>.> and I would argue that a Celebrity-in-Chief would be infinitely worse than anything we can imagine. We don't need a real mockery made out of the presidency.
Quote from: Kupo on September 14, 2015, 09:03:47 PM>.> and I would argue that a Celebrity-in-Chief would be infinitely worse than anything we can imagine. We don't need a real mockery made out of the presidency.NEXT TIME ON CABINET APPRENTICEWhich of these ten celebrities has what it takes to become part of YOUR NEXT PRESIDENTIAL CABINET?
Reminder that Sanders wanted Paul Krugman in his Cabinet.
but I'll forever remember Krugman as the 'trillion dollar coin' guy.
Quote from: Kupo on September 14, 2015, 09:59:36 PMbut I'll forever remember Krugman as the 'trillion dollar coin' guy.It actually wasn't a terrible idea.
Quote from: Executioner Sigma on September 14, 2015, 10:08:51 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 14, 2015, 09:59:36 PMbut I'll forever remember Krugman as the 'trillion dollar coin' guy.It actually wasn't a terrible idea.Wait, it wasn't? I did all that for nothing? ;_;
Quote from: Kupo on September 14, 2015, 10:25:49 PMQuote from: Executioner Sigma on September 14, 2015, 10:08:51 PMQuote from: Kupo on September 14, 2015, 09:59:36 PMbut I'll forever remember Krugman as the 'trillion dollar coin' guy.It actually wasn't a terrible idea.Wait, it wasn't? I did all that for nothing? ;_;Read this.I'm not a proponent of it; it'd probably do more harm than good in the long-run. It's just that more than anything it was a way of bypassing an uncooperative Congress rather than being a fix-all for national debt issues, so it's probably not stupid for the reasons you imagine.