Quote from: Winy on December 02, 2015, 04:58:30 PMISIS wants glory, and they want recognition; I'll go out on a limb here and draw parallels to what allows for fucked up kids to believe that shooting up a school is how they can remedy their lack of identity and depression. Take away the fear, take away their legitimacy, and the group will die out. This is a monumentally wrong understanding of the motivations of ISIS.
ISIS wants glory, and they want recognition; I'll go out on a limb here and draw parallels to what allows for fucked up kids to believe that shooting up a school is how they can remedy their lack of identity and depression. Take away the fear, take away their legitimacy, and the group will die out.
Winy getting BTFO
Conventional warfare is inefficient at combating insurgency and plainclothes rebels or guerrilla fighters, as logic would dictate. These are not conventional enemies and operate within your own or your allies borders. The Caliphate has its own borders. It has its own standing army. It has its own supply lines and convoys that travel beyond it's held territory. It is not an insurgency, it is a rogue state.
So Winy you would trade not intervening with ISIS directly in hopes of suppressing their spread in return for allowing them to continue their atrocities upon the civilian population they hold?How can you live with that on your conscience?
You heard it here folks, if we stop reporting about ISIS they'll just go away.
Running suspect detained
I concur that's why we need troops on the ground, rather than salting the earth of the people that live there, but you've given indication in this thread that you're against that too.
The 50 are a guarantee the 200 are an assumption. I'd keep that in mind when answering that.
Quote from: DAS FOTZEZERSTÖRER on December 02, 2015, 05:22:10 PMRunning suspect detainedthat could be anyoneeverybody run from the cops in Cali
Quote from: Winy on December 02, 2015, 05:28:48 PMThey aren't "An assumption."It clearly is unless you've learned to predict the future.
They aren't "An assumption."
Yeah no shit that's what they want. That's what every single radical group in existence wants, that's what radicalism is. It's still going to spread if we don't directly intervene with ISIS.Tell me, should we have not intervened with the Nazis?
Quote from: Christmas dinner = Murder on December 02, 2015, 05:19:52 PMYou heard it here folks, if we stop reporting about ISIS they'll just go away.That's not what I'm saying, and pretty dissimilar from anything I've said at all.
Even the declaration of war against terrorism, in and of itself, is counterproductive to the goal of stopping it.
Media coverage, for example, only promotes the idea that ISIS is a legitimate state
By removing the factors of intimidation and coercion, one can effectively kill the power associated with acts of terror— Ultimately, reactions of the public are what allow for ISIS to thrive.
If the group is no longer formally recognized, and are seen as foolish or insignificant, then the supposedly glamorous caliphate that they declare will sunk further and further into illegitimacy, losing its appeal to potential recruits.