All the more reason to make Rangers only straight, white, Christian men. That way we don't upset anyone's cultural, social, and instinctual positions.
Quote from: Mad Max on August 18, 2015, 11:03:07 PMAll the more reason to make Rangers only straight, white, Christian men. That way we don't upset anyone's cultural, social, and instinctual positions.You would think after months of grueling, intensive training they would have developed some degree of discipline, especially toward fellow soldiers.
You'd think that as a firefighter, you wouldn't go around starting fires for the sake of making money.You'd think that as a doctor, you wouldn't abuse the people you come across and are supposed to be caring for.But alas, that doesn't always seem to be the case.
Quote from: on August 18, 2015, 11:29:42 PMYou'd think that as a firefighter, you wouldn't go around starting fires for the sake of making money.You'd think that as a doctor, you wouldn't abuse the people you come across and are supposed to be caring for.But alas, that doesn't always seem to be the case.Those aren't comparable, at all.
Quote from: Mad Max on August 18, 2015, 11:03:07 PMQuote from: HEAT SEEKING GHOST OF SEX on August 18, 2015, 11:00:20 PMQuote from: Mad Max on August 18, 2015, 10:58:01 PMQuote from: HEAT SEEKING GHOST OF SEX on August 18, 2015, 10:55:48 PMQuote from: Mad Max on August 18, 2015, 10:54:19 PMQuote from: HEAT SEEKING GHOST OF SEX on August 18, 2015, 10:50:29 PMQuote from: Mad Max on August 18, 2015, 10:44:03 PMInteresting point made about unit cohesion and such.Would you say the same if this was still the 1920's and white men didn't want black men serving with them in the military?IMO, there's no reason to keep women out of a role they are able to perform. If the men in the unit don't like it, that's their problem.the situation is hardly comparableWhy do you blue faggots feel the need to tie every issue to racism?How is it not comparable? [Person X] is able to do a job. [Person Y] doesn't like [Person X] for a stupid reason out of anyone's control, Should [Person X] be barred from doing the job? No.It's called being and adult and dealing with it. You'd think the big, mighty Army Rangers would be able to adapt to a situation, yeah?if you honestly think males and females in a group setting behave comparably, you're retardedI'm not sure you know how adults act around each other at all. If the male Army Rangers aren't able to control themselves like they're 13 year-old boys, maybe they shouldn't be Army Rangers.do you seriously think the criticism boils down to just "they'll fugg"?There's a myriad of cultural, social, and instinctual reasons here.All the more reason to make Rangers only straight, white, Christian men. That way we don't upset anyone's cultural, social, and instinctual positions.It's not about upsetting anyoneJust like you wouldn't put black soldiers in the 20s under the command of white officers who would use them as cannon fodder, so you don't throw women into the dynamic of a combat unit.Fuck, if you can't recognize that the difference between genders is far more significant than the difference between ethnic groups within the same culture, you really need help.
Quote from: HEAT SEEKING GHOST OF SEX on August 18, 2015, 11:00:20 PMQuote from: Mad Max on August 18, 2015, 10:58:01 PMQuote from: HEAT SEEKING GHOST OF SEX on August 18, 2015, 10:55:48 PMQuote from: Mad Max on August 18, 2015, 10:54:19 PMQuote from: HEAT SEEKING GHOST OF SEX on August 18, 2015, 10:50:29 PMQuote from: Mad Max on August 18, 2015, 10:44:03 PMInteresting point made about unit cohesion and such.Would you say the same if this was still the 1920's and white men didn't want black men serving with them in the military?IMO, there's no reason to keep women out of a role they are able to perform. If the men in the unit don't like it, that's their problem.the situation is hardly comparableWhy do you blue faggots feel the need to tie every issue to racism?How is it not comparable? [Person X] is able to do a job. [Person Y] doesn't like [Person X] for a stupid reason out of anyone's control, Should [Person X] be barred from doing the job? No.It's called being and adult and dealing with it. You'd think the big, mighty Army Rangers would be able to adapt to a situation, yeah?if you honestly think males and females in a group setting behave comparably, you're retardedI'm not sure you know how adults act around each other at all. If the male Army Rangers aren't able to control themselves like they're 13 year-old boys, maybe they shouldn't be Army Rangers.do you seriously think the criticism boils down to just "they'll fugg"?There's a myriad of cultural, social, and instinctual reasons here.All the more reason to make Rangers only straight, white, Christian men. That way we don't upset anyone's cultural, social, and instinctual positions.
Quote from: Mad Max on August 18, 2015, 10:58:01 PMQuote from: HEAT SEEKING GHOST OF SEX on August 18, 2015, 10:55:48 PMQuote from: Mad Max on August 18, 2015, 10:54:19 PMQuote from: HEAT SEEKING GHOST OF SEX on August 18, 2015, 10:50:29 PMQuote from: Mad Max on August 18, 2015, 10:44:03 PMInteresting point made about unit cohesion and such.Would you say the same if this was still the 1920's and white men didn't want black men serving with them in the military?IMO, there's no reason to keep women out of a role they are able to perform. If the men in the unit don't like it, that's their problem.the situation is hardly comparableWhy do you blue faggots feel the need to tie every issue to racism?How is it not comparable? [Person X] is able to do a job. [Person Y] doesn't like [Person X] for a stupid reason out of anyone's control, Should [Person X] be barred from doing the job? No.It's called being and adult and dealing with it. You'd think the big, mighty Army Rangers would be able to adapt to a situation, yeah?if you honestly think males and females in a group setting behave comparably, you're retardedI'm not sure you know how adults act around each other at all. If the male Army Rangers aren't able to control themselves like they're 13 year-old boys, maybe they shouldn't be Army Rangers.do you seriously think the criticism boils down to just "they'll fugg"?There's a myriad of cultural, social, and instinctual reasons here.
Quote from: HEAT SEEKING GHOST OF SEX on August 18, 2015, 10:55:48 PMQuote from: Mad Max on August 18, 2015, 10:54:19 PMQuote from: HEAT SEEKING GHOST OF SEX on August 18, 2015, 10:50:29 PMQuote from: Mad Max on August 18, 2015, 10:44:03 PMInteresting point made about unit cohesion and such.Would you say the same if this was still the 1920's and white men didn't want black men serving with them in the military?IMO, there's no reason to keep women out of a role they are able to perform. If the men in the unit don't like it, that's their problem.the situation is hardly comparableWhy do you blue faggots feel the need to tie every issue to racism?How is it not comparable? [Person X] is able to do a job. [Person Y] doesn't like [Person X] for a stupid reason out of anyone's control, Should [Person X] be barred from doing the job? No.It's called being and adult and dealing with it. You'd think the big, mighty Army Rangers would be able to adapt to a situation, yeah?if you honestly think males and females in a group setting behave comparably, you're retardedI'm not sure you know how adults act around each other at all. If the male Army Rangers aren't able to control themselves like they're 13 year-old boys, maybe they shouldn't be Army Rangers.
Quote from: Mad Max on August 18, 2015, 10:54:19 PMQuote from: HEAT SEEKING GHOST OF SEX on August 18, 2015, 10:50:29 PMQuote from: Mad Max on August 18, 2015, 10:44:03 PMInteresting point made about unit cohesion and such.Would you say the same if this was still the 1920's and white men didn't want black men serving with them in the military?IMO, there's no reason to keep women out of a role they are able to perform. If the men in the unit don't like it, that's their problem.the situation is hardly comparableWhy do you blue faggots feel the need to tie every issue to racism?How is it not comparable? [Person X] is able to do a job. [Person Y] doesn't like [Person X] for a stupid reason out of anyone's control, Should [Person X] be barred from doing the job? No.It's called being and adult and dealing with it. You'd think the big, mighty Army Rangers would be able to adapt to a situation, yeah?if you honestly think males and females in a group setting behave comparably, you're retarded
Quote from: HEAT SEEKING GHOST OF SEX on August 18, 2015, 10:50:29 PMQuote from: Mad Max on August 18, 2015, 10:44:03 PMInteresting point made about unit cohesion and such.Would you say the same if this was still the 1920's and white men didn't want black men serving with them in the military?IMO, there's no reason to keep women out of a role they are able to perform. If the men in the unit don't like it, that's their problem.the situation is hardly comparableWhy do you blue faggots feel the need to tie every issue to racism?How is it not comparable? [Person X] is able to do a job. [Person Y] doesn't like [Person X] for a stupid reason out of anyone's control, Should [Person X] be barred from doing the job? No.It's called being and adult and dealing with it. You'd think the big, mighty Army Rangers would be able to adapt to a situation, yeah?
Quote from: Mad Max on August 18, 2015, 10:44:03 PMInteresting point made about unit cohesion and such.Would you say the same if this was still the 1920's and white men didn't want black men serving with them in the military?IMO, there's no reason to keep women out of a role they are able to perform. If the men in the unit don't like it, that's their problem.the situation is hardly comparableWhy do you blue faggots feel the need to tie every issue to racism?
Interesting point made about unit cohesion and such.Would you say the same if this was still the 1920's and white men didn't want black men serving with them in the military?IMO, there's no reason to keep women out of a role they are able to perform. If the men in the unit don't like it, that's their problem.
Would you say the same if this was still the 1920's and white men didn't want black men serving with them in the military?
i fucking HATE women
Quote from: rc on August 19, 2015, 12:16:22 PMi fucking HATE women>"no one will have sex with me"
They still have to take another test (or whatever you hell you call them) to actually be able to join rangers
Quote from: Ender on August 23, 2015, 07:42:55 AMThey still have to take another test (or whatever you hell you call them) to actually be able to join rangersThey can't serve in the 75th. RASP isn't open to women. They're different schools. Ranger School (under TRADOC) is the premier combat leadership course in the the US military. Those who pass the course are awarded the tab, a shitload of prestige, and have mastered some of the best leadership skills to serve their unit with. The Ranger Assessment and Selection Program (under USASOC) is an eight week battery for soldiers who want to join the 75th. Those who pass are awarded the tan beret and the scroll of the battalion that they'll be assigned to, as well as a really swagging mustache. These two crazy ladies were given their scrolls two days ago on Friday.
Quote from: rc on August 19, 2015, 12:16:22 PMi fucking HATE womenThats why you have arthritis in your hand.