Unless posts weren't counted.
Quote from: Nagato on March 02, 2015, 11:38:20 AMUnless posts weren't counted.I'm not saying spam should be allowed at all, and I really don't see what post count has to do with anything.
Quote from: Soʟoɴoɪᴅ on March 02, 2015, 12:10:30 PMQuote from: Nagato on March 02, 2015, 11:38:20 AMUnless posts weren't counted.I'm not saying spam should be allowed at all, and I really don't see what post count has to do with anything.Shitposting for the sake of shitposting might as well be spam.And it has the same effect.
Quote from: Nagato on March 02, 2015, 12:23:52 PMQuote from: Soʟoɴoɪᴅ on March 02, 2015, 12:10:30 PMQuote from: Nagato on March 02, 2015, 11:38:20 AMUnless posts weren't counted.I'm not saying spam should be allowed at all, and I really don't see what post count has to do with anything.Shitposting for the sake of shitposting might as well be spam.And it has the same effect.But don't you think the Flood would be better off without it?If you don't like it, you could just never go to that board.It was my plan not to.>.>
Banning shitposting means that we need some sort of (specific) definition for it, lest the mods go lock/warning/ban-happy.