"Corporate personhood" and politics

Turkey | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Viva Redemption
PSN: HurtfulTurkey
Steam: HurtfulTurkey
ID: HurtfulTurkey
IP: Logged

8,077 posts
 
Spoiler

So this is on Reddit's frontpage right now, and I just want to point out a few things. At first I thought this was a joke because of how simple-minded it is, with two people seemingly discussing the reason that corporations are given the rights of citizens -- and that reason is, obviously, that corporations are comprised of people who do not lose their rights simply because they've entered into business together. So a few big things "corporate personhood" (clearly I think this label is a huge misnomer) gives them: corporations can be sued and taxed, and they also can't be censored unfairly. Stuff it doesn't give them: the right to donate to campaigns. That's from a separate court ruling from the case Citizens United v. The FEC, which doesn't pertain to corporate personhood in the slightest. And even if corporations couldn't directly donate, then the shareholders could just give themselves the money and spend it themselves, which I presume would be private information; I think I'd prefer to make it transparent and have the corporations do it. There's also quite a bit of irony (hypocrisy?) in Ben and Jerry using their corporate name in a political setting to advocate against the right of corporations to speak and donate in the realm of politics.
Last Edit: July 14, 2015, 05:44:11 PM by HurtfulTurkey


 
More Than Mortal
| d-d-d-DANK ✑ πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ 🌈πŸ‘
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: MetaCognition
ID: Meta Cognition
IP: Logged

15,060 posts
This is the way the world ends. Not with a bang but a whimper.
corporations can be sued and taxed
Just as a minor digression, this doesn't seem like a good thing.

We know taxing corporations is a pretty awful idea, and I imagine suing them isn't as effective as suing the executives/shareholders.


Turkey | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Viva Redemption
PSN: HurtfulTurkey
Steam: HurtfulTurkey
ID: HurtfulTurkey
IP: Logged

8,077 posts
 
corporations can be sued and taxed
Just as a minor digression, this doesn't seem like a good thing.

We know taxing corporations is a pretty awful idea, and I imagine suing them isn't as effective as suing the executives/shareholders.

Yeah, I was pointing it out because liberals often cite corporate personhood as a shady backdoor deal between big business and Congress when in reality it was a fairly liberal decision. Quite a large attraction of incorporation is the protection it grants individuals to risk their money and the investors' money.


XBL:
PSN: ModernLocust
Steam:
ID: SecondClass
IP: Logged

30,022 posts
"With the first link, the chain is forged. The first speech censured, the first thought forbidden, the first freedom denied, chains us all irrevocably."
β€”Judge Aaron Satie
β€”β€”Carmen
Shit makes no sense Turkey

all of that aspartame is starting to affect you


 
More Than Mortal
| d-d-d-DANK ✑ πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ 🌈πŸ‘
 
more |
XBL:
PSN:
Steam: MetaCognition
ID: Meta Cognition
IP: Logged

15,060 posts
This is the way the world ends. Not with a bang but a whimper.
Shit makes no sense Turkey
It makes perfect sense.

Sanders/Ben and Jerry are confusing corporate personhood with the Citizens United ruling.


Turkey | Mythic Inconceivable!
 
more |
XBL: Viva Redemption
PSN: HurtfulTurkey
Steam: HurtfulTurkey
ID: HurtfulTurkey
IP: Logged

8,077 posts
 
Shit makes no sense Turkey

all of that aspartame is starting to affect you

50/50 chance it is.


BrenMan 94 | Heroic Unstoppable!
 
more |
XBL: BrenMan 94
PSN:
Steam: BrenMan 94
ID: BrenMan 94
IP: Logged

1,886 posts
 
I honestly don't see how you can tax an entity, not give it equal representation under the law, and then call it fair.