I knew it was low, but three? Fuck me. That's awful.
Right? I think that number is hilarious in contrast to the picture that [American] conservatives like to paint of Obama being some iron-fisted ruler who won't let anything pass.
Quote from: Mad Max on February 24, 2015, 05:09:46 PMRight? I think that number is hilarious in contrast to the picture that [American] conservatives like to paint of Obama being some iron-fisted ruler who won't let anything pass.I really don't get why conservatives hate the use of vetoes. I mean, vetoes are a good thing, they temper the excesses of the legislature; the two biggest vetoers post-Kennedy were Ford and Reagan. I'd criticise Obama for not using the veto enough. But conservatives who hate the use of vetoes in the first place? Yeah, they're probably fucking worse.
Quote from: Meta Cognition on February 24, 2015, 05:13:18 PMQuote from: Mad Max on February 24, 2015, 05:09:46 PMRight? I think that number is hilarious in contrast to the picture that [American] conservatives like to paint of Obama being some iron-fisted ruler who won't let anything pass.I really don't get why conservatives hate the use of vetoes. I mean, vetoes are a good thing, they temper the excesses of the legislature; the two biggest vetoers post-Kennedy were Ford and Reagan. I'd criticise Obama for not using the veto enough. But conservatives who hate the use of vetoes in the first place? Yeah, they're probably fucking worse.They were kissing Bush Junior's feet when he vetoed just about every damn thing in sight. It's just that when Obama does it, it's the end of the fucking world.
So in other words.. Obama allowed more shit to pass. We need a topic about all the things he DID sign or allowed to pass. You can't possibly tell me during his whole presidency, only three bills were shit.
For illuminati fans, it's good to note that Warren Buffett was against the pipeline because he owns railroads currently used to transport oil. It's more expensive and far more dangerous than the pipeline, but at least we're saving the environment, right?
Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on February 25, 2015, 07:48:17 AMFor illuminati fans, it's good to note that Warren Buffett was against the pipeline because he owns railroads currently used to transport oil. It's more expensive and far more dangerous than the pipeline, but at least we're saving the environment, right?That's not even an Illuminati thing - that's just capitalism.
Quote from: Mad Max on February 25, 2015, 10:00:55 AMQuote from: HurtfulTurkey on February 25, 2015, 07:48:17 AMFor illuminati fans, it's good to note that Warren Buffett was against the pipeline because he owns railroads currently used to transport oil. It's more expensive and far more dangerous than the pipeline, but at least we're saving the environment, right?That's not even an Illuminati thing - that's just capitalism.How is artificially depressing competition via government policy capitalism?
How isn't it? They're using the system to gain the best business advantage.
Government favours are not a part of capitalism.
Why not? The beauty of capitalism is having the freedom to do what you want with the money you have earned.
Quote from: Mad Max on February 25, 2015, 11:34:35 AMQuote from: Meta Cognition on February 25, 2015, 11:14:23 AMQuote from: Mad Max on February 25, 2015, 10:00:55 AMQuote from: HurtfulTurkey on February 25, 2015, 07:48:17 AMFor illuminati fans, it's good to note that Warren Buffett was against the pipeline because he owns railroads currently used to transport oil. It's more expensive and far more dangerous than the pipeline, but at least we're saving the environment, right?That's not even an Illuminati thing - that's just capitalism.How is artificially depressing competition via government policy capitalism?How isn't it? They're using the system to gain the best business advantage.You really don't understand the focus on competition in capitalism, do you?
Quote from: Meta Cognition on February 25, 2015, 11:14:23 AMQuote from: Mad Max on February 25, 2015, 10:00:55 AMQuote from: HurtfulTurkey on February 25, 2015, 07:48:17 AMFor illuminati fans, it's good to note that Warren Buffett was against the pipeline because he owns railroads currently used to transport oil. It's more expensive and far more dangerous than the pipeline, but at least we're saving the environment, right?That's not even an Illuminati thing - that's just capitalism.How is artificially depressing competition via government policy capitalism?How isn't it? They're using the system to gain the best business advantage.