No, the point is not a normative, but a descriptive one. The rapists should be completely morally and legally accountable for their actions. It seems obvious to suggest, however, that as the vulnerability of women declines so would the level of rapes. That's the only point being made.
From the eyes of a judge, that point shouldn't be relevant. A judge's duty is to rule in accordance with the law, not make arbitrary value judgments on what the victim was doing at the time the crime was committed.
I don't know if there is a statistic
Because unlike your lazy begging ass I did a Google search before posting and didn't like the fact that some said there was correlation and some said there weren't. So I gave my opinion on it after saying I don't know if there is a valid and trustworthy statistic that isn't just pushing some agenda. It's a forum. People come here to talk. We're not your servants and we're not here to make your life easy. Do some research or accept the fact that I have my opinion to give because you brought it up. I didn't even state it as if it were fact, I just said what I thought was most logical. So yes, you're being an asshole. You were being hostile the entire thread, and you're hostile in most every other thread. You're incredibly arrogant. Take a step back and shut the fuck up if you don't have anything important to say. Don't ask us something while we're having a friendly discussion then go postal on somebody who says they don't know if there's a statistic but they assume such and such. If you don't want a conversation in the first place, why ask the question? Why not look it up?
Nobody cares. We all know you're just an alt of Kinder. Shut up.
Quote from: Weed Commando on August 26, 2014, 06:55:15 PMNobody cares. We all know you're just an alt of Kinder. Shut up.Joke's on you, I'm actually lonepaul.
[citation needed]