Seems to correspond roughly to the change in unemployment rate, with people's coverage tied to their job. Just a guess, though. Could be a symptom of a poor economy in general.
Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on January 31, 2015, 07:08:43 PMSeems to correspond roughly to the change in unemployment rate, with people's coverage tied to their job. Just a guess, though. Could be a symptom of a poor economy in general.Potentially, but it looks as if from 2003-2007 there's a downtrend in both coverage and unemployment.
I'd wager it's because people who are still recovering financially after being unemployed have opted to go without coverage so they can pay off their debts.
Looks like the 2009 crash.