I love dogs.
2: Pro-adoptionI don't want biological children. They must be okay with that.
I didn't have any of these going into my relationship, or into my marriage six years later. If I had, they surely would have changed by the time we married, and I don't think there really is anything mundane that is non-negotiable. I told her I wouldn't get married in college (the ceremony turned out to be three days after graduating), but I would've. I've always wanted pets, but she's very allergic, so she's breaking what would have been her non-negotiable terms by getting allergy shots. I want to adopt at least once, and she's warming up to it.Relationships aren't about evaluating another person based on a list of desires, it's getting through life and sharing experiences with someone you love. I don't really see any conclusion for these non-negotiables except disappointment.
Quote from: Snake on February 21, 2015, 10:23:08 PM2: Pro-adoptionI don't want biological children. They must be okay with that.Can't have another Les Enfants Terribles, eh?
Lol my girlfriend was super hardcore religious when we met, head of the fellowship of Christian athletes, went to church on Sunday's, was afraid of going to hell for shit like sex, didn't believe in evolution...After 3 years of dating me she's now skeptically agnostic to me the only things that are non negotiable are1) physical attraction: a relationship just won't work if you think they're ugly2)non-sexual emotion attraction: you should want to be around the person. Talk to them, learn about them, connect with them and not just want to bang them3)willingness to compromise, this is a must for both people
Quote from: Tyger on February 22, 2015, 02:09:24 AMLol my girlfriend was super hardcore religious when we met, head of the fellowship of Christian athletes, went to church on Sunday's, was afraid of going to hell for shit like sex, didn't believe in evolution...After 3 years of dating me she's now skeptically agnostic to me the only things that are non negotiable are1) physical attraction: a relationship just won't work if you think they're ugly2)non-sexual emotion attraction: you should want to be around the person. Talk to them, learn about them, connect with them and not just want to bang them3)willingness to compromise, this is a must for both peopleThose are pretty generic, eh..?The reason I put stuff like religious philosophy and such is because if the partner's have conflicting ideologies than it creates a negative atmosphere for raising children, which I view to be the most important part of being in a marriage. That sort of thing should be hammered out beforehand.
eh?
Quote from: Snake on February 22, 2015, 02:21:57 AMQuote from: Tyger on February 22, 2015, 02:09:24 AMLol my girlfriend was super hardcore religious when we met, head of the fellowship of Christian athletes, went to church on Sunday's, was afraid of going to hell for shit like sex, didn't believe in evolution...After 3 years of dating me she's now skeptically agnostic to me the only things that are non negotiable are1) physical attraction: a relationship just won't work if you think they're ugly2)non-sexual emotion attraction: you should want to be around the person. Talk to them, learn about them, connect with them and not just want to bang them3)willingness to compromise, this is a must for both peopleThose are pretty generic, eh..?The reason I put stuff like religious philosophy and such is because if the partner's have conflicting ideologies than it creates a negative atmosphere for raising children, which I view to be the most important part of being in a marriage. That sort of thing should be hammered out beforehand. well that was kinda the point. I don't think there's a set of criteria for s relationship. If you have the 3 things I said you'll be okay. What if you meet the love of your life only to find out she's allegic to dogs? You just gunna dump her for one thing she has no control over?
AlsoQuoteeh?So Canada
1. Must indulge my kinks2. Must be less intelligent than me3. Must not be super religious
Quote from: BrenMan 94 on February 22, 2015, 01:29:59 AM1. Must indulge my kinks2. Must be less intelligent than me3. Must not be super religiousyou want a slave?
Quote from: Tyger on February 22, 2015, 02:25:30 AMQuote from: Snake on February 22, 2015, 02:21:57 AMQuote from: Tyger on February 22, 2015, 02:09:24 AMLol my girlfriend was super hardcore religious when we met, head of the fellowship of Christian athletes, went to church on Sunday's, was afraid of going to hell for shit like sex, didn't believe in evolution...After 3 years of dating me she's now skeptically agnostic to me the only things that are non negotiable are1) physical attraction: a relationship just won't work if you think they're ugly2)non-sexual emotion attraction: you should want to be around the person. Talk to them, learn about them, connect with them and not just want to bang them3)willingness to compromise, this is a must for both peopleThose are pretty generic, eh..?The reason I put stuff like religious philosophy and such is because if the partner's have conflicting ideologies than it creates a negative atmosphere for raising children, which I view to be the most important part of being in a marriage. That sort of thing should be hammered out beforehand. well that was kinda the point. I don't think there's a set of criteria for s relationship. If you have the 3 things I said you'll be okay. What if you meet the love of your life only to find out she's allegic to dogs? You just gunna dump her for one thing she has no control over?The dog shit was just to fit the 3 limit. Besides, you can love dogs without having one. Obviously if I meet the love of my life, a dog won't come between us. Unless I already have a dog, then it's just not in the cards.But the other two? Yeah, those would be deal breakers.QuoteAlsoQuoteeh?So CanadaI had to edit this part out because it made absolutely no sense. It's late.But in all honesty, I hear a lot of international people use "eh" the way Canadians stereotypically do.
Quote from: Snake on February 22, 2015, 02:30:39 AMQuote from: Tyger on February 22, 2015, 02:25:30 AMQuote from: Snake on February 22, 2015, 02:21:57 AMQuote from: Tyger on February 22, 2015, 02:09:24 AMLol my girlfriend was super hardcore religious when we met, head of the fellowship of Christian athletes, went to church on Sunday's, was afraid of going to hell for shit like sex, didn't believe in evolution...After 3 years of dating me she's now skeptically agnostic to me the only things that are non negotiable are1) physical attraction: a relationship just won't work if you think they're ugly2)non-sexual emotion attraction: you should want to be around the person. Talk to them, learn about them, connect with them and not just want to bang them3)willingness to compromise, this is a must for both peopleThose are pretty generic, eh..?The reason I put stuff like religious philosophy and such is because if the partner's have conflicting ideologies than it creates a negative atmosphere for raising children, which I view to be the most important part of being in a marriage. That sort of thing should be hammered out beforehand. well that was kinda the point. I don't think there's a set of criteria for s relationship. If you have the 3 things I said you'll be okay. What if you meet the love of your life only to find out she's allegic to dogs? You just gunna dump her for one thing she has no control over?The dog shit was just to fit the 3 limit. Besides, you can love dogs without having one. Obviously if I meet the love of my life, a dog won't come between us. Unless I already have a dog, then it's just not in the cards.But the other two? Yeah, those would be deal breakers.QuoteAlsoQuoteeh?So CanadaI had to edit this part out because it made absolutely no sense. It's late.But in all honesty, I hear a lot of international people use "eh" the way Canadians stereotypically do. I was just messing with ya, I actually hear Americans from the north use eh way more than I've ever heard Canadians use it, but I only know like... 5 Canadians But back on topic, what if she was religious but didn't try to push her beliefs on you or your theoretical kids? Like she believed in God, maybe said a quick prayer before meals, occasionally went to church, but didn't try to push that on you?
Quote from: Tyger on February 22, 2015, 09:31:59 AMQuote from: Snake on February 22, 2015, 02:30:39 AMQuote from: Tyger on February 22, 2015, 02:25:30 AMQuote from: Snake on February 22, 2015, 02:21:57 AMQuote from: Tyger on February 22, 2015, 02:09:24 AMLol my girlfriend was super hardcore religious when we met, head of the fellowship of Christian athletes, went to church on Sunday's, was afraid of going to hell for shit like sex, didn't believe in evolution...After 3 years of dating me she's now skeptically agnostic to me the only things that are non negotiable are1) physical attraction: a relationship just won't work if you think they're ugly2)non-sexual emotion attraction: you should want to be around the person. Talk to them, learn about them, connect with them and not just want to bang them3)willingness to compromise, this is a must for both peopleThose are pretty generic, eh..?The reason I put stuff like religious philosophy and such is because if the partner's have conflicting ideologies than it creates a negative atmosphere for raising children, which I view to be the most important part of being in a marriage. That sort of thing should be hammered out beforehand. well that was kinda the point. I don't think there's a set of criteria for s relationship. If you have the 3 things I said you'll be okay. What if you meet the love of your life only to find out she's allegic to dogs? You just gunna dump her for one thing she has no control over?The dog shit was just to fit the 3 limit. Besides, you can love dogs without having one. Obviously if I meet the love of my life, a dog won't come between us. Unless I already have a dog, then it's just not in the cards.But the other two? Yeah, those would be deal breakers.QuoteAlsoQuoteeh?So CanadaI had to edit this part out because it made absolutely no sense. It's late.But in all honesty, I hear a lot of international people use "eh" the way Canadians stereotypically do. I was just messing with ya, I actually hear Americans from the north use eh way more than I've ever heard Canadians use it, but I only know like... 5 Canadians But back on topic, what if she was religious but didn't try to push her beliefs on you or your theoretical kids? Like she believed in God, maybe said a quick prayer before meals, occasionally went to church, but didn't try to push that on you?Yeah, I knew you were joking. I just didn't have a clever response at 5 AM in the morning lol.But on-topic...It goes deeper than that, though. A lot of my views on life are extremely non-religious, and I just don't see a religious person holding those views. Things like anti-natalism or evolution really change how you see the world.I mean, if by the slightest chance a potential (for example) Christian female subscribed to evolution, and said that Genesis wasn't literal, that would make her an idiot, and I wouldn't be attracted to her. She allows the Bible to dictate her life but she doesn't take the entire religion's catalyst literally? That makes no sense.It's not so much "Oh, you're religious? I don't like you." that's the problem. It's that being religious by default, is typically an indication to a lack of intelligence or critical-thinking.I'm not saying that all religious people = idiots, obviously. Turkey and Goji are both far smarter than I and they're religious. But the chances that a teenage girl can defend her beliefs as well as experienced, nerdy male keyboard warriors like the two I just brought up are slim to none. Not to mention, the chances that I'm attracted to girls in general to the point of considering a relationship are slim to none.In conclusion:It's not that I don't let myself get involved romantically with religious people, it's that I don't want to. Being religious is inherently unattractive to me.
Also just a side bar about one of your comments, the catholic church recognizes evolution and the Big Bang as real
Quote from: Tyger on February 22, 2015, 09:50:12 AMAlso just a side bar about one of your comments, the catholic church recognizes evolution and the Big Bang as realI think it's just evolution, not the Big Bang. But I could be wrong.
Quote from: Snake on February 22, 2015, 09:56:43 AMQuote from: Tyger on February 22, 2015, 09:50:12 AMAlso just a side bar about one of your comments, the catholic church recognizes evolution and the Big Bang as realI think it's just evolution, not the Big Bang. But I could be wrong.The Big Bang Theory originated from a Catholic priest.