UK's National Union of Students has passed a policy to stop gay men appropriating black female culture.Delegates at the Women's Conference today, many of them self-identified feminists, have passed plenty of motions.Just one of them was ensuring everyone at the conference understood that some behaviors were damaging.On Twitter, they announced: 'Some delegates are requesting that we move to jazz hands rather than clapping as it's triggering anxiety. Please be mindful!'A later motion passed was 503: 'Dear White Gay Men: Stop Approprirating [sic] Black Women'.Put forward by the NUS LGBT Committee, they believe the appropriation of black women by white gay men is prevalent within the LGBTI scene and community.'This may be manifested in the emulation of the mannerisms, language (particularly AAVE- African American Vernacular English) and phrases that can be attributed to black women. White gay men may often assert that they are “strong black women” or have an “inner black woman”,' they said.'White gay men are the dominant demographic within the LGBT community, and they benefit from both white privilege and male privilege.'They claimed the appropriation is 'unacceptable and must be addressed'. Passing the motion, they agreed to eradicate the appropriation of black women by white gay men and to raise awareness of the issue.A second motion passed was the banning of cross-dressing or drag as it could be offensive to trans women.'To issue a statement condemning the use of crossdressing as a mode of fancy dress,' they pledged.'To encourage unions to ban clubs and societies from holding events which permit or encourage (cisgender) members to use cross-dressing as a mode of fancy dress'.This ruling was given an exclusion to queer students who want to use cross-dressing in their everyday lives as a mode of expression and to those who want to cross-play by flipping the gender of a fictional character in fancy dress.A NUS spokeswoman told Gay Star News: 'We're a democratic society, and if members voted for it, these are our policies'.Several have mocked the policies online, with the New Statesman calling into question the second motion for being 'remarkably conservative' for a group 'otherwise so much at pains to stress the variety and fluidity of gender'.Others on social media also questioned the first, saying inspiration for the slang like 'shade' and 'spill the T' was taken from the underground drag culture in the 70s and 80s, Paris is Burning and modern shows like RuPaul's Drag Race.
'White gay men are the dominant demographic within the LGBT community, and they benefit from both white privilege and male privilege.'
'Dear White Gay Men: Stop Approprirating [sic] Black Women'.
These people are all degenerates, honestly. Not against them having equal rights but they're so fucked in the head it's disgusting.
Oh my God. I also just found out that, last year, a motion to condemn ISIS in the NUS failed because it would be "Islamaphobic".
Academia is fucking doomed.
It's so absurdly disgusting that I can't help but laugh, it's also a perfect example of why SJWs are cancer and perhaps this might help my friend see that it's not just some silly slur to label anyone who is left of the centre.
Quote from: Mr Psychologist on March 28, 2015, 12:58:47 PMIt's so absurdly disgusting that I can't help but laugh, it's also a perfect example of why SJWs are cancer and perhaps this might help my friend see that it's not just some silly slur to label anyone who is left of the centre.It's unfortunate too because it has essentially handicapped moderate liberals and leftists. While the right is currently locked in a civil war over issues of immigration and nationalism with people like the EDL, the left is being fucking held for ransom by hardline feminists and tumblr-esque SJWs. And it's endemic. It's pretty much mainstream, by this point.
Quote from: Meta Cognition on March 28, 2015, 11:38:48 AMAnd fucking this: Quote 'Dear White Gay Men: Stop Approprirating [sic] Black Women'.How the fuck do they even have the authority to make policy when they CAN'T SPELL appropriating. No, it's not "sic", it's fucking wrong. You're spelling it FUCKING WRONG. What would they be refering to?
And fucking this: Quote 'Dear White Gay Men: Stop Approprirating [sic] Black Women'.How the fuck do they even have the authority to make policy when they CAN'T SPELL appropriating. No, it's not "sic", it's fucking wrong. You're spelling it FUCKING WRONG.
I meant that the [sic] obviously means they're refering to something, if they even know what it means. Is there some article or piece of writing by the "old white men" they're talking about in which they made that spelling mistake?
'This may be manifested in the emulation of the mannerisms, language (particularly AAVE- African American Vernacular English) and phrases that can be attributed to black women. White gay men may often assert that they are “strong black women” or have an “inner black woman”,' they said.
So, after an NUS conference where people were told to use jazz hands instead of clapping--because it's "triggering"