A grand jury in Staten Island has decided not indict New York City Police Officer Daniel Pantaleo in relation to the death of Eric Garner, a man that Pantaleo was seen on video putting in an apparent choke hold in July, according to city officials and lawyers for Garner's family.The grand jury's decision means that there will not be criminal charges in the case but NYPD Commissioner Bill Bratton said earlier today that there may be up to three other investigations into the incident that could lead to civil or federal charges.The grand jury was made up of 23 residents of Staten Island and led by a foreperson. A decision required a majority of the jury -- meaning at least 12 people.Pantaleo, 29, and his police partner, Justin D'Amico, testified in front of the jury. D'Amico appeared only after being granted immunity from prosecution.
Mr. Pantaleo has faced two prior lawsuits for false arrest, unlawful imprisonment, civil rights violations and other charges. One of those suits was dismissed while the other is still pending.
Somebody died in his choke hold?
Quote from: Meta Cognition on December 03, 2014, 01:56:34 PMSomebody died in his choke hold?Yeah, that guy. It became excessive once he was on the ground
Quote from: Kinder on December 03, 2014, 02:02:11 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on December 03, 2014, 01:56:34 PMSomebody died in his choke hold?Yeah, that guy. It became excessive once he was on the groundDoesn't the NYPD outright prohibit choke holds to restrain someone?
Where's the mass outrage and rioting over this one?
MURICA FUCK YEAH
http://It’s only August, but an overzealous teacher and some overzealous cops have already landed a high school student in serious trouble for having — or, in this case, merely imagining — something that represents a weapon, but isn’t actually anything remotely like a real weapon.The student, 16-year-old Alex Stone, was busted after he wrote about using a gun to kill a dinosaur earlier this week.Stone, who attends Summerville High School in a distant suburb of Charleston, S.C., found himself both suspended and arrested after he completed a required class assignment, Charleston CBS affiliate WCSC reports.For the introductory assignment, Stone’s teacher asked him and his classmates to write something about themselves and their current status — like something you might write on Facebook.Stone decided to write a fictional story wherein he slew a dinosaur. He used the word “gun.” He used the words “take care of business” as well.“I killed my neighbor’s pet dinosaur, and, then, in the next status I said I bought the gun to take care of the business,” the blond, baby-faced teenager told WCSC.The teacher apparently failed to understand that he was writing a fictional account about killing a species of animal that went extinct about 65 million years ago.Then, the teacher contacted school administrators, who promptly suspended Stone for the remainder of the week.School officials also notified police on Tuesday. When police investigators asked Stone about his writing, he explained that it was a joke.The police say Stone became “irate,” according to The Washington Post, so they arrested him and charged him with disorderly conduct.When police searched Stone’s belongings, they failed to find a gun.Stone’s mother, Karen Gray, is not happy about what happened to her son.“I could understand if they made him rewrite it because he did have ‘gun’ in it. But a pet dinosaur?” the mad mom told the CBS affiliate.”I mean first of all, we don’t have dinosaurs anymore. Second of all, he’s not even old enough to buy a gun.”Gray is also upset that school officials never bothered to contact her.“If the school would have called me and told me about the paper and asked me to come down and discussed everything and, at least, get his point of view on the way he meant it. I never heard from the school, never. They never called me,” she told the station.Stone believes the school’s overreaction was absurd.“I regret it because they put it on my record, but I don’t see the harm in it,” he said.”I think there might have been a better way of putting it, but I think me writing like that, it shouldn’t matter unless I put it out towards a person.”
The wonders of Muican Law EnforcementShot by cops for Wii MoteCop not indictedhttp://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/georgia-teen-holding-wii-remote-shot-cops-front-door-family-lawyer-article-1.1619842Had no weapon. Was walking away from a dispute at a bar. he was in his car prepaing to drive away when Cops unloaded several clips into him(50 Shots). (The day before his wedding) himCops Not indictedhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sean_Bell_shooting_incidentKid Arested over Joke on Facebook (Keep in mind the woman who reported it was fucking stalking him) And somehow he's still not out of jailhttp://www.cnn.com/2013/07/02/tech/social-media/facebook-threat-carter/
Officer was serving a warrant
Well for one, sarcasm isn't expressed over the internet as in real life. Secondly, if I saw somebody post they were going to shoot a school up then I'd call it in as a possible terrorist threat myself; certain thing s you don't say online, especially when other people can see it and don't know you
How do you kill someone with a choke hold? It takes like three minutes of a sustained hold to cause brain damage let alone threaten their life.
Quote from: H̲u̲r̲t̲f̲u̲l̲T̲u̲r̲k̲e̲y on December 03, 2014, 03:05:50 PMHow do you kill someone with a choke hold? It takes like three minutes of a sustained hold to cause brain damage let alone threaten their life.Him being a morbidly obese asthmatic man might have something to do with it. I don't know what the full autopsy report was or if something like an asthma attack was the final cause of death, but it makes sense... sort of.
Autopsy was done and ruled it a homocide...and yet no indictment....
Quote from: ChaosMetalDragon on December 03, 2014, 04:36:19 PMAutopsy was done and ruled it a homocide...and yet no indictment....Homicide means "death by another human". Homicide doesn't mean murder.
Quote from: H̲u̲r̲t̲f̲u̲l̲T̲u̲r̲k̲e̲y on December 03, 2014, 08:39:52 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon on December 03, 2014, 04:36:19 PMAutopsy was done and ruled it a homocide...and yet no indictment....Homicide means "death by another human". Homicide doesn't mean murder. Umm no, the definition of homicide is the deliberate and unlawful killing of one person by another.
Quote from: Sly Instinct on December 03, 2014, 08:57:34 PMQuote from: H̲u̲r̲t̲f̲u̲l̲T̲u̲r̲k̲e̲y on December 03, 2014, 08:39:52 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon on December 03, 2014, 04:36:19 PMAutopsy was done and ruled it a homocide...and yet no indictment....Homicide means "death by another human". Homicide doesn't mean murder. Umm no, the definition of homicide is the deliberate and unlawful killing of one person by another.Not according to U.S. law. Next time read more than the first Google response.
Quote from: H̲u̲r̲t̲f̲u̲l̲T̲u̲r̲k̲e̲y on December 03, 2014, 09:02:41 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on December 03, 2014, 08:57:34 PMQuote from: H̲u̲r̲t̲f̲u̲l̲T̲u̲r̲k̲e̲y on December 03, 2014, 08:39:52 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon on December 03, 2014, 04:36:19 PMAutopsy was done and ruled it a homocide...and yet no indictment....Homicide means "death by another human". Homicide doesn't mean murder. Umm no, the definition of homicide is the deliberate and unlawful killing of one person by another.Not according to U.S. law. Next time read more than the first Google response.Yep I totally should have known the word can mean the complete opposite of itself silly me.
Quote from: Sly Instinct on December 03, 2014, 09:13:07 PMQuote from: H̲u̲r̲t̲f̲u̲l̲T̲u̲r̲k̲e̲y on December 03, 2014, 09:02:41 PMQuote from: Sly Instinct on December 03, 2014, 08:57:34 PMQuote from: H̲u̲r̲t̲f̲u̲l̲T̲u̲r̲k̲e̲y on December 03, 2014, 08:39:52 PMQuote from: ChaosMetalDragon on December 03, 2014, 04:36:19 PMAutopsy was done and ruled it a homocide...and yet no indictment....Homicide means "death by another human". Homicide doesn't mean murder. Umm no, the definition of homicide is the deliberate and unlawful killing of one person by another.Not according to U.S. law. Next time read more than the first Google response.Yep I totally should have known the word can mean the complete opposite of itself silly me.I'm not sure what you mean. Homicide literally means to kill another person. There's no implication of intent or unlawfulness in the word. Also, this isn't some difficult legal concept; I would hope that anyone spouting off about autopsy reports would have at least the knowledge that homicide doesn't mean murder.
The New Oxford dictionary lists it as "the unlawful killing of a person by another", the legal definition is broader and says it's "the killing of one person by another". One lists it as always illegal, the other lists it as sometimes illegal.
Quote from: Sly Instinct on December 03, 2014, 09:23:34 PMThe New Oxford dictionary lists it as "the unlawful killing of a person by another", the legal definition is broader and says it's "the killing of one person by another". One lists it as always illegal, the other lists it as sometimes illegal. Yeah, so which one do you think is used in courts of law, a general English dictionary or a law dictionary? I don't even know why you're arguing this. The autopsy ruled that Garner's throat and chest didn't suddenly compress themselves. Autopsies don't make accusations, they just present the facts, and the autopsy result said he died because of his preexisting conditions as an indirect result of the officer's [legal, nonlethal, and proportional] actions.