One candidate is actively belligerent toward Russia, and represents the greatest enemy of Putin's pluralist ideologyThe other would rather engage in a less aggressive and invasive foreign policyGEE I WONDER WHICH ONE THE RUSSIANS WILL BACK UPCLEARLY THEY JUST WANT TO UNDERMINE OUR PRECIOUS DEMOCRACYNEVERMIND US MEDIA VILIFYING PUTIN EVERY RUSSIAN ELECTION CYCLE AND ACCUSING HIM OF ASSASSINATION AND VARIOUS OTHER UNHUMANIST SINSGOD (secular agnostic deistic god, not the bossy Christian god) BLESS COCA COLA AND WALMART AND DEMOCRACY
Quote from: Grozny on August 19, 2016, 02:14:48 PMOne candidate is actively belligerent toward Russia, and represents the greatest enemy of Putin's pluralist ideologyThe other would rather engage in a less aggressive and invasive foreign policyGEE I WONDER WHICH ONE THE RUSSIANS WILL BACK UPCLEARLY THEY JUST WANT TO UNDERMINE OUR PRECIOUS DEMOCRACYNEVERMIND US MEDIA VILIFYING PUTIN EVERY RUSSIAN ELECTION CYCLE AND ACCUSING HIM OF ASSASSINATION AND VARIOUS OTHER UNHUMANIST SINSGOD (secular agnostic deistic god, not the bossy Christian god) BLESS COCA COLA AND WALMART AND DEMOCRACYPaul Manafort has actively been in cahoots with Russia for years though, and Trump risks isolating our allies just to be in better terms with Russia? Saying Nato allies have to pony up so Russia doesn't invade and take over in someway? Yeah, it's a little fishy. Wanting better relations with a country you're not on good terms with is fine, but at the risk of isolating your own allies, and disrupting the only alliance really opposing increased Russian aggression, it's not worth it.
NATO does need to get its shit together though.