Is the moon there when nobody looks?

clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
A better representation of this question is "Are things there when you aren't looking at them?"


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
what about things you can't look at

or is that just missing the point

i'm sorry if i come off as obtuse, but this shit...
Last Edit: February 06, 2015, 04:57:07 PM by Verbatim


clum clum | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: PM me
Steam: PM me
ID: Numb Digger
IP: Logged

11,461 posts
 
what about things you can't look at

or is that just missing the point

i'm sorry if i come off as obtuse, but this shit...

Quantum physics is quite difficult to grasp, especially when you delve into the more complex stuff. To most, it sounds like utter horseshit but if you can actually understand it, it makes a lot of sense.



Turkey | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Viva Redemption
PSN: HurtfulTurkey
Steam: HurtfulTurkey
ID: HurtfulTurkey
IP: Logged

8,077 posts
 
The cat isn't alive AND dead simultaneously, it is that we can't conclusively say that it is alive or dead until it is viewed.
Well yeah, but that sounds like basic probability. I was under the impression that superposition was when a particle held two seemingly contradictory states simultaneously.

Here is why quantum mechanics is not just basic probability: Schrödinger's cat is not simultaneously dead and alive, it just has a very high probability (near certainty) of being alive and dead. Normally those would be inversely related, as probability of death goes up, probability of life goes down. The idea of entanglement and the principle of superposition dictate that the probability of either event (a discrete event to which there ought to be a single, definitive answer) is greater than zero.

Last Edit: February 06, 2015, 05:51:56 PM by HurtfulTurkey


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
it just has a very high probability (near certainty) of being alive and dead.
did you mean to use the word "and" there
or did you mean "or"

because i think i get what you're saying, but your choice of words isn't very, uh
good

"and" still implies simultaneity
Last Edit: February 06, 2015, 05:36:28 PM by Verbatim


Turkey | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Viva Redemption
PSN: HurtfulTurkey
Steam: HurtfulTurkey
ID: HurtfulTurkey
IP: Logged

8,077 posts
 
it just has a very high probability (near certainty) of being alive and dead.
did you mean to use the word "and" there
or did you mean "or"

because i think i get what you're saying, but your choice of words isn't very, uh
good

"and" still implies simultaneity

The probability that the cat is alive is high, and the probability that the cat is dead is high. That is simultaneous. The error is in thinking it is both until observed.
Last Edit: February 06, 2015, 05:52:17 PM by HurtfulTurkey


 
Verbatim
| Komm, süßer Tod
 
more |
XBL:
PSN: Verbatim-1
Steam: Jaco230
ID: Verbatim
IP: Logged

48,049 posts
how exactly can they both be high

again, i think this is just an issue with word choice--if you said something like, "they have the same probability," then we'd be on the same wavelength

"high" doesn't seem like the right word to use--when you say "high", i wanna ask, "relative to what?"


 
Naru
| The Tide Caller
 
more |
XBL: Naru No Baka
PSN:
Steam: The Tide Caller
ID: GasaiYuno
IP: Logged

18,501 posts
The Rage....
how exactly can they both be high

again, i think this is just an issue with word choice--if you said something like, "they have the same probability," then we'd be on the same wavelength

"high" doesn't seem like the right word to use--when you say "high", i wanna ask, "relative to what?"
I believe this video shows the part of the probability thing, if not, it's another video I saw.

40 seconds

YouTube