How about the loli rule for Anarchy is actually in detail about the types of it?

Mattie G Indahouse · February 19, 2015, 07:41:50 AM

As it is right now it's vague as hell. Loli is the term for female childlike humans not males or humanoids. So because of that you're going to have people like Jim posting images of a humanoids since the rule doesn't go into any detail about the types of it. One of the types is called "cub" which is for furries. If I post a cub image I would get banned even though nothing about furries is mentioned under this rule for female humans. That's what happened to Jim Hell the rule is so vague that nothing about the male version of loli's which is a different term isn't a rule as well.

Mat Cauthon · February 19, 2015, 08:53:48 AM

I really don't see how you need to define it more than "Children and Child-Like characters".

February 19, 2015, 03:13:32 PM

It's about the body type. I was allowed to post Azula r34 because she has the figure of a grown adult. Medli looks like a little kid. Not that hard of a distinction to figure out.

Flee · February 19, 2015, 04:48:53 PM

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

Turkey · February 20, 2015, 07:32:40 PM

So if an underage girl looks like an adult, it's all good? Keep telling yourself that.

Mat Cauthon · February 20, 2015, 07:38:44 PM

Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on February 20, 2015, 07:32:40 PM

So if an underage girl looks like an adult, it's all good? Keep telling yourself that.

I said that too.
But it's the looks that count.

As it was pointed out to me by both Flee and Psy, even if she looks young and has an age listed as over 19, it's still childporn.
But if she's 14 with a mature body, that's perfectly ok.

Mr. Psychologist · February 20, 2015, 07:58:47 PM

Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on February 20, 2015, 07:32:40 PM

So if an underage girl looks like an adult, it's all good? Keep telling yourself that.

It's the unfortunate mirror effect of banning lolis regardless of their stated age.
As it has been explained to me, legally speaking it's somewhat irrelevant if the character's age is stated to be 9 or 900 - it's to do with whether or not the image is depicting a child in a pornographic manner.

If there is a drawing of a girl that looks like an adult but the stated age is 14 or w/e then that's not counted under the same rules/laws as the above.

When it comes to real people though, of course it matters. That much goes without saying.

Girl of Mystery · February 20, 2015, 08:28:23 PM

Shut up you fucking paedo

Loli is loli. If you want to see that shit go somewhere else

February 20, 2015, 08:40:16 PM

Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on February 20, 2015, 07:32:40 PM

So if an underage girl looks like an adult, it's all good?

Of course.

Turkey · February 20, 2015, 11:46:21 PM

Quote from: SecondClass on February 20, 2015, 08:40:16 PM

Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on February 20, 2015, 07:32:40 PM
So if an underage girl looks like an adult, it's all good?

Of course.

How old is Azula, actually? I always pegged her as 18-25.

February 21, 2015, 12:58:54 AM

Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on February 20, 2015, 11:46:21 PM

Quote from: SecondClass on February 20, 2015, 08:40:16 PM
Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on February 20, 2015, 07:32:40 PM
So if an underage girl looks like an adult, it's all good?

Of course.

How old is Azula, actually? I always pegged her as 18-25.

14. But you'd never guess that.

Turkey · February 21, 2015, 01:00:16 AM

Quote from: SecondClass on February 21, 2015, 12:58:54 AM

Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on February 20, 2015, 11:46:21 PM
Quote from: SecondClass on February 20, 2015, 08:40:16 PM
Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on February 20, 2015, 07:32:40 PM
So if an underage girl looks like an adult, it's all good?

Of course.

How old is Azula, actually? I always pegged her as 18-25.
14. But you'd never guess that.

That's insane. Her voice alone sounds like an adult's.

big sponge · February 21, 2015, 03:55:02 AM

Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on February 21, 2015, 01:00:16 AM

Quote from: SecondClass on February 21, 2015, 12:58:54 AM
Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on February 20, 2015, 11:46:21 PM
Quote from: SecondClass on February 20, 2015, 08:40:16 PM
Quote from: HurtfulTurkey on February 20, 2015, 07:32:40 PM
So if an underage girl looks like an adult, it's all good?

Of course.

How old is Azula, actually? I always pegged her as 18-25.
14. But you'd never guess that.

That's insane. Her voice alone sounds like an adult's.

She's an adult in everything but age because it needs to be marketed to kids. In the eyes of the law though its the looks that matter when it comes to fictional people.

Flee · February 21, 2015, 05:30:21 AM

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

Mattie G Indahouse · March 01, 2015, 10:37:51 AM

Quote from: BritishLemön on February 20, 2015, 08:28:23 PM

Shut up you fucking paedo

Loli is loli. If you want to see that shit go somewhere else

Where did I say I want to see that shit in anarchy? I simply said the rule should be explained better so you're not going to have people like Jim getting banned from it due to vague writing.

Flee · March 01, 2015, 10:56:52 AM

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

Mattie G Indahouse · March 01, 2015, 05:12:50 PM

Quote from: Flee on March 01, 2015, 10:56:52 AM

Quote from: BerzerkCommando on March 01, 2015, 10:37:51 AM
Quote from: BritishLemön on February 20, 2015, 08:28:23 PM
Shut up you fucking paedo

Loli is loli. If you want to see that shit go somewhere else
Where did I say I want to see that shit in anarchy? I simply said the rule should be explained better so you're not going to have people like Jim getting banned from it due to vague writing.
Jim knew what he was doing.

He sure did...

Flee · March 01, 2015, 05:19:07 PM

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.

Mattie G Indahouse · March 01, 2015, 05:29:40 PM

Quote from: Flee on March 01, 2015, 05:19:07 PM

Quote from: BerzerkCommando on March 01, 2015, 05:12:50 PM
Quote from: Flee on March 01, 2015, 10:56:52 AM
Quote from: BerzerkCommando on March 01, 2015, 10:37:51 AM
Quote from: BritishLemön on February 20, 2015, 08:28:23 PM
Shut up you fucking paedo

Loli is loli. If you want to see that shit go somewhere else
Where did I say I want to see that shit in anarchy? I simply said the rule should be explained better so you're not going to have people like Jim getting banned from it due to vague writing.
Jim knew what he was doing.
He sure did...
Maybe he didn't know he would get kicked out of Anarchy for it, but I strongly doubt he didn't realize that posting such loli porn would escape the rules just because what's clearly a preteen girl just so happens to have wings.

His post implies he didn't know that humanoid loli was banned. Like I said the no loli rule is vague.

Flee · March 01, 2015, 05:42:13 PM

This user has been blacklisted from posting on the forums. Until the blacklist is lifted, all posts made by this user have been hidden and require a Sep7agon^® SecondClass Premium Membership to view.