Quote from: Cheat on August 25, 2015, 05:43:13 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:41:12 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts™ on August 25, 2015, 05:40:23 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:39:23 PMQuote from: Cheat on August 25, 2015, 05:37:41 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts™ on August 25, 2015, 05:21:16 PMQuote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 05:19:43 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:16:47 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 05:15:43 PMthis wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbhwhat do you guys think of thati'd be in goddamn full acceptance of thateveryone winsThat's just silly and you know it.How? We already have a similar option with AnarchyI'm not opposed to allowing them if they're hidden to guests by default and can be enabledthen just do that ffsIt requires a different script, and there are other priorities first.i would call this a top priorityIt's definitely not a top priority, mate. There are a handful of UI improvements and fixes that need to be addressed (for mobile mostly) first. I'm already running behind on groups. the approval and overall happiness of a sizable portion of your user base isn't important?
Quote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:41:12 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts™ on August 25, 2015, 05:40:23 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:39:23 PMQuote from: Cheat on August 25, 2015, 05:37:41 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts™ on August 25, 2015, 05:21:16 PMQuote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 05:19:43 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:16:47 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 05:15:43 PMthis wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbhwhat do you guys think of thati'd be in goddamn full acceptance of thateveryone winsThat's just silly and you know it.How? We already have a similar option with AnarchyI'm not opposed to allowing them if they're hidden to guests by default and can be enabledthen just do that ffsIt requires a different script, and there are other priorities first.i would call this a top priorityIt's definitely not a top priority, mate. There are a handful of UI improvements and fixes that need to be addressed (for mobile mostly) first. I'm already running behind on groups.
Quote from: Frigid Farts™ on August 25, 2015, 05:40:23 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:39:23 PMQuote from: Cheat on August 25, 2015, 05:37:41 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts™ on August 25, 2015, 05:21:16 PMQuote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 05:19:43 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:16:47 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 05:15:43 PMthis wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbhwhat do you guys think of thati'd be in goddamn full acceptance of thateveryone winsThat's just silly and you know it.How? We already have a similar option with AnarchyI'm not opposed to allowing them if they're hidden to guests by default and can be enabledthen just do that ffsIt requires a different script, and there are other priorities first.i would call this a top priority
Quote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:39:23 PMQuote from: Cheat on August 25, 2015, 05:37:41 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts™ on August 25, 2015, 05:21:16 PMQuote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 05:19:43 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:16:47 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 05:15:43 PMthis wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbhwhat do you guys think of thati'd be in goddamn full acceptance of thateveryone winsThat's just silly and you know it.How? We already have a similar option with AnarchyI'm not opposed to allowing them if they're hidden to guests by default and can be enabledthen just do that ffsIt requires a different script, and there are other priorities first.
Quote from: Cheat on August 25, 2015, 05:37:41 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts™ on August 25, 2015, 05:21:16 PMQuote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 05:19:43 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:16:47 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 05:15:43 PMthis wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbhwhat do you guys think of thati'd be in goddamn full acceptance of thateveryone winsThat's just silly and you know it.How? We already have a similar option with AnarchyI'm not opposed to allowing them if they're hidden to guests by default and can be enabledthen just do that ffs
Quote from: Frigid Farts™ on August 25, 2015, 05:21:16 PMQuote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 05:19:43 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:16:47 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 05:15:43 PMthis wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbhwhat do you guys think of thati'd be in goddamn full acceptance of thateveryone winsThat's just silly and you know it.How? We already have a similar option with AnarchyI'm not opposed to allowing them if they're hidden to guests by default and can be enabled
Quote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 05:19:43 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:16:47 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 05:15:43 PMthis wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbhwhat do you guys think of thati'd be in goddamn full acceptance of thateveryone winsThat's just silly and you know it.How? We already have a similar option with Anarchy
Quote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:16:47 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 05:15:43 PMthis wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbhwhat do you guys think of thati'd be in goddamn full acceptance of thateveryone winsThat's just silly and you know it.
Quote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 05:15:43 PMthis wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbhwhat do you guys think of thati'd be in goddamn full acceptance of thateveryone wins
this wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbhwhat do you guys think of that
Quote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 06:00:50 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:54:58 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 05:51:22 PM"i can't be happy unless I'm allowed to use this image of some whore jiggling her ass cheeks as my avatar "fuck me runningits an overall principle of unfair censorship. Generally the censorship of one form of expression leads another until you have a really unenjoyable website. Can you please explain how violating set forum rules is unfair censorship?its blocking things for being NSFW when they're not necessarily NSFWthat's unfair censorship
Quote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:54:58 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 05:51:22 PM"i can't be happy unless I'm allowed to use this image of some whore jiggling her ass cheeks as my avatar "fuck me runningits an overall principle of unfair censorship. Generally the censorship of one form of expression leads another until you have a really unenjoyable website. Can you please explain how violating set forum rules is unfair censorship?
Quote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 05:51:22 PM"i can't be happy unless I'm allowed to use this image of some whore jiggling her ass cheeks as my avatar "fuck me runningits an overall principle of unfair censorship. Generally the censorship of one form of expression leads another until you have a really unenjoyable website.
"i can't be happy unless I'm allowed to use this image of some whore jiggling her ass cheeks as my avatar "fuck me running
say you're at work browsing facebook and one of your female friends posted pictures of them at the beach. is the exposure of the ass cheeks that modern swimsuits present considered NSFW?
Quote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 06:05:48 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 06:01:41 PMQuote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 06:00:50 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:54:58 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 05:51:22 PM"i can't be happy unless I'm allowed to use this image of some whore jiggling her ass cheeks as my avatar "fuck me runningits an overall principle of unfair censorship. Generally the censorship of one form of expression leads another until you have a really unenjoyable website. Can you please explain how violating set forum rules is unfair censorship?its blocking things for being NSFW when they're not necessarily NSFWthat's unfair censorshipIf you're talking about the booty jiggling as much as I do enjoy a nice booty bounce it is not safe for work since her ass is exposed.an exposed ass (cheeks) isn't necessarily NSFWlet me present a hypothetical for yousay you're at work browsing facebook and one of your female friends posted pictures of them at the beach. is the exposure of the ass cheeks that modern swimsuits present considered NSFW?and there were ones that had even less warrant for removal, Zen's avatar for instant.
Quote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 06:01:41 PMQuote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 06:00:50 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:54:58 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 05:51:22 PM"i can't be happy unless I'm allowed to use this image of some whore jiggling her ass cheeks as my avatar "fuck me runningits an overall principle of unfair censorship. Generally the censorship of one form of expression leads another until you have a really unenjoyable website. Can you please explain how violating set forum rules is unfair censorship?its blocking things for being NSFW when they're not necessarily NSFWthat's unfair censorshipIf you're talking about the booty jiggling as much as I do enjoy a nice booty bounce it is not safe for work since her ass is exposed.
so you're saying in that hypothetical you would be fired for looking at pictures of your friend on Facebook where they happened to be at the beach?
Profile image cannot be anything illegal (No loli/graphic gore/etc) and no porn.Otherwise, we're fairly lenient
Quote from: Frigid Farts™ on August 25, 2015, 04:27:09 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 04:25:30 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts™ on August 25, 2015, 04:22:37 PMProfile image cannot be anything illegal (No loli/graphic gore/etc) and no porn.Otherwise, we're fairly lenientyou might want to review your own rules on that because avatars that aren't porn have been removed"Fairly lenient"There are always exceptions. Play nice. Blah blah blah.the avatar thing is far from lenient there is no legitimate reason this shouldn't be allowed as an avatar
Quote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 04:25:30 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts™ on August 25, 2015, 04:22:37 PMProfile image cannot be anything illegal (No loli/graphic gore/etc) and no porn.Otherwise, we're fairly lenientyou might want to review your own rules on that because avatars that aren't porn have been removed"Fairly lenient"There are always exceptions. Play nice. Blah blah blah.
Quote from: Frigid Farts™ on August 25, 2015, 04:22:37 PMProfile image cannot be anything illegal (No loli/graphic gore/etc) and no porn.Otherwise, we're fairly lenientyou might want to review your own rules on that because avatars that aren't porn have been removed
mine's best
Quote from: adubato on August 25, 2015, 04:22:43 PMmine's bestWhat is that from?
Quote from: Rocketman287 on August 27, 2015, 12:07:10 AMQuote from: adubato on August 25, 2015, 04:22:43 PMmine's bestWhat is that from?the minions™ movie
Profile picture
