Quote from: Mad Max on July 09, 2015, 04:54:19 PMQuote from: challengerX on July 09, 2015, 04:49:04 PMQuote from: Mad Max on July 09, 2015, 04:45:12 PMQuote from: challengerX on July 09, 2015, 04:41:51 PMQuote from: Mad Max on July 09, 2015, 04:40:25 PMQuote from: challengerX on July 09, 2015, 04:36:02 PMWhy is it you come to the Serious forum again?That's a great fucking question."waah people don't agree with me"Because you're literally the leftist version of PSU. There's a reason people made the joke that PSU is your alt.It has literally nothing to do with agreeing or disagreeing. I have no problem having civilized discussions with people I don't agree with. In fact, those are often the most enjoyable.Your hypocrisy is astounding. I made a post rebutting the points in the article you linked, and all you did was say my post was a joke instead of "having a civil discussion". Drop the act you fucking retard. You're no more interested in a civil discussion than a wild animal is.Except this has been a civil discussion until you showed up.Please, show the part where I made the discussion uncivil. Oh wait, you can't. Because you're the one who started slinging insults.
Quote from: challengerX on July 09, 2015, 04:49:04 PMQuote from: Mad Max on July 09, 2015, 04:45:12 PMQuote from: challengerX on July 09, 2015, 04:41:51 PMQuote from: Mad Max on July 09, 2015, 04:40:25 PMQuote from: challengerX on July 09, 2015, 04:36:02 PMWhy is it you come to the Serious forum again?That's a great fucking question."waah people don't agree with me"Because you're literally the leftist version of PSU. There's a reason people made the joke that PSU is your alt.It has literally nothing to do with agreeing or disagreeing. I have no problem having civilized discussions with people I don't agree with. In fact, those are often the most enjoyable.Your hypocrisy is astounding. I made a post rebutting the points in the article you linked, and all you did was say my post was a joke instead of "having a civil discussion". Drop the act you fucking retard. You're no more interested in a civil discussion than a wild animal is.Except this has been a civil discussion until you showed up.
Quote from: Mad Max on July 09, 2015, 04:45:12 PMQuote from: challengerX on July 09, 2015, 04:41:51 PMQuote from: Mad Max on July 09, 2015, 04:40:25 PMQuote from: challengerX on July 09, 2015, 04:36:02 PMWhy is it you come to the Serious forum again?That's a great fucking question."waah people don't agree with me"Because you're literally the leftist version of PSU. There's a reason people made the joke that PSU is your alt.It has literally nothing to do with agreeing or disagreeing. I have no problem having civilized discussions with people I don't agree with. In fact, those are often the most enjoyable.Your hypocrisy is astounding. I made a post rebutting the points in the article you linked, and all you did was say my post was a joke instead of "having a civil discussion". Drop the act you fucking retard. You're no more interested in a civil discussion than a wild animal is.
Quote from: challengerX on July 09, 2015, 04:41:51 PMQuote from: Mad Max on July 09, 2015, 04:40:25 PMQuote from: challengerX on July 09, 2015, 04:36:02 PMWhy is it you come to the Serious forum again?That's a great fucking question."waah people don't agree with me"Because you're literally the leftist version of PSU. There's a reason people made the joke that PSU is your alt.It has literally nothing to do with agreeing or disagreeing. I have no problem having civilized discussions with people I don't agree with. In fact, those are often the most enjoyable.
Quote from: Mad Max on July 09, 2015, 04:40:25 PMQuote from: challengerX on July 09, 2015, 04:36:02 PMWhy is it you come to the Serious forum again?That's a great fucking question."waah people don't agree with me"Because you're literally the leftist version of PSU. There's a reason people made the joke that PSU is your alt.
Quote from: challengerX on July 09, 2015, 04:36:02 PMWhy is it you come to the Serious forum again?That's a great fucking question.
Why is it you come to the Serious forum again?
you care about whether people who are mentally fucked in the head can use a female bathroom even though they're male.
This is the shit I'm talking about, retard.
Ninja'd by flee <_<But since he's off to bed, it's psyduck time motherfuckers.Roll a dice and if it lands on an integer, you gon git bant.
Roll a dice and if it lands on an integer, you gon git bant.
I forgot this was where all the coolest kids on the playground hang out <_<But what possible reason could you have for a decimal dice? ._.
Quote from: Mr Psychologist on July 09, 2015, 05:39:08 PMI forgot this was where all the coolest kids on the playground hang out <_<But what possible reason could you have for a decimal dice? ._.To fuck with you.
Quote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 09, 2015, 01:05:41 AMQuote from: Mad Max on July 09, 2015, 01:03:03 AMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 09, 2015, 12:51:20 AMQuote from: Mad Max on July 09, 2015, 12:13:09 AMQuote from: HurtfulTurkey on July 09, 2015, 12:08:36 AMQuote from: Mad Max on July 08, 2015, 11:51:38 PMBreak the law - pay the price. Sucks, but it is what it is.I'd agree if the court had said it was for punitive damages, which are intended as a punishment. The damages were strictly emotional, meaning the two women supposedly suffered $135,000 in emotional pain, yet the bakery owners lost their business and reputation.I really don't know how one determines cost of intangible damages. If that's what the judge found to be fair, I guess that's what is fair. Burning down a house or totaling a car? Yeah, we can measure that. No idea how emotional distress and such works.But apparently the owners thought fighting for their "right" to discriminate against customers was worth the risk, so I hardly feel bad for their loss.Except no laws were broken and they have a right to refuse customers. You're terrible human being for wishing them ill.QuoteA 2007 Oregon law protects the rights of LGBT people in employment, housing and public accommodations. It provides an exemption for religious organisations, but the agency ruled that exemption does not allow private businesses to discriminate against potential customers.RTFA.Dumb laws that shouldn't be laws don't have to be followed. You probably break a few every day.Ok Camnator.
Quote from: Mad Max on July 09, 2015, 01:03:03 AMQuote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 09, 2015, 12:51:20 AMQuote from: Mad Max on July 09, 2015, 12:13:09 AMQuote from: HurtfulTurkey on July 09, 2015, 12:08:36 AMQuote from: Mad Max on July 08, 2015, 11:51:38 PMBreak the law - pay the price. Sucks, but it is what it is.I'd agree if the court had said it was for punitive damages, which are intended as a punishment. The damages were strictly emotional, meaning the two women supposedly suffered $135,000 in emotional pain, yet the bakery owners lost their business and reputation.I really don't know how one determines cost of intangible damages. If that's what the judge found to be fair, I guess that's what is fair. Burning down a house or totaling a car? Yeah, we can measure that. No idea how emotional distress and such works.But apparently the owners thought fighting for their "right" to discriminate against customers was worth the risk, so I hardly feel bad for their loss.Except no laws were broken and they have a right to refuse customers. You're terrible human being for wishing them ill.QuoteA 2007 Oregon law protects the rights of LGBT people in employment, housing and public accommodations. It provides an exemption for religious organisations, but the agency ruled that exemption does not allow private businesses to discriminate against potential customers.RTFA.Dumb laws that shouldn't be laws don't have to be followed. You probably break a few every day.
Quote from: SHAWN BEEN on July 09, 2015, 12:51:20 AMQuote from: Mad Max on July 09, 2015, 12:13:09 AMQuote from: HurtfulTurkey on July 09, 2015, 12:08:36 AMQuote from: Mad Max on July 08, 2015, 11:51:38 PMBreak the law - pay the price. Sucks, but it is what it is.I'd agree if the court had said it was for punitive damages, which are intended as a punishment. The damages were strictly emotional, meaning the two women supposedly suffered $135,000 in emotional pain, yet the bakery owners lost their business and reputation.I really don't know how one determines cost of intangible damages. If that's what the judge found to be fair, I guess that's what is fair. Burning down a house or totaling a car? Yeah, we can measure that. No idea how emotional distress and such works.But apparently the owners thought fighting for their "right" to discriminate against customers was worth the risk, so I hardly feel bad for their loss.Except no laws were broken and they have a right to refuse customers. You're terrible human being for wishing them ill.QuoteA 2007 Oregon law protects the rights of LGBT people in employment, housing and public accommodations. It provides an exemption for religious organisations, but the agency ruled that exemption does not allow private businesses to discriminate against potential customers.RTFA.
Quote from: Mad Max on July 09, 2015, 12:13:09 AMQuote from: HurtfulTurkey on July 09, 2015, 12:08:36 AMQuote from: Mad Max on July 08, 2015, 11:51:38 PMBreak the law - pay the price. Sucks, but it is what it is.I'd agree if the court had said it was for punitive damages, which are intended as a punishment. The damages were strictly emotional, meaning the two women supposedly suffered $135,000 in emotional pain, yet the bakery owners lost their business and reputation.I really don't know how one determines cost of intangible damages. If that's what the judge found to be fair, I guess that's what is fair. Burning down a house or totaling a car? Yeah, we can measure that. No idea how emotional distress and such works.But apparently the owners thought fighting for their "right" to discriminate against customers was worth the risk, so I hardly feel bad for their loss.Except no laws were broken and they have a right to refuse customers. You're terrible human being for wishing them ill.
Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on July 09, 2015, 12:08:36 AMQuote from: Mad Max on July 08, 2015, 11:51:38 PMBreak the law - pay the price. Sucks, but it is what it is.I'd agree if the court had said it was for punitive damages, which are intended as a punishment. The damages were strictly emotional, meaning the two women supposedly suffered $135,000 in emotional pain, yet the bakery owners lost their business and reputation.I really don't know how one determines cost of intangible damages. If that's what the judge found to be fair, I guess that's what is fair. Burning down a house or totaling a car? Yeah, we can measure that. No idea how emotional distress and such works.But apparently the owners thought fighting for their "right" to discriminate against customers was worth the risk, so I hardly feel bad for their loss.
Quote from: Mad Max on July 08, 2015, 11:51:38 PMBreak the law - pay the price. Sucks, but it is what it is.I'd agree if the court had said it was for punitive damages, which are intended as a punishment. The damages were strictly emotional, meaning the two women supposedly suffered $135,000 in emotional pain, yet the bakery owners lost their business and reputation.
Break the law - pay the price. Sucks, but it is what it is.
A 2007 Oregon law protects the rights of LGBT people in employment, housing and public accommodations. It provides an exemption for religious organisations, but the agency ruled that exemption does not allow private businesses to discriminate against potential customers.
You all need go eat a piece of gay wedding cake and chill the fuck out
Oregon bakery owners fined $135,000 for refusing to serve gay couple
