I can't tell if you're serious.

You must be able to see the danger in allowing the government to choose who can or cannot vote beyond the imprisoned and legitimately insane. Not to mention, the concept of "good" and "bad" policies is often negligible, since differing values often precede conclusions. Most Republicans don't want environmental legislation because of its potential impact on the economy, not because they think eco-fascists are trying to impose a communist regime.

Not to mention, most othet examples aren't as clear cut, especially when it comes to economics. Do we rule out the people who want a gold standard, or a gift society, considering such ideas are pretty bankrupt in intellectual circles? What about people who define fairness as proportionality instead of equality? Or those who value tradition over liberty?