Skip to 10:30.

Old but gold.

Britain will be a sinking ship when Farage gets in. And I'm not just talking about his economic policies.

Farage > the rest of them.

Although I'm not too agreeable to their view on immigration.

Nor do I agree with him wanting to lift the ban on fox hunting, his stance on same sex marriage and many others that I cba to list.

Once Labour gets back in we can get this country back on track.

What's the big deal with you Brits and fox hunting? In the US you can literally hunt anything besides an eagle.

Upper-class people used to go out on horseback to hunt fox with the likes of bloodhounds.

You can still hunt fox I think, just not with a pack of dogs.

I have literally no opinion on the matter.

I would rather pay higher taxes for better services and having more money pumped into vital services like police, education, health than pay lesser taxes and have all those services go private.

UKIP opposes same-sex marriage, Farage might not personally but it's the stance his party took during the European elections.

More money =/= better services.

The NHS needs to reform its fiscal structure before worrying about its budget, and lessons from France, Denmark, Norway and even here has shown that private management of healthcare can be amazingly efficient and cost-effective. Also, UKIP, I believe, have promised no cuts to frontline policing.

Now, if you want to pay more taxes for these services, go ahead and send a cheque to the Treasury, but you shan't impose a cost on me for it.

As far as I'm aware, UKIP is against the forcing of faith groups to conduct these marriages, and want to take it out of the hands of the State altogether. But, nobody can really comment until they release their manifesto.

EDIT: Well, isn't that funny. There's literally nothing on gay marriage in their European Manifesto.

We do the same thing with boars. I don't believe in hunting how Americans do. They make it too easy, they take all the sport out of it. They feed deer for months on end to where the deer are comfortable and fat just to shoot them one day. And then even better they don't use any of the meat or a very miniscule amount. The times I have been hunting it's been with a bow and arrow and by simply tracking deer, not sitting in some bitch ass tree stand. And then I use ALL the meat, heart, liver, kidneys, you name it (not intestines). Guns are too much of an advantage, camouflage is too much of an advantage. Hunting should be done in a pure form where it's challenging. And that's my stance on hunting. Sorry for the somewhat off topic rant.

While I disagree with hunting I would much rather someone shoot the animal than have it torn apart while the poor things still alive. Hunting with dogs is still perfectly legal in Northern Ireland and our dinosaur politicians are too much wrapped up in their culture safety blankets to ban it.

It sounds like a very aristocratic practice. Surely your average middle class people don't support it?

Most people don't, however there are a lot of middle and upper class people who get hot tempered and go on a culture rant if you don't agree with it.