Every human being deserves a say in the decisions that affect their lives and not be subject to the will of another. Therefore, we will work to increase public participation at every level of government and to ensure that our public representatives are fully accountable to the people who elect them. We will also work to create new types of political organizations which expand the process of participatory democracy by directly including citizens in the decision-making process.

I don't see the problem.

This is how naive libertarians actually are.

we will work to increase public participation at every level of government

which expand the process of participatory democracy by directly including citizens in the decision-making process

Still not seeing how that translates to more state power.

No, because under this system citizens would have a say in how things are run, as opposed to being dependent on the whims of an insular ruling class.

That equals less power for the state, not more.

For the rich, yes. For everyone else the problem is too few points of access.

I suppose you could make the argument that rich people will end up controlling the system regardless, but the obvious solution to that problem would be to do away with capitalism.

Even without corporate welfare, you would still have to take into account lobbying, campaign donations, and privately-owned mass media.

So long as all of those institutions remain in place, elections will always be rigged to the advantage of the corporate plutocracy.

Not really, corporations will always have incentive to support politicians that are in favour of legislation that benefits them.

As for the media? Oh well, first amendment. There's a broad range of information available from a number of sources, if you don't like it then you're perfectly free to look elsewhere for information.

Inheritance tax should be abolished; it hurts the middle-class the most. Countries like Sweden have done fine without it.

Then this kind of attitude isn't conducive to getting rid of it.

And replace it with what? Socialism? Communism? First off human nature is to be greedy, just look at the nations that called themselves Communist (Cuba, China, Vietnam, North Korea, Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc nations, etc) they all fell victim to a few elite taking control of the nation and wealth and treating the people like shit but utilized brainwashing to make them think they were living a good life. Not only was life terrible under these systems but goods and services were shit also as there were no companies competing to drive innovation, quality improvement, cheap prices, etc. Because human nature is to want things (being greedy) it's the very reason why capitalism, and capitalistic-like systems, have always flourished, it allows everybody to want instead of a small few who then turn to controlling the masses

I would argue that the problem with all those countries is that the state wrested control of the means of production away from the workers after the revolution.

And as shitty as Cuba is, it's still a much better place to live than most South American countries.