>The US should annex Canada.
- No reduce sentences or plea bargains for murderers, rapists, and other scum
>The government shouldn't have bailed out any of the automotive or banking companies.
Good question. Probably people who are retired and do not benefit from certain market strategies to help eliminate bias. Scientific economists would be most preferable.
There's probably economists out there who want the whole of society to benefit who wouldn't put an emphasis on one group of people.
How about no reduced sentences for anyone? It kinda invalidates the whole point of sentences if you can get around it.
Hue W0T M80?!
Stopped reading there.
- Anti-EU- Anti-UN (in it's current form)- Pro-NATO (this was controversial with all the hippies that want to see us get invaded lol)- Pro-federalised military of the British commonwealth (fuck you sjw faggots and your white guilt)- Pro-lower, flatter tax rate- Pro-abolishment of the welfare state- Pro-less government interference in business- Pro-private parties right to discriminate- Pro-fucking free speech and the abolishment of our current basis for thought crime laws.- Anti-Anglo/Amero special relationship (they only seem to want us to do stuff that hurts the power of the British nation without equal compensation)- Pro-nukes- Pro-nuclear power- Pro-military- Pro-commonwealth and British legacy (again, go fuck yourselves sjw)I can't think of anymore right now.
I don't necessarily agree with all of those, but I like the overall tone of it >.>
I think I left one out...> Anti-SJW
Sold.But still, I don't agree with all of them <.<
I never asked you to. I'd be interested to know which ones you disagree with though.
>want out of EU because muh sovereignty>hey canada, australia and NZ, we want to control your military pls gib nao :DDDDDD-the british right-wing in a nutshell
> arguing that a federalised military is the same as a political unionAre you retarded?