>sargon
Can I get a synopsis?
Skimmed through this for a few seconds. Is there anything more to it than "more geniuses were men, so support men in science more than women"? With literal comments like "leave university to men", this seems even more vapid and dumb than the typical redpill videos by the likes of Sargon.
He basically brings up that males and females have undeniable differences/advantages in certain fields, and brings up a bell curve where women have a tendency to have a higher amount of average intelligence whereas males have less average intelligence a high amount of both low and very high intelligence. He then claims that most of the brilliant minds of the past were male because of this curve and that universities should foster males because they have a bigger chance of bringing about greater minds like the ones in the past. The problem society is facing today he says, is that with new innovations and creations, it creates new industries which employs people and as efficiency improves, employment is scaled back. So we have reached a point where innovation is being scaled down, and as a result, we'll eventually scale back employment and the economy as a whole because our ability to invent new fields and industry has slowed, and he claims this is a result of pushing for more females at higher levels of education. He certainly words it better than I do. Quote from: Alternative Facts on April 19, 2017, 06:48:10 PMCan I get a synopsis?
So, we're not innovating enough because of women?
There are more women attending college in Iran than men. Surely you're not going to tell me Iran has a "feminism problem"?
See now, what this really is is just misogyny camouflaged as utilitarianism. It's an old Nazi trick, really. Convince the drones that undesirables need to be removed from positions of influence for the good of society and next thing you know you can round up slavs by tens of thousands for slave labor with nobody batting an eye. It starts with taking women out of universities, then you take them back out of the workplace to reverse the damage to the housing market that the dual income family standard did, then you remove them from life.
lol
Quote from: Töqi on April 20, 2017, 04:37:49 AMHow does he quantify and measure innovation?Only source I see in the description is this, which just seems to state that innovation is slowing because the real GDP of developed nations is increasing at lower rates.http://www.softmachines.org/wordpress/?p=1502
How does he quantify and measure innovation?
So, I'm not watching the video because eugh, but it seems like kind of a shit argument?