A violation to her right to privacy — “a man used the locker room while Mrs. Cormier was using the locker room” — that caused her “embarrassment, humiliation, and severe emotional distress.” A loss of gym facilities, fear about using the gym facilities, embarrassment and humiliation, severe emotional distress, damage to reputation, and “all other damages that reasonably flow from Defendants’ outrageous behavior.” “Conduct and communication of a sexual nature.” Wrongful termination of membership agreement and breach of contract. The following “exemplary damages”: “aggravation, annoyance, discomfort, disgrace, feelings of oppression, humiliation, inconvenience, indignation, insult, mental anxiety, mental suffering, mortification, outrage, scorn, shame, sorrow, vexation, and worry.”
Jesus tittyfucking Christ.
aggravation, annoyance, discomfort, disgrace, feelings of oppression, humiliation, inconvenience, indignation, insult, mental anxiety, mental suffering, mortification, outrage, scorn, shame, sorrow, vexation, and worry
Cormier’s representation by Kallman Legal Group is likely not a coincidence. David and Stephen Kallman, a father and son team, already have a reputation for opposing LGBT equality in Michigan. In October of 2013, they submitted a legal memo challenging proposed LGBT nondiscrimination protections in Delta Township, claiming that the ordinance would violate others’ religious freedom. The memo compared homosexuality to extramarital sex, polygamy, pedophilia, serial killer rapists, necrophilia, bestiality, and incest and suggested that because gender identity is “internal to the person,” someone accused of discrimination would be required to be a “mind-reader” not to discriminate. Their suit against Planet Fitness for respecting how individuals self-identify their gender seems to disprove this last concern.In addition to his legal practice, David Kallman serves on the board of the Colorado-based Salt and Light Global ministries, which believes the Bible is infallible and seeks to impose God’s law “in every social sphere in every community.” Both Kallmans also serve as legal counsel for the Great Lakes Justice Center, which has published issue briefs similarly rejecting LGBT protections as a violation of religious liberty and describing such laws as an attempt to promote “civil acceptance of homosexual conduct through the force of law.”
QuoteCormier’s representation by Kallman Legal Group is likely not a coincidence. David and Stephen Kallman, a father and son team, already have a reputation for opposing LGBT equality in Michigan. In October of 2013, they submitted a legal memo challenging proposed LGBT nondiscrimination protections in Delta Township, claiming that the ordinance would violate others’ religious freedom. The memo compared homosexuality to extramarital sex, polygamy, pedophilia, serial killer rapists, necrophilia, bestiality, and incest and suggested that because gender identity is “internal to the person,” someone accused of discrimination would be required to be a “mind-reader” not to discriminate. Their suit against Planet Fitness for respecting how individuals self-identify their gender seems to disprove this last concern.In addition to his legal practice, David Kallman serves on the board of the Colorado-based Salt and Light Global ministries, which believes the Bible is infallible and seeks to impose God’s law “in every social sphere in every community.” Both Kallmans also serve as legal counsel for the Great Lakes Justice Center, which has published issue briefs similarly rejecting LGBT protections as a violation of religious liberty and describing such laws as an attempt to promote “civil acceptance of homosexual conduct through the force of law.”People really think these things.
The memo compared homosexuality to extramarital sex, polygamy, pedophilia, serial killer rapists, necrophilia, bestiality, and incest and suggested that because gender identity is “internal to the person,” someone accused of discrimination would be required to be a “mind-reader” not to discriminate.
Wow better grab my lip gloss and sun dress so I can "work out".
Quote from: Sly Instinct on March 24, 2015, 01:09:31 PMWow better grab my lip gloss and sun dress so I can "work out".I'm not sure what this comment is even supposed to mean. Are you saying you're going to "pretend" to be trans so you can peep on the ladies in the locker room?
Quote from: Mad Max on March 24, 2015, 01:22:10 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on March 24, 2015, 01:09:31 PMWow better grab my lip gloss and sun dress so I can "work out".I'm not sure what this comment is even supposed to mean. Are you saying you're going to "pretend" to be trans so you can peep on the ladies in the locker room?Yeah.
Quote from: Sly Instinct on March 24, 2015, 02:08:43 PMQuote from: Mad Max on March 24, 2015, 01:22:10 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on March 24, 2015, 01:09:31 PMWow better grab my lip gloss and sun dress so I can "work out".I'm not sure what this comment is even supposed to mean. Are you saying you're going to "pretend" to be trans so you can peep on the ladies in the locker room?Yeah.If you need to resort to pretending to be trans in order to see a naked woman I have some serious questions about the health of your social life.
Wait, so the lady didn't like a MALE in her locker room? I don't blame her.
Quote from: PSU on March 24, 2015, 09:33:02 PMWait, so the lady didn't like a MALE in her locker room? I don't blame her.Oh god...inb4hatetrainAnd it's funny how politicized your comment is.
Quote from: GethKhilafah on March 24, 2015, 09:35:07 PMQuote from: PSU on March 24, 2015, 09:33:02 PMWait, so the lady didn't like a MALE in her locker room? I don't blame her.Oh god...inb4hatetrainAnd it's funny how politicized your comment is.Politicized? Just my beliefs bro. You're born a male, have a dick and balls, you're a man. Just accept it. And allowing a Male (whether hes in a dress or not) shouldn't be going into a womans locker room. If anything, I'd be for advocating an "other" labeled bathroom or locker room. Is this something worth suing over? No. But its still pretty fucked up that it happened at all.
Quote from: PSU on March 24, 2015, 09:41:52 PMQuote from: GethKhilafah on March 24, 2015, 09:35:07 PMQuote from: PSU on March 24, 2015, 09:33:02 PMWait, so the lady didn't like a MALE in her locker room? I don't blame her.Oh god...inb4hatetrainAnd it's funny how politicized your comment is.Politicized? Just my beliefs bro. You're born a male, have a dick and balls, you're a man. Just accept it. And allowing a Male (whether hes in a dress or not) shouldn't be going into a womans locker room. If anything, I'd be for advocating an "other" labeled bathroom or locker room. Is this something worth suing over? No. But its still pretty fucked up that it happened at all.Didn't you read the exemplary damages including “aggravation, annoyance, discomfort, disgrace, feelings of oppression, humiliation, inconvenience, indignation, insult, mental anxiety, mental suffering, mortification, outrage, scorn, shame, sorrow, vexation, and worry.”This woman is a fucking nutjob. No normal person would react like that if they saw a male in a bathroom.
feelings of oppression,
Be a misogynist or misandrist and people go mad at you, be too equal, and people will be mad at you. People are never happy.
Why is PSU even allowed in Serious?