRAINWASHED PIECE OF SHIT BLOGGER, PEOPLE ONLY LIKE YOU BECAUSE YOU HAVE NINJA BELOW YOUR NAME, SO PLEASE PUNCH YOURAELF IN THE FACE AND STAB YOUR EYE BECAUSE YOU ARE NOTHING BUT A PIECE OF SHIT OF SOCIETY
This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.


rC | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: RC5908
IP: Logged

10,787 posts
ayy lmao
It didn't happen. 2001 was a reverse leap year, with the skipped day being September 11th. I thought this was common knowledge.