the one true God is Doctor Doom and we should all be worshiping him.
they're not able to be spoilered to guests and potential members.
Quote from: Cheat on August 25, 2015, 04:49:24 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 04:44:38 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 04:42:49 PMNSFW in itself is a very subjective term and you can't really apply objectivity to it.indeedyou contradicted yourself, by the waycheat considers it NSFWYes. Unfortunately the practice of judging images is subjective. Sorry if that rustles your jimmies, but the avatar and nameplate images are going to need to remain on the safer side, since they're not able to be spoilered to guests and potential members.you don't have any potential members outside of people coming from b.net and most of them are completely used and have no problem to stuff like this. I think you have this idea that you have this wildly expanding community of people that are completely new to the internet, well you fucking don't.
Quote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 04:44:38 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 04:42:49 PMNSFW in itself is a very subjective term and you can't really apply objectivity to it.indeedyou contradicted yourself, by the waycheat considers it NSFWYes. Unfortunately the practice of judging images is subjective. Sorry if that rustles your jimmies, but the avatar and nameplate images are going to need to remain on the safer side, since they're not able to be spoilered to guests and potential members.
Quote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 04:42:49 PMNSFW in itself is a very subjective term and you can't really apply objectivity to it.indeedyou contradicted yourself, by the waycheat considers it NSFW
NSFW in itself is a very subjective term and you can't really apply objectivity to it.
It isn't like we get many new members that aren't from B.net, and if anyone is offended by a bouncing ass or an O-face then they're too young to be here anyway.
Quote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 04:51:33 PMQuote from: Cheat on August 25, 2015, 04:49:24 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 04:44:38 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 04:42:49 PMNSFW in itself is a very subjective term and you can't really apply objectivity to it.indeedyou contradicted yourself, by the waycheat considers it NSFWYes. Unfortunately the practice of judging images is subjective. Sorry if that rustles your jimmies, but the avatar and nameplate images are going to need to remain on the safer side, since they're not able to be spoilered to guests and potential members.you don't have any potential members outside of people coming from b.net and most of them are completely used and have no problem to stuff like this. I think you have this idea that you have this wildly expanding community of people that are completely new to the internet, well you fucking don't.You have to also remember that there are minors that frequent Sep7agon, and I'm pretty sure it's illegal in most of the United States to show minors any form of pornography. Although, as suggestive as that gif is it is not pornographic, but Cheat has the final say on anything that goes on on his forum.
Quote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 04:57:59 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 04:51:33 PMQuote from: Cheat on August 25, 2015, 04:49:24 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 04:44:38 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 04:42:49 PMNSFW in itself is a very subjective term and you can't really apply objectivity to it.indeedyou contradicted yourself, by the waycheat considers it NSFWYes. Unfortunately the practice of judging images is subjective. Sorry if that rustles your jimmies, but the avatar and nameplate images are going to need to remain on the safer side, since they're not able to be spoilered to guests and potential members.you don't have any potential members outside of people coming from b.net and most of them are completely used and have no problem to stuff like this. I think you have this idea that you have this wildly expanding community of people that are completely new to the internet, well you fucking don't.You have to also remember that there are minors that frequent Sep7agon, and I'm pretty sure it's illegal in most of the United States to show minors any form of pornography. Although, as suggestive as that gif is it is not pornographic, but Cheat has the final say on anything that goes on on his forum.At the same time, this is the only facet where we try to make thing appropriate for minors. We don't forbid swearing, there are plenty of "racist" jokes, half of the images outside of avatars aren't appropriate for minors.It isn't, or shouldn't be, our place to ensure that everything is sterile and family-friendly.
Quote from: Frigid Farts[emoji769] on August 25, 2015, 05:00:52 PMQuote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 04:57:59 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 04:51:33 PMQuote from: Cheat on August 25, 2015, 04:49:24 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 04:44:38 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 04:42:49 PMNSFW in itself is a very subjective term and you can't really apply objectivity to it.indeedyou contradicted yourself, by the waycheat considers it NSFWYes. Unfortunately the practice of judging images is subjective. Sorry if that rustles your jimmies, but the avatar and nameplate images are going to need to remain on the safer side, since they're not able to be spoilered to guests and potential members.you don't have any potential members outside of people coming from b.net and most of them are completely used and have no problem to stuff like this. I think you have this idea that you have this wildly expanding community of people that are completely new to the internet, well you fucking don't.You have to also remember that there are minors that frequent Sep7agon, and I'm pretty sure it's illegal in most of the United States to show minors any form of pornography. Although, as suggestive as that gif is it is not pornographic, but Cheat has the final say on anything that goes on on his forum.At the same time, this is the only facet where we try to make thing appropriate for minors. We don't forbid swearing, there are plenty of "racist" jokes, half of the images outside of avatars aren't appropriate for minors.It isn't, or shouldn't be, our place to ensure that everything is sterile and family-friendly.Of course we can't shelter them from swearing and our dirty jokes, but at least keep the avatars and nameplates PG13. The last thing I want is to forbid our usual banter otherwise this place would die.
You have to also remember that there are minors that frequent Sep7agon
and I'm pretty sure it's illegal in most of the United States to show minors any form of pornography.
then they're too young to be here anyway.
Quote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 05:02:51 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts[emoji769] on August 25, 2015, 05:00:52 PMQuote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 04:57:59 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 04:51:33 PMQuote from: Cheat on August 25, 2015, 04:49:24 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 04:44:38 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 04:42:49 PMNSFW in itself is a very subjective term and you can't really apply objectivity to it.indeedyou contradicted yourself, by the waycheat considers it NSFWYes. Unfortunately the practice of judging images is subjective. Sorry if that rustles your jimmies, but the avatar and nameplate images are going to need to remain on the safer side, since they're not able to be spoilered to guests and potential members.you don't have any potential members outside of people coming from b.net and most of them are completely used and have no problem to stuff like this. I think you have this idea that you have this wildly expanding community of people that are completely new to the internet, well you fucking don't.You have to also remember that there are minors that frequent Sep7agon, and I'm pretty sure it's illegal in most of the United States to show minors any form of pornography. Although, as suggestive as that gif is it is not pornographic, but Cheat has the final say on anything that goes on on his forum.At the same time, this is the only facet where we try to make thing appropriate for minors. We don't forbid swearing, there are plenty of "racist" jokes, half of the images outside of avatars aren't appropriate for minors.It isn't, or shouldn't be, our place to ensure that everything is sterile and family-friendly.Of course we can't shelter them from swearing and our dirty jokes, but at least keep the avatars and nameplates PG13. The last thing I want is to forbid our usual banter otherwise this place would die.There are quite a few PG13 movies with suggestive themes and partial nudity. Hell, most of them have it
There are? Who?
Quote from: Frigid Farts[emoji769] on August 25, 2015, 05:07:12 PMQuote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 05:02:51 PMQuote from: Frigid Farts[emoji769] on August 25, 2015, 05:00:52 PMQuote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 04:57:59 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 04:51:33 PMQuote from: Cheat on August 25, 2015, 04:49:24 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 04:44:38 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 04:42:49 PMNSFW in itself is a very subjective term and you can't really apply objectivity to it.indeedyou contradicted yourself, by the waycheat considers it NSFWYes. Unfortunately the practice of judging images is subjective. Sorry if that rustles your jimmies, but the avatar and nameplate images are going to need to remain on the safer side, since they're not able to be spoilered to guests and potential members.you don't have any potential members outside of people coming from b.net and most of them are completely used and have no problem to stuff like this. I think you have this idea that you have this wildly expanding community of people that are completely new to the internet, well you fucking don't.You have to also remember that there are minors that frequent Sep7agon, and I'm pretty sure it's illegal in most of the United States to show minors any form of pornography. Although, as suggestive as that gif is it is not pornographic, but Cheat has the final say on anything that goes on on his forum.At the same time, this is the only facet where we try to make thing appropriate for minors. We don't forbid swearing, there are plenty of "racist" jokes, half of the images outside of avatars aren't appropriate for minors.It isn't, or shouldn't be, our place to ensure that everything is sterile and family-friendly.Of course we can't shelter them from swearing and our dirty jokes, but at least keep the avatars and nameplates PG13. The last thing I want is to forbid our usual banter otherwise this place would die.There are quite a few PG13 movies with suggestive themes and partial nudity. Hell, most of them have itTouché but even at that there should be some common sense about what your avatar should and should not be. -.-
Quote from: Batch on August 25, 2015, 04:42:23 PMQuote from: Cheat on August 25, 2015, 04:41:24 PMTo be clear: the rule is that avatars and nameplates must be safe for work.Well twerking, while suggestive is still safe for work yes?Not really.You'd probably get fired from your job if you were caught by a boss.
Quote from: Cheat on August 25, 2015, 04:41:24 PMTo be clear: the rule is that avatars and nameplates must be safe for work.Well twerking, while suggestive is still safe for work yes?
To be clear: the rule is that avatars and nameplates must be safe for work.
Quote from: Liquid Plotmaster on August 25, 2015, 04:56:42 PM then they're too young to be here anyway.I don't remember having to input my age to access the website.
Quote from: GAIUS DASSIUS B00TSAR on August 25, 2015, 05:08:37 PMQuote from: Liquid Plotmaster on August 25, 2015, 04:56:42 PM then they're too young to be here anyway.I don't remember having to input my age to access the website.I'll amend that to too sheltered. Really, sex is the least offensive shit posted here, so I can't imagine why this is a point of controversy when words like 'faggot' and 'nigger' are thrown around with abandon.
Quote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 05:15:43 PMthis wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbhwhat do you guys think of thati'd be in goddamn full acceptance of thateveryone wins
this wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbhwhat do you guys think of that
meta is still 17, too (could be wrong though)
Quote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:16:47 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 05:15:43 PMthis wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbhwhat do you guys think of thati'd be in goddamn full acceptance of thateveryone winsThat's just silly and you know it.
Quote from: Kitsunekun on August 25, 2015, 05:19:43 PMQuote from: SoporificSlash on August 25, 2015, 05:16:47 PMQuote from: Verbatim on August 25, 2015, 05:15:43 PMthis wouldn't be a problem if we could block individual avatars, tbhwhat do you guys think of thati'd be in goddamn full acceptance of thateveryone winsThat's just silly and you know it.How? We already have a similar option with Anarchy
...What? I always imagined he was in his twenties. Though I suppose I shouldn't be trying to determine age through text.