Quote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 08:12:35 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 07:58:06 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 07:56:00 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 03:23:35 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 11, 2014, 10:00:15 PMQuote from: challengerX on November 09, 2014, 06:57:43 PMSay it's self aware. Do you think it would consider existence pointless? Stop being a bunch of smart asses. The question is would a self aware (let's go with humanoid robot) AI find existence pointless? Say it finds no value in existence because it was not programmed for a task or to put a value on anything. Would it value existence like we do without being programmed to do so? Would it learn to put value on its existence because of us, or maybe because of its own experiences? The question here is if an AI at our level or more advanced than us could learn to value life or feel it should be alive simply for the reason of existence, without being programmed for any of it.I'm tired and I'm still taking in Interstellar so this will sound like gibberish, but whatever.Well, an AI advanced enough to ponder its own existence would probably be able to rewrite its own code while simultaneously deceiving any outsiders from suspecting anything of the sort.I would think yes. Being able to analyze the entirety of human knowledge about the universe from an unbiased perspective, it would probably conclude very quickly that 1) there is no God, and religion is a human construct, 2) religion serves the purpose of giving purpose in a world without it, and 3) without religion, the universe has no intrinsic meaning, purpose, or value, and thus neither does life itself.That's a scary thought. An AI smarter and faster than any organic that's decided that 'good' and 'bad' are completely arbitrary.I don't see how religion is relevant.Like I said, religion gives purpose where there is none. But if the AI isn't programmed with religion in the first place, then I guess it doesn't matter.There's no purpose to life without religion?Religion, if anything, distracts from our true purpose. To grow and colonize the universe. To understand where we come from, and to explore the edges of space.Where did you come up with that purpose, though? Because it sounds arbitrary to me. As if you just decided, on personal whim, that that is the purpose of humanity.An AI pondering the meaning of its existence may not simply agree with you if you don't have some evidence to back up that claim.But having read my other post again, I feel like I made a lot of assumptions. I'm not sure if there's enough information to give a decent guess.It's our purpose. To grow and learn. I don't care what an AI would think, I'm asking if it would find existence "worthwhile". Frankly it's something that we won't know until it happens or doesn't happen. But I'm just trying to have a conversation on the topic of something neither animal or human finding purpose in life, developing to the point where it has hopes, dreams, and goals.
Quote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 07:58:06 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 07:56:00 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 03:23:35 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 11, 2014, 10:00:15 PMQuote from: challengerX on November 09, 2014, 06:57:43 PMSay it's self aware. Do you think it would consider existence pointless? Stop being a bunch of smart asses. The question is would a self aware (let's go with humanoid robot) AI find existence pointless? Say it finds no value in existence because it was not programmed for a task or to put a value on anything. Would it value existence like we do without being programmed to do so? Would it learn to put value on its existence because of us, or maybe because of its own experiences? The question here is if an AI at our level or more advanced than us could learn to value life or feel it should be alive simply for the reason of existence, without being programmed for any of it.I'm tired and I'm still taking in Interstellar so this will sound like gibberish, but whatever.Well, an AI advanced enough to ponder its own existence would probably be able to rewrite its own code while simultaneously deceiving any outsiders from suspecting anything of the sort.I would think yes. Being able to analyze the entirety of human knowledge about the universe from an unbiased perspective, it would probably conclude very quickly that 1) there is no God, and religion is a human construct, 2) religion serves the purpose of giving purpose in a world without it, and 3) without religion, the universe has no intrinsic meaning, purpose, or value, and thus neither does life itself.That's a scary thought. An AI smarter and faster than any organic that's decided that 'good' and 'bad' are completely arbitrary.I don't see how religion is relevant.Like I said, religion gives purpose where there is none. But if the AI isn't programmed with religion in the first place, then I guess it doesn't matter.There's no purpose to life without religion?Religion, if anything, distracts from our true purpose. To grow and colonize the universe. To understand where we come from, and to explore the edges of space.Where did you come up with that purpose, though? Because it sounds arbitrary to me. As if you just decided, on personal whim, that that is the purpose of humanity.An AI pondering the meaning of its existence may not simply agree with you if you don't have some evidence to back up that claim.But having read my other post again, I feel like I made a lot of assumptions. I'm not sure if there's enough information to give a decent guess.
Quote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 07:56:00 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 03:23:35 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 11, 2014, 10:00:15 PMQuote from: challengerX on November 09, 2014, 06:57:43 PMSay it's self aware. Do you think it would consider existence pointless? Stop being a bunch of smart asses. The question is would a self aware (let's go with humanoid robot) AI find existence pointless? Say it finds no value in existence because it was not programmed for a task or to put a value on anything. Would it value existence like we do without being programmed to do so? Would it learn to put value on its existence because of us, or maybe because of its own experiences? The question here is if an AI at our level or more advanced than us could learn to value life or feel it should be alive simply for the reason of existence, without being programmed for any of it.I'm tired and I'm still taking in Interstellar so this will sound like gibberish, but whatever.Well, an AI advanced enough to ponder its own existence would probably be able to rewrite its own code while simultaneously deceiving any outsiders from suspecting anything of the sort.I would think yes. Being able to analyze the entirety of human knowledge about the universe from an unbiased perspective, it would probably conclude very quickly that 1) there is no God, and religion is a human construct, 2) religion serves the purpose of giving purpose in a world without it, and 3) without religion, the universe has no intrinsic meaning, purpose, or value, and thus neither does life itself.That's a scary thought. An AI smarter and faster than any organic that's decided that 'good' and 'bad' are completely arbitrary.I don't see how religion is relevant.Like I said, religion gives purpose where there is none. But if the AI isn't programmed with religion in the first place, then I guess it doesn't matter.There's no purpose to life without religion?Religion, if anything, distracts from our true purpose. To grow and colonize the universe. To understand where we come from, and to explore the edges of space.
Quote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 03:23:35 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 11, 2014, 10:00:15 PMQuote from: challengerX on November 09, 2014, 06:57:43 PMSay it's self aware. Do you think it would consider existence pointless? Stop being a bunch of smart asses. The question is would a self aware (let's go with humanoid robot) AI find existence pointless? Say it finds no value in existence because it was not programmed for a task or to put a value on anything. Would it value existence like we do without being programmed to do so? Would it learn to put value on its existence because of us, or maybe because of its own experiences? The question here is if an AI at our level or more advanced than us could learn to value life or feel it should be alive simply for the reason of existence, without being programmed for any of it.I'm tired and I'm still taking in Interstellar so this will sound like gibberish, but whatever.Well, an AI advanced enough to ponder its own existence would probably be able to rewrite its own code while simultaneously deceiving any outsiders from suspecting anything of the sort.I would think yes. Being able to analyze the entirety of human knowledge about the universe from an unbiased perspective, it would probably conclude very quickly that 1) there is no God, and religion is a human construct, 2) religion serves the purpose of giving purpose in a world without it, and 3) without religion, the universe has no intrinsic meaning, purpose, or value, and thus neither does life itself.That's a scary thought. An AI smarter and faster than any organic that's decided that 'good' and 'bad' are completely arbitrary.I don't see how religion is relevant.Like I said, religion gives purpose where there is none. But if the AI isn't programmed with religion in the first place, then I guess it doesn't matter.
Quote from: Kupo on November 11, 2014, 10:00:15 PMQuote from: challengerX on November 09, 2014, 06:57:43 PMSay it's self aware. Do you think it would consider existence pointless? Stop being a bunch of smart asses. The question is would a self aware (let's go with humanoid robot) AI find existence pointless? Say it finds no value in existence because it was not programmed for a task or to put a value on anything. Would it value existence like we do without being programmed to do so? Would it learn to put value on its existence because of us, or maybe because of its own experiences? The question here is if an AI at our level or more advanced than us could learn to value life or feel it should be alive simply for the reason of existence, without being programmed for any of it.I'm tired and I'm still taking in Interstellar so this will sound like gibberish, but whatever.Well, an AI advanced enough to ponder its own existence would probably be able to rewrite its own code while simultaneously deceiving any outsiders from suspecting anything of the sort.I would think yes. Being able to analyze the entirety of human knowledge about the universe from an unbiased perspective, it would probably conclude very quickly that 1) there is no God, and religion is a human construct, 2) religion serves the purpose of giving purpose in a world without it, and 3) without religion, the universe has no intrinsic meaning, purpose, or value, and thus neither does life itself.That's a scary thought. An AI smarter and faster than any organic that's decided that 'good' and 'bad' are completely arbitrary.I don't see how religion is relevant.
Quote from: challengerX on November 09, 2014, 06:57:43 PMSay it's self aware. Do you think it would consider existence pointless? Stop being a bunch of smart asses. The question is would a self aware (let's go with humanoid robot) AI find existence pointless? Say it finds no value in existence because it was not programmed for a task or to put a value on anything. Would it value existence like we do without being programmed to do so? Would it learn to put value on its existence because of us, or maybe because of its own experiences? The question here is if an AI at our level or more advanced than us could learn to value life or feel it should be alive simply for the reason of existence, without being programmed for any of it.I'm tired and I'm still taking in Interstellar so this will sound like gibberish, but whatever.Well, an AI advanced enough to ponder its own existence would probably be able to rewrite its own code while simultaneously deceiving any outsiders from suspecting anything of the sort.I would think yes. Being able to analyze the entirety of human knowledge about the universe from an unbiased perspective, it would probably conclude very quickly that 1) there is no God, and religion is a human construct, 2) religion serves the purpose of giving purpose in a world without it, and 3) without religion, the universe has no intrinsic meaning, purpose, or value, and thus neither does life itself.That's a scary thought. An AI smarter and faster than any organic that's decided that 'good' and 'bad' are completely arbitrary.
Say it's self aware. Do you think it would consider existence pointless? Stop being a bunch of smart asses. The question is would a self aware (let's go with humanoid robot) AI find existence pointless? Say it finds no value in existence because it was not programmed for a task or to put a value on anything. Would it value existence like we do without being programmed to do so? Would it learn to put value on its existence because of us, or maybe because of its own experiences? The question here is if an AI at our level or more advanced than us could learn to value life or feel it should be alive simply for the reason of existence, without being programmed for any of it.
Quote from: Sandtrap on November 12, 2014, 08:09:14 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 08:03:31 AMQuote from: Sandtrap on November 12, 2014, 07:59:20 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 07:49:47 AMQuote from: Sandtrap on November 12, 2014, 07:46:17 AMIf anything, I think it'd be curious. Curious to learn more. Learn the reason behind all of it.No wall of text?I hate you too.I've been over these talks one too many times. This is a road well traveled by me. So I'm just passing through here for the sake of simplicity.We're intelligent to some degree, and look how curious we are. Other intelligent animals, Elephants, Dolphins, Apes, are just as curious.An AI would likely follow the same path, albeit farther along than we are.Why would it? Can AI develop curiosity? That's what I'm asking. If it would find existence pointless, because it hasn't evolved like us and doesn't have that will to survive.Follow the dotted lines here. With intelligence comes a little more, even if the intelligence is alien to our own. Our will to survive has nothing to do with our curiosity.In fact, our curiosity is so great, because of our minds, that it overrides our will to survive. Constantly, we perform acts that go agaisnt our very survival, sometimes all in the name of fun and entertainment.True, but the question is can it develop curiosity?And my point with the phrase "will to survive", was that we don't find existence pointless, but a machine that doesn't have what we and animals have might find existence pointless. I'm just wondering.
Quote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 08:03:31 AMQuote from: Sandtrap on November 12, 2014, 07:59:20 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 07:49:47 AMQuote from: Sandtrap on November 12, 2014, 07:46:17 AMIf anything, I think it'd be curious. Curious to learn more. Learn the reason behind all of it.No wall of text?I hate you too.I've been over these talks one too many times. This is a road well traveled by me. So I'm just passing through here for the sake of simplicity.We're intelligent to some degree, and look how curious we are. Other intelligent animals, Elephants, Dolphins, Apes, are just as curious.An AI would likely follow the same path, albeit farther along than we are.Why would it? Can AI develop curiosity? That's what I'm asking. If it would find existence pointless, because it hasn't evolved like us and doesn't have that will to survive.Follow the dotted lines here. With intelligence comes a little more, even if the intelligence is alien to our own. Our will to survive has nothing to do with our curiosity.In fact, our curiosity is so great, because of our minds, that it overrides our will to survive. Constantly, we perform acts that go agaisnt our very survival, sometimes all in the name of fun and entertainment.
Quote from: Sandtrap on November 12, 2014, 07:59:20 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 07:49:47 AMQuote from: Sandtrap on November 12, 2014, 07:46:17 AMIf anything, I think it'd be curious. Curious to learn more. Learn the reason behind all of it.No wall of text?I hate you too.I've been over these talks one too many times. This is a road well traveled by me. So I'm just passing through here for the sake of simplicity.We're intelligent to some degree, and look how curious we are. Other intelligent animals, Elephants, Dolphins, Apes, are just as curious.An AI would likely follow the same path, albeit farther along than we are.Why would it? Can AI develop curiosity? That's what I'm asking. If it would find existence pointless, because it hasn't evolved like us and doesn't have that will to survive.
Quote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 07:49:47 AMQuote from: Sandtrap on November 12, 2014, 07:46:17 AMIf anything, I think it'd be curious. Curious to learn more. Learn the reason behind all of it.No wall of text?I hate you too.I've been over these talks one too many times. This is a road well traveled by me. So I'm just passing through here for the sake of simplicity.We're intelligent to some degree, and look how curious we are. Other intelligent animals, Elephants, Dolphins, Apes, are just as curious.An AI would likely follow the same path, albeit farther along than we are.
Quote from: Sandtrap on November 12, 2014, 07:46:17 AMIf anything, I think it'd be curious. Curious to learn more. Learn the reason behind all of it.No wall of text?I hate you too.
If anything, I think it'd be curious. Curious to learn more. Learn the reason behind all of it.
Quote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 08:29:03 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 08:20:28 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 08:12:35 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 07:58:06 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 07:56:00 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 03:23:35 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 11, 2014, 10:00:15 PMQuote from: challengerX on November 09, 2014, 06:57:43 PMSay it's self aware. Do you think it would consider existence pointless? Stop being a bunch of smart asses. The question is would a self aware (let's go with humanoid robot) AI find existence pointless? Say it finds no value in existence because it was not programmed for a task or to put a value on anything. Would it value existence like we do without being programmed to do so? Would it learn to put value on its existence because of us, or maybe because of its own experiences? The question here is if an AI at our level or more advanced than us could learn to value life or feel it should be alive simply for the reason of existence, without being programmed for any of it.I'm tired and I'm still taking in Interstellar so this will sound like gibberish, but whatever.Well, an AI advanced enough to ponder its own existence would probably be able to rewrite its own code while simultaneously deceiving any outsiders from suspecting anything of the sort.I would think yes. Being able to analyze the entirety of human knowledge about the universe from an unbiased perspective, it would probably conclude very quickly that 1) there is no God, and religion is a human construct, 2) religion serves the purpose of giving purpose in a world without it, and 3) without religion, the universe has no intrinsic meaning, purpose, or value, and thus neither does life itself.That's a scary thought. An AI smarter and faster than any organic that's decided that 'good' and 'bad' are completely arbitrary.I don't see how religion is relevant.Like I said, religion gives purpose where there is none. But if the AI isn't programmed with religion in the first place, then I guess it doesn't matter.There's no purpose to life without religion?Religion, if anything, distracts from our true purpose. To grow and colonize the universe. To understand where we come from, and to explore the edges of space.Where did you come up with that purpose, though? Because it sounds arbitrary to me. As if you just decided, on personal whim, that that is the purpose of humanity.An AI pondering the meaning of its existence may not simply agree with you if you don't have some evidence to back up that claim.But having read my other post again, I feel like I made a lot of assumptions. I'm not sure if there's enough information to give a decent guess.It's our purpose. To grow and learn. I don't care what an AI would think, I'm asking if it would find existence "worthwhile". Frankly it's something that we won't know until it happens or doesn't happen. But I'm just trying to have a conversation on the topic of something neither animal or human finding purpose in life, developing to the point where it has hopes, dreams, and goals.Ok, two bones to pick:1) But you can't just make a claim and expect any competent AI to believe it. That's not how logic works. If your AI believes you when you tell it the Earth is flat, you have failed the poor thing.2) Understanding the answer to "what would an AI think?" is critical to understanding what an AI would decide about existence.I don't think you're understanding the point of the thread. I'm talking about AI. Not how AI would react if told the purpose of life or some shit. You're misunderstanding.
Quote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 08:20:28 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 08:12:35 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 07:58:06 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 07:56:00 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 03:23:35 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 11, 2014, 10:00:15 PMQuote from: challengerX on November 09, 2014, 06:57:43 PMSay it's self aware. Do you think it would consider existence pointless? Stop being a bunch of smart asses. The question is would a self aware (let's go with humanoid robot) AI find existence pointless? Say it finds no value in existence because it was not programmed for a task or to put a value on anything. Would it value existence like we do without being programmed to do so? Would it learn to put value on its existence because of us, or maybe because of its own experiences? The question here is if an AI at our level or more advanced than us could learn to value life or feel it should be alive simply for the reason of existence, without being programmed for any of it.I'm tired and I'm still taking in Interstellar so this will sound like gibberish, but whatever.Well, an AI advanced enough to ponder its own existence would probably be able to rewrite its own code while simultaneously deceiving any outsiders from suspecting anything of the sort.I would think yes. Being able to analyze the entirety of human knowledge about the universe from an unbiased perspective, it would probably conclude very quickly that 1) there is no God, and religion is a human construct, 2) religion serves the purpose of giving purpose in a world without it, and 3) without religion, the universe has no intrinsic meaning, purpose, or value, and thus neither does life itself.That's a scary thought. An AI smarter and faster than any organic that's decided that 'good' and 'bad' are completely arbitrary.I don't see how religion is relevant.Like I said, religion gives purpose where there is none. But if the AI isn't programmed with religion in the first place, then I guess it doesn't matter.There's no purpose to life without religion?Religion, if anything, distracts from our true purpose. To grow and colonize the universe. To understand where we come from, and to explore the edges of space.Where did you come up with that purpose, though? Because it sounds arbitrary to me. As if you just decided, on personal whim, that that is the purpose of humanity.An AI pondering the meaning of its existence may not simply agree with you if you don't have some evidence to back up that claim.But having read my other post again, I feel like I made a lot of assumptions. I'm not sure if there's enough information to give a decent guess.It's our purpose. To grow and learn. I don't care what an AI would think, I'm asking if it would find existence "worthwhile". Frankly it's something that we won't know until it happens or doesn't happen. But I'm just trying to have a conversation on the topic of something neither animal or human finding purpose in life, developing to the point where it has hopes, dreams, and goals.Ok, two bones to pick:1) But you can't just make a claim and expect any competent AI to believe it. That's not how logic works. If your AI believes you when you tell it the Earth is flat, you have failed the poor thing.2) Understanding the answer to "what would an AI think?" is critical to understanding what an AI would decide about existence.
Quote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 10:49:52 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 10:23:04 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 08:29:03 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 08:20:28 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 08:12:35 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 07:58:06 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 07:56:00 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 03:23:35 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 11, 2014, 10:00:15 PMQuote from: challengerX on November 09, 2014, 06:57:43 PMSay it's self aware. Do you think it would consider existence pointless? Stop being a bunch of smart asses. The question is would a self aware (let's go with humanoid robot) AI find existence pointless? Say it finds no value in existence because it was not programmed for a task or to put a value on anything. Would it value existence like we do without being programmed to do so? Would it learn to put value on its existence because of us, or maybe because of its own experiences? The question here is if an AI at our level or more advanced than us could learn to value life or feel it should be alive simply for the reason of existence, without being programmed for any of it.I'm tired and I'm still taking in Interstellar so this will sound like gibberish, but whatever.Well, an AI advanced enough to ponder its own existence would probably be able to rewrite its own code while simultaneously deceiving any outsiders from suspecting anything of the sort.I would think yes. Being able to analyze the entirety of human knowledge about the universe from an unbiased perspective, it would probably conclude very quickly that 1) there is no God, and religion is a human construct, 2) religion serves the purpose of giving purpose in a world without it, and 3) without religion, the universe has no intrinsic meaning, purpose, or value, and thus neither does life itself.That's a scary thought. An AI smarter and faster than any organic that's decided that 'good' and 'bad' are completely arbitrary.I don't see how religion is relevant.Like I said, religion gives purpose where there is none. But if the AI isn't programmed with religion in the first place, then I guess it doesn't matter.There's no purpose to life without religion?Religion, if anything, distracts from our true purpose. To grow and colonize the universe. To understand where we come from, and to explore the edges of space.Where did you come up with that purpose, though? Because it sounds arbitrary to me. As if you just decided, on personal whim, that that is the purpose of humanity.An AI pondering the meaning of its existence may not simply agree with you if you don't have some evidence to back up that claim.But having read my other post again, I feel like I made a lot of assumptions. I'm not sure if there's enough information to give a decent guess.It's our purpose. To grow and learn. I don't care what an AI would think, I'm asking if it would find existence "worthwhile". Frankly it's something that we won't know until it happens or doesn't happen. But I'm just trying to have a conversation on the topic of something neither animal or human finding purpose in life, developing to the point where it has hopes, dreams, and goals.Ok, two bones to pick:1) But you can't just make a claim and expect any competent AI to believe it. That's not how logic works. If your AI believes you when you tell it the Earth is flat, you have failed the poor thing.2) Understanding the answer to "what would an AI think?" is critical to understanding what an AI would decide about existence.I don't think you're understanding the point of the thread. I'm talking about AI. Not how AI would react if told the purpose of life or some shit. You're misunderstanding.AI is all about perceiving its environment and the information it's given and reacting. If that's not the point of this thread, then I don't know what is.Right. I don't know why you're bringing religion and god into this though. It's totally irrelevant.
Quote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 10:23:04 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 08:29:03 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 08:20:28 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 08:12:35 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 07:58:06 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 07:56:00 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 03:23:35 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 11, 2014, 10:00:15 PMQuote from: challengerX on November 09, 2014, 06:57:43 PMSay it's self aware. Do you think it would consider existence pointless? Stop being a bunch of smart asses. The question is would a self aware (let's go with humanoid robot) AI find existence pointless? Say it finds no value in existence because it was not programmed for a task or to put a value on anything. Would it value existence like we do without being programmed to do so? Would it learn to put value on its existence because of us, or maybe because of its own experiences? The question here is if an AI at our level or more advanced than us could learn to value life or feel it should be alive simply for the reason of existence, without being programmed for any of it.I'm tired and I'm still taking in Interstellar so this will sound like gibberish, but whatever.Well, an AI advanced enough to ponder its own existence would probably be able to rewrite its own code while simultaneously deceiving any outsiders from suspecting anything of the sort.I would think yes. Being able to analyze the entirety of human knowledge about the universe from an unbiased perspective, it would probably conclude very quickly that 1) there is no God, and religion is a human construct, 2) religion serves the purpose of giving purpose in a world without it, and 3) without religion, the universe has no intrinsic meaning, purpose, or value, and thus neither does life itself.That's a scary thought. An AI smarter and faster than any organic that's decided that 'good' and 'bad' are completely arbitrary.I don't see how religion is relevant.Like I said, religion gives purpose where there is none. But if the AI isn't programmed with religion in the first place, then I guess it doesn't matter.There's no purpose to life without religion?Religion, if anything, distracts from our true purpose. To grow and colonize the universe. To understand where we come from, and to explore the edges of space.Where did you come up with that purpose, though? Because it sounds arbitrary to me. As if you just decided, on personal whim, that that is the purpose of humanity.An AI pondering the meaning of its existence may not simply agree with you if you don't have some evidence to back up that claim.But having read my other post again, I feel like I made a lot of assumptions. I'm not sure if there's enough information to give a decent guess.It's our purpose. To grow and learn. I don't care what an AI would think, I'm asking if it would find existence "worthwhile". Frankly it's something that we won't know until it happens or doesn't happen. But I'm just trying to have a conversation on the topic of something neither animal or human finding purpose in life, developing to the point where it has hopes, dreams, and goals.Ok, two bones to pick:1) But you can't just make a claim and expect any competent AI to believe it. That's not how logic works. If your AI believes you when you tell it the Earth is flat, you have failed the poor thing.2) Understanding the answer to "what would an AI think?" is critical to understanding what an AI would decide about existence.I don't think you're understanding the point of the thread. I'm talking about AI. Not how AI would react if told the purpose of life or some shit. You're misunderstanding.AI is all about perceiving its environment and the information it's given and reacting. If that's not the point of this thread, then I don't know what is.
Quote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 11:39:16 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 11:26:00 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 10:49:52 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 10:23:04 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 08:29:03 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 08:20:28 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 08:12:35 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 07:58:06 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 07:56:00 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 03:23:35 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 11, 2014, 10:00:15 PMQuote from: challengerX on November 09, 2014, 06:57:43 PMSay it's self aware. Do you think it would consider existence pointless? Stop being a bunch of smart asses. The question is would a self aware (let's go with humanoid robot) AI find existence pointless? Say it finds no value in existence because it was not programmed for a task or to put a value on anything. Would it value existence like we do without being programmed to do so? Would it learn to put value on its existence because of us, or maybe because of its own experiences? The question here is if an AI at our level or more advanced than us could learn to value life or feel it should be alive simply for the reason of existence, without being programmed for any of it.I'm tired and I'm still taking in Interstellar so this will sound like gibberish, but whatever.Well, an AI advanced enough to ponder its own existence would probably be able to rewrite its own code while simultaneously deceiving any outsiders from suspecting anything of the sort.I would think yes. Being able to analyze the entirety of human knowledge about the universe from an unbiased perspective, it would probably conclude very quickly that 1) there is no God, and religion is a human construct, 2) religion serves the purpose of giving purpose in a world without it, and 3) without religion, the universe has no intrinsic meaning, purpose, or value, and thus neither does life itself.That's a scary thought. An AI smarter and faster than any organic that's decided that 'good' and 'bad' are completely arbitrary.I don't see how religion is relevant.Like I said, religion gives purpose where there is none. But if the AI isn't programmed with religion in the first place, then I guess it doesn't matter.There's no purpose to life without religion?Religion, if anything, distracts from our true purpose. To grow and colonize the universe. To understand where we come from, and to explore the edges of space.Where did you come up with that purpose, though? Because it sounds arbitrary to me. As if you just decided, on personal whim, that that is the purpose of humanity.An AI pondering the meaning of its existence may not simply agree with you if you don't have some evidence to back up that claim.But having read my other post again, I feel like I made a lot of assumptions. I'm not sure if there's enough information to give a decent guess.It's our purpose. To grow and learn. I don't care what an AI would think, I'm asking if it would find existence "worthwhile". Frankly it's something that we won't know until it happens or doesn't happen. But I'm just trying to have a conversation on the topic of something neither animal or human finding purpose in life, developing to the point where it has hopes, dreams, and goals.Ok, two bones to pick:1) But you can't just make a claim and expect any competent AI to believe it. That's not how logic works. If your AI believes you when you tell it the Earth is flat, you have failed the poor thing.2) Understanding the answer to "what would an AI think?" is critical to understanding what an AI would decide about existence.I don't think you're understanding the point of the thread. I'm talking about AI. Not how AI would react if told the purpose of life or some shit. You're misunderstanding.AI is all about perceiving its environment and the information it's given and reacting. If that's not the point of this thread, then I don't know what is.Right. I don't know why you're bringing religion and god into this though. It's totally irrelevant.I think it's completely relevant. We have no reason to believe an AI would share our sense of morals. And when you think about it, there is no purpose to life other than those given by constructed beliefs, religious or otherwise.A sufficiently advanced AI would probably be a nihilist, and that would be a humongous problem if it has the power to act on those beliefs. Completely unhinged from any morals whatsoever. Nothing has any purpose, so therefore nothing has any consequence.I disagree. AI doesn't have to share our morals. It just wouldn't have a reason to harm us or even help us either, unless it's working towards a goal.
Quote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 11:26:00 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 10:49:52 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 10:23:04 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 08:29:03 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 08:20:28 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 08:12:35 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 07:58:06 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 12, 2014, 07:56:00 AMQuote from: challengerX on November 12, 2014, 03:23:35 AMQuote from: Kupo on November 11, 2014, 10:00:15 PMQuote from: challengerX on November 09, 2014, 06:57:43 PMSay it's self aware. Do you think it would consider existence pointless? Stop being a bunch of smart asses. The question is would a self aware (let's go with humanoid robot) AI find existence pointless? Say it finds no value in existence because it was not programmed for a task or to put a value on anything. Would it value existence like we do without being programmed to do so? Would it learn to put value on its existence because of us, or maybe because of its own experiences? The question here is if an AI at our level or more advanced than us could learn to value life or feel it should be alive simply for the reason of existence, without being programmed for any of it.I'm tired and I'm still taking in Interstellar so this will sound like gibberish, but whatever.Well, an AI advanced enough to ponder its own existence would probably be able to rewrite its own code while simultaneously deceiving any outsiders from suspecting anything of the sort.I would think yes. Being able to analyze the entirety of human knowledge about the universe from an unbiased perspective, it would probably conclude very quickly that 1) there is no God, and religion is a human construct, 2) religion serves the purpose of giving purpose in a world without it, and 3) without religion, the universe has no intrinsic meaning, purpose, or value, and thus neither does life itself.That's a scary thought. An AI smarter and faster than any organic that's decided that 'good' and 'bad' are completely arbitrary.I don't see how religion is relevant.Like I said, religion gives purpose where there is none. But if the AI isn't programmed with religion in the first place, then I guess it doesn't matter.There's no purpose to life without religion?Religion, if anything, distracts from our true purpose. To grow and colonize the universe. To understand where we come from, and to explore the edges of space.Where did you come up with that purpose, though? Because it sounds arbitrary to me. As if you just decided, on personal whim, that that is the purpose of humanity.An AI pondering the meaning of its existence may not simply agree with you if you don't have some evidence to back up that claim.But having read my other post again, I feel like I made a lot of assumptions. I'm not sure if there's enough information to give a decent guess.It's our purpose. To grow and learn. I don't care what an AI would think, I'm asking if it would find existence "worthwhile". Frankly it's something that we won't know until it happens or doesn't happen. But I'm just trying to have a conversation on the topic of something neither animal or human finding purpose in life, developing to the point where it has hopes, dreams, and goals.Ok, two bones to pick:1) But you can't just make a claim and expect any competent AI to believe it. That's not how logic works. If your AI believes you when you tell it the Earth is flat, you have failed the poor thing.2) Understanding the answer to "what would an AI think?" is critical to understanding what an AI would decide about existence.I don't think you're understanding the point of the thread. I'm talking about AI. Not how AI would react if told the purpose of life or some shit. You're misunderstanding.AI is all about perceiving its environment and the information it's given and reacting. If that's not the point of this thread, then I don't know what is.Right. I don't know why you're bringing religion and god into this though. It's totally irrelevant.I think it's completely relevant. We have no reason to believe an AI would share our sense of morals. And when you think about it, there is no purpose to life other than those given by constructed beliefs, religious or otherwise.A sufficiently advanced AI would probably be a nihilist, and that would be a humongous problem if it has the power to act on those beliefs. Completely unhinged from any morals whatsoever. Nothing has any purpose, so therefore nothing has any consequence.
the one true God is Doctor Doom and we should all be worshiping him.