>"could therefore be expected">Wikipedia
It's a synonym. Archaic and obsolete, but a synonym.
Because it isn't.
HAHAHAHAHA HOLY FUCKING LOL
You seriously need to let it go.
And if you were smarter than me, how did you not know anything about the crusades? Or pretty much every other topic we talk about that isn't muh SJW degenerate rights?
http://i.word.com/idictionary/irregardless
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/irregardless
You're obviously neither.
this not being a double negative. Some people mistake it to be a double negative, but it isn't.
ir-
-less
not being a double negative
you could be right.
LOL
Except it's a portmanteau.
You aren't, though.
QuoteLOL
It actually changes everything. If you were an English scholar you'd know that.
No, you aren't.
Quote from: Merry Mordo on December 16, 2015, 09:24:44 AMcan we make it to page 5?Nice failure to capitalize you fucking wastrel
can we make it to page 5?
It being a portmanteau means there is no double negative.
No, you're not.
Several dictionaries and English scholars.
Except it's a portmanteau. This is the exception to the rule. Because it's a portmanteau.
I've shown you several dictionaries that support what I say. You've just shrugged them off as usual because facts are irrelevant to you.
]Do you even know what a portmanteau is?
lol the mods probably think there's a genuine discussion going on in this thread lmao