Exploiting the implacable hostility between China and the Soviet Union, the Nixon Administration famously made a deal with Mao and opened relations with Beijing. This diplomatic coup shifted the geostrategic balance in favor of the West and underpinned the long period of stability enjoyed by the region since. Accordingly, some prominent foreign policy experts erroneously believe Trump will repeat this by cutting a deal with President Xi that surrenders the South China Sea.

This is not likely. Back when Nixon was president, Europe was the epicentre of strategic importance for the U.S., with the Asia Pacific a relative distraction. Now the opposite is true. Therefore Trump won't 'go to China' – he'll go to Russia.

Imagine this hypothetical: Trump meets Putin and secretly agrees to dissolve NATO entirely. Instead, a new pan-European security architecture will be established focused on counter-terrorism – one that includes Russia as a member. In exchange, the territorial integrity of the Baltic States is categorically affirmed, Russia agrees not to further test European borders, and to instead 'pivot to Asia' itself with regard to its security posture.

Such a coup would ensure Trump was counted among the greatest foreign policy presidents. It would also do Nixon and Kissinger proud.

http://nationalinterest.org/blog/the-buzz/donald-trump-nixon-kissinger-realist-15707?page=2

Read the whole thing you lazy kikes, here are the two most interesting paragraphs imo

how

What kind of resources do those Eastern European shitholes have that Russia doesn't? None, Russia's size guarantees self sufficiency so why does the bear want them? Buffer states in the case of war with the West, having them go through Eastern Europe before they can make way for Moscow is a massive defense for them if Trump is able to negotiate a deal where the security of Russia is guaranteed via the dismantling of NATO and a new security pact I see no reason why they would have to keep prodding the EE states.

Quote

Russia agrees not to further test European borders, and to instead 'pivot to Asia' itself with regard to its security posture.

why

If the West and Russia can get over the Cold War mentality then there's no reason why they can't form an alliance the two are pretty much near the same culturally. The current trend for China only looks to be going up eventually they will catch up to the West in many different factors and from what we see now they certainly aren't pacifist hence a future threat.

Read the whole thing you lazy kikes, here are the two most interesting paragraphs imo

is this a meme? the article is like three paragraphs long

you linked page two dipshit