but even popular people can be wrong
based bill
Quote from: SecondClass on July 12, 2016, 05:39:05 PMbut even popular people can be wrongI hate you.
can't take the video seriously unless you agree with it, right?
Quote from: SecondClass on July 12, 2016, 05:46:55 PMQuote from: Meta Cognition on July 12, 2016, 05:40:50 PMQuote from: SecondClass on July 12, 2016, 05:39:05 PMbut even popular people can be wrongI hate you.Yeah, there's this thing called a conspiracy to normalize gmos happening. Keep slurping up your poison with the government-assured promise of 'oh yeah, they're totally safe', but don't complain to me when you develop cell and brain deficiencies because of them in a few decades.gmos in 2010s = cigarettes in the 1930s>blaming common diseases people get later on in life due to other causes on GMO's
Quote from: Meta Cognition on July 12, 2016, 05:40:50 PMQuote from: SecondClass on July 12, 2016, 05:39:05 PMbut even popular people can be wrongI hate you.Yeah, there's this thing called a conspiracy to normalize gmos happening. Keep slurping up your poison with the government-assured promise of 'oh yeah, they're totally safe', but don't complain to me when you develop cell and brain deficiencies because of them in a few decades.gmos in 2010s = cigarettes in the 1930s
I've actually always thought he was a bit of a douchebag.
Quote from: SecondClass on July 12, 2016, 05:42:15 PMcan't take the video seriously unless you agree with it, right?There's a difference between using "frankencrops" as a perjorative, and using it in a different context. . . I misread "condones" as "condemns", so I thought the use of "frankencrops" was serious. Of course I'd deride it. I was mistaken; why would I have an issue with a video that isn't using the term as a scare tactic?
Quote from: Callous on July 12, 2016, 06:06:32 PMI've actually always thought he was a bit of a douchebag.probably in the sense where he would take scientific reasoning over anything else. i mean, he is still a respectable guy considering his debates against ken ham the creationist and still understands different and opposing views while not shoving his views down anyones throats.
Quote from: Naru on July 12, 2016, 06:19:16 PMQuote from: Callous on July 12, 2016, 06:06:32 PMI've actually always thought he was a bit of a douchebag.probably in the sense where he would take scientific reasoning over anything else. i mean, he is still a respectable guy considering his debates against ken ham the creationist and still understands different and opposing views while not shoving his views down anyones throats.i mean, granted my exposure to him is only a few videos in school, that one "that's bullshit, that's just fucking bullshit" meme video, and a few interviews of Bill Maher, but he doesn't come across as gracious as tyson, for example, like you're making him out to be.
GMOs are my favorite food I can't wait to work for Monsanto