If I can't hold serious discussion and consistently seek guidance or support from them they're mostly equated with acquaintances in mind.
I wouldn't use the word "usefulness". You don't "use" friends. I feel like there are spots in your definition where I can agree, like here:QuoteIf I can't hold serious discussion and consistently seek guidance or support from them they're mostly equated with acquaintances in mind.I'm with you here. But the notion that they have to be willing to sacrifice their own self-interest for you and shit? If you have friends willing to do that for you, just go and like... hug them, or something, because you're very fortunate to have them. But I think it's unrealistic to expect friends to do that so readily.I look at friendship as... a mutual thing. Your definition puts a bad taste in my mouth because it's rather self-centered. It's a privilege to have someone be your friend; you're not entitled to friends. I know that's probably not what you're trying to say, but I think that needs to be spelled out.
Loyalty and utility.
Quote from: Meta Cognition on December 09, 2014, 10:41:20 AMLoyalty and utility.How do you define utility in friends?