Quote from: gootsbae on November 16, 2014, 02:28:13 PM

Quote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 16, 2014, 02:25:34 PM

Quote from: gootsbae on November 16, 2014, 02:23:12 PM

Quote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 16, 2014, 02:21:48 PM

Quote from: gootsbae on November 16, 2014, 02:16:22 PM

Quote from: Assassin 11D7 on November 16, 2014, 02:13:42 PM

Quote from: gootsbae on November 16, 2014, 02:11:10 PM

Genuinely surprised that Kinder and Assassin don't support the murder of Jihadi john

Because ending a person's life is wrong when it isn't necessary or when others lives aren't at risk.

He's part of ISIS, if they as a group are not a risk to others then I don't know what is.

Is he actively fighting? No.

Whoops sorry, didn't know you were currently in Raqqa, or Mosul.

Didn't the article say that he was currently hospitalized?

Still doesn't take from the fact that he was actively fighting in Syria and Iraq. Once has recovered he will go back to fighting. The world won't miss out if jihadi john is dead.

If he can be taken alive without anyone else getting hurt, then that is best.

And with that, I bid you crazy mother fuckers, goodbye.

But why? Why should he live?

Genuinely surprised that Kinder and Assassin don't support the murder of Jihadi john

I don't support the government, in this case the British, in killing it's own people without at first going through a trial. If the U.S government killed him, it would be different because he isn't an American citizen. If the British government had killed Mr. Al-Awlaki then I wouldn't be upset because he wasn't British, but an American. But seeing as how the government purposely killed Awlaki despite him not currently engaging troops, many of his Constitutional rights were deprived

Quote from: gootsbae on November 16, 2014, 01:51:06 PM

Quote from: Kinder on November 16, 2014, 01:32:14 PM

Good move

A person should NEVER be killed or given a sentence without first be given a fair trial. After all, that's western powers decide to invade countries that attack their own citizens, is it not?

He has beheaded at least 5 innocent foreigners in Syria, why the fuck should we give him a fair trial when he didn't offer his victims the same??

Innocent people that were in Syria either volunteering to help or spread awareness about the cruelty that was going. Fuck a fair trial 'Jihadi john' deserves instant death.

So people like Ted Bundy don't deserve fair trials by their native governments? Everybody deserves a fair trial. I don't care who you are or what you're beliefs are, as they don't matter when it comes to a universal human right

Nope, you should lose all human rights when you decide to behead people.

So people like Ted Bundy don't deserve fair trials by their native governments? Everybody deserves a fair trial. I don't care who you are or what you're beliefs are, as they don't matter when it comes to a universal human right

Again, justice =/= war.

Quote from: Mr Psychologist on November 16, 2014, 05:14:29 PM

Quote from: IcyWind on November 16, 2014, 04:35:14 PM

Quote from: Kinder on November 16, 2014, 03:34:28 PM

But seeing as how the government purposely killed Awlaki despite him not currently engaging troops, many of his Constitutional rights were deprived

Oh god, are you seriously still on this?

I don't think you understand just how utterly important one terrorist's right to be taken alive at great expense and risk so that a court can find him guilty and sentence him to death, really is.
#ImpeachObummer2018

Spoiler

Fixed the pic, it's Imgur or go home apparently

It's insane the lengths conservatives will go to. Pretty quick to support a terrorist there, Kinder, just to try and make Obama look bad over a technicality.

I'm surprised kinder as a conservative is trying to defend a Muslim terrorist. Me being quite liberal you'd think it would be the other way around and I would be asking for a fair trial instead of straight up death.