Are we still not discussing delegating more power to the states in order to lessen Congress' influence over everyone? I mean, each state might as well be its own country (especially when it comes to culture). Part of me is glad that government will be expanding a little bit slower over the next few years, but part of me is outraged because "deregulation" is being forced on people.
Power to the states is exactly how we have been keeping gay marriage illegal in many states.
the one true God is Doctor Doom and we should all be worshiping him.
Quote from: bang bang on November 09, 2014, 04:10:26 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on November 09, 2014, 04:03:45 PMIt's a shame, really.No shame in the democratic process. It's what people want.People can be quite easily wrong.
Quote from: Meta Cognition on November 09, 2014, 04:03:45 PMIt's a shame, really.No shame in the democratic process. It's what people want.
It's a shame, really.
Quote from: Iberian Husky on November 11, 2014, 12:23:57 PMI'll give it to Romney, he was a good governor.
Because Republicans simply make better governors than Democrats do. Example: I live in Massachusetts. When Romney was governor, he lowered taxes, fixed a lot of the infrastructure, and got shit done. When Deval (Dem) got elected, he sat on his ass and raised taxes all day, didn't get any shit done, gave more tax money to welfare abusers, attempted to fill my town with shitty illegal Guatemalan refugees and basically acted like Obama's bum buddy. He was an objectively shitty. Now that Charlie Baker, a Republican is elected, I expect him to lower taxes and crack down on welfare abuse. Maybe even get out infastructure fixed up too.
Republicans own the House, Senate, and governorship.
