Isn't it inherently sexist to disregard or think less of somebodies opinion because of their gender?
Quote from: Word Wizard on May 23, 2016, 07:21:56 AMIt was because men and women agreed with the argument that everyone deserves bodily autonomy.Not sure what world you're living in, but the fact it's against the law to do drugs, infants are circumcised, and a person cannot attempt suicide without the legal system trying to deter it from happening show that the US doesn't give the slightest fuck about bodily autonomy.
It was because men and women agreed with the argument that everyone deserves bodily autonomy.
Quote from: Tyger on May 23, 2016, 10:19:28 AMIsn't it inherently sexist to disregard or think less of somebodies opinion because of their gender?I think it's sexist in the same way that dividing men and women at the Olympics is sexist. You could argue that it's sexist, but it's also fair, because women would get wrecked in every single event, because men are just more physically able than women are, as a biological fact.It's also a biological fact that cisgendered men have never been cisgendered women, and therefore cannot know what it's like to be pregnant. Some might find it silly for someone to have an opinion on pregnancy when they haven't been pregnant themselves, or don't even have the ability to become pregnant.I'm sure there's better examples out there--that's why I made the thread.