Americans and foreign banks

rC | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: RC5908
IP: Logged

10,787 posts
ayy lmao
Alright, so I was reading a bit about the Panama Papers, and I came across a discussion about how difficult it is for anyone with any ties to the US (citizenship, green card, etc.) to do business with non-American banks. But, I'm not quite clear on why this is the case, or if it's even true in the first place. Anyone here know anything about this stuff?


 
More Than Mortal
| d-d-d-DANK ✑ πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ 🌈πŸ‘
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: MetaCognition
ID: Meta Cognition
IP: Logged

15,060 posts
This is the way the world ends. Not with a bang but a whimper.
It really kicked off post-2008 when the government began looking for extra sources of revenue. The IRS and DoJ tried to come down hard on Americans with undeclared assets overseas, including laws like FACTA and an increased pressure to have overseas firms register with the SEC, which has made foreign banks wary of taking on US customers.


rC | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: RC5908
IP: Logged

10,787 posts
ayy lmao
It really kicked off post-2008 when the government began looking for extra sources of revenue. The IRS and DoJ tried to come down hard on Americans with undeclared assets overseas, including laws like FACTA and an increased pressure to have overseas firms register with the SEC, which has made foreign banks wary of taking on US customers.
What penalties could the US possibly impose on the foreign firms, though?


 
More Than Mortal
| d-d-d-DANK ✑ πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ 🌈πŸ‘
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: MetaCognition
ID: Meta Cognition
IP: Logged

15,060 posts
This is the way the world ends. Not with a bang but a whimper.
It really kicked off post-2008 when the government began looking for extra sources of revenue. The IRS and DoJ tried to come down hard on Americans with undeclared assets overseas, including laws like FACTA and an increased pressure to have overseas firms register with the SEC, which has made foreign banks wary of taking on US customers.
What penalties could the US possibly impose on the foreign firms, though?
Nobody really knows how something like FACTA could be implemented. So far, the withdrawal of non-US financial services has been entirely voluntary; banks are doing it precisely to avoid whatever the US government might have up its sleeve. Increased scrutiny, by itself, is something banks with large amounts of foreign assets would want to avoid.


rC | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam:
ID: RC5908
IP: Logged

10,787 posts
ayy lmao
It really kicked off post-2008 when the government began looking for extra sources of revenue. The IRS and DoJ tried to come down hard on Americans with undeclared assets overseas, including laws like FACTA and an increased pressure to have overseas firms register with the SEC, which has made foreign banks wary of taking on US customers.
What penalties could the US possibly impose on the foreign firms, though?
Nobody really knows how something like FACTA could be implemented. So far, the withdrawal of non-US financial services has been entirely voluntary; banks are doing it precisely to avoid whatever the US government might have up its sleeve. Increased scrutiny, by itself, is something banks with large amounts of foreign assets would want to avoid.
That makes sense lol. What's your opinion on the US's strict rules? Do they do more harm than good?


 
More Than Mortal
| d-d-d-DANK ✑ πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ 🌈πŸ‘
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: MetaCognition
ID: Meta Cognition
IP: Logged

15,060 posts
This is the way the world ends. Not with a bang but a whimper.
It really kicked off post-2008 when the government began looking for extra sources of revenue. The IRS and DoJ tried to come down hard on Americans with undeclared assets overseas, including laws like FACTA and an increased pressure to have overseas firms register with the SEC, which has made foreign banks wary of taking on US customers.
What penalties could the US possibly impose on the foreign firms, though?
Nobody really knows how something like FACTA could be implemented. So far, the withdrawal of non-US financial services has been entirely voluntary; banks are doing it precisely to avoid whatever the US government might have up its sleeve. Increased scrutiny, by itself, is something banks with large amounts of foreign assets would want to avoid.
That makes sense lol. What's your opinion on the US's strict rules? Do they do more harm than good?
Depends on whether or not you think the extra hassle for ordinary US citizens/residents is worth tracking down foreign assets that may or may not be held illegally.

I don't really have an opinion on it; the US government certainly has a legitimate aim, but they could be more delicate with it.