WASHINGTON — The F.B.I. director, James B. Comey, on Tuesday said “no reasonable prosecutor” would bring a case against Hillary Clinton for her handling of classified information as secretary of state. The F.B.I.’s recommendation will have an enormous impact on the presidential election.Mr. Comey said the F.B.I. is not recommending charges against Mrs. Clinton to the Justice Department. But he said Mrs. Clinton and her staff were “extremely careless” in their use of email.The statements by Mr. Comey concluded an investigation that began a year ago when the inspector general for the intelligence agencies told the Justice Department that he had found classified information among a small sampling of emails Mrs. Clinton had sent and received.The inspector general, I. Charles McCullough III, said the emails contained information that was classified at the time they were sent but were not marked classified, and the information should never have been sent on an unclassified system.The discovery of Mrs. Clinton’s email practices grew out of a request by the House Select Committee on Benghazi for communications between Mrs. Clinton and other officials surrounding the September 2012 attack on the diplomatic outpost in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans, including Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens.As lawyers for the State Department gathered materials, they discovered that Mrs. Clinton had used a personal, non-government address for her email and routed the messages through a server, kept in her home in Chappaqua, N.Y.After a negotiation between the State Department and Mrs. Clinton’s lawyers, she agreed to turn over 55,000 pages of email from her time as secretary of state. She withheld email – roughly half the total number of messages – that she said touched on personal issues, from yoga classes to the flower arrangements for her daughter’s wedding.The State Department turned over to the House committee roughly 800 emails pertaining to Benghazi. Mrs. Clinton asked the department to release the remaining trove of emails, which set off a complicated, politically charged process of vetting each one to determine whether it contained classified information.The C.I.A., the State Department, and other agencies reviewed the emails, designating hundreds of them with varying levels of classification.Mrs. Clinton has asserted that she did not send or receive any information marked classified at the time it was sent. But about two-dozen emails were designated “top secret,” the highest level of classification, and Mrs. Clinton’s critics say she jeopardized national security.Several of those pertained to the C.I.A.’s drone program in Pakistan, which is a covert program, though it is widely reported in the Pakistani and American news media.
I mean a drunk driver doesn't intend to kill someone but they still get charged.
Total bullshit, Comey had the evidence to indict her, yet he dropped it? Apolitical my ass, especially considering her and Obama's tour coming up. If the US isn't lost yet, it will be.
Quote from: Casper on July 05, 2016, 12:06:43 PMTotal bullshit, Comey had the evidence to indict her, yet he dropped it? Apolitical my ass, especially considering her and Obama's tour coming up. If the US isn't lost yet, it will be."To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."Translation: We can't touch her, but we can say this much.
Quote from: Mr. Psychologist on July 05, 2016, 12:15:30 PMQuote from: Casper on July 05, 2016, 12:06:43 PMTotal bullshit, Comey had the evidence to indict her, yet he dropped it? Apolitical my ass, especially considering her and Obama's tour coming up. If the US isn't lost yet, it will be."To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."Translation: We can't touch her, but we can say this much.The fuck do they mean they can't touch her? She's a citizen of the US, the law applies to her just the same as anyone else.
Quote from: Casper on July 05, 2016, 12:56:35 PMQuote from: Mr. Psychologist on July 05, 2016, 12:15:30 PMQuote from: Casper on July 05, 2016, 12:06:43 PMTotal bullshit, Comey had the evidence to indict her, yet he dropped it? Apolitical my ass, especially considering her and Obama's tour coming up. If the US isn't lost yet, it will be."To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now."Translation: We can't touch her, but we can say this much.The fuck do they mean they can't touch her? She's a citizen of the US, the law applies to her just the same as anyone else.They don't want to mysteriously disappear.
Quote from: SecondClass on July 05, 2016, 03:12:31 PMlmao at all these people bitching about the decision when the literal alternative is a Trump presidencyPuke or diarrhea, take your pick.
lmao at all these people bitching about the decision when the literal alternative is a Trump presidency
Are you really voting for a deceptive, opportunistic, corrupt candidate so long as she doesn't say politically incorrect things?
Quote from: sad boi 420 ミームを吸い込みます on July 05, 2016, 01:21:02 PMAre you really voting for a deceptive, opportunistic, corrupt candidate so long as she doesn't say politically incorrect things?No, they're voting for her because she'll end up doing less stupid shit in the long run.No one but the right cares about PC culture. Ironically.
Quote from: Verbatim on July 05, 2016, 03:31:42 PMQuote from: sad boi 420 ミームを吸い込みます on July 05, 2016, 01:21:02 PMAre you really voting for a deceptive, opportunistic, corrupt candidate so long as she doesn't say politically incorrect things?No, they're voting for her because she'll end up doing less stupid shit in the long run.No one but the right cares about PC culture. Ironically.Do you honestly believe that everybody on the left is exactly like you, or do you just expect us to believe it when you say so?Everybody can observe for themselves that the most common argument against Trump is that "he's a racist".
Quote from: Maverick on July 05, 2016, 04:37:13 PMQuote from: Verbatim on July 05, 2016, 03:31:42 PMQuote from: sad boi 420 ミームを吸い込みます on July 05, 2016, 01:21:02 PMAre you really voting for a deceptive, opportunistic, corrupt candidate so long as she doesn't say politically incorrect things?No, they're voting for her because she'll end up doing less stupid shit in the long run.No one but the right cares about PC culture. Ironically.Do you honestly believe that everybody on the left is exactly like you, or do you just expect us to believe it when you say so?Everybody can observe for themselves that the most common argument against Trump is that "he's a racist".not reallythe most common argument is that he's an ineffectual buffoon who knows nothing about politics or how to run a country