I wouldn't really consider all of these to fall under economics. I see the relation, but these are more sociology than economics imo.

I'd say most of them fall into economics, and I think all of them have economic implications even if only from a historical perspective. The "most" sociological one is probably the one regarding the Dutch famine, but even that has some massively important implications for economics; especially from a Malthusian perspective.

Couldn't that be used as an excuse to classify everything under economics, though?

No, but I think you could say that all the social sciences have implications for all the other social sciences and be pretty safe.

Quote from: DTEDesty on July 12, 2015, 04:23:18 PM

You can make this a point of you focusing on the micro economy, but what is the macro economy made up of?

That's just not a correct question to ask.

You're right, but I think that the connection is more important than each term on its own. But yes, because I said that, he can easily nullify it which makes trying to justify it on my behalf a moot point.