This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Gunt
1
« on: July 06, 2016, 10:57:08 PM »
He was talking about Bush with that sentence.
Thanks. Still applicable to both, imo.
2
« on: July 06, 2016, 09:54:08 PM »
Guys you don't have to be a mad genius to be corrupt.
Yea, when you have a person that's willing to not only break the law, but have her email server be less secure than fucking gmail. Then you're an idiot. The FBI's main reasons for indictment is because she had not commit, "intentional misconduct or indications of disloyalty to the United States or efforts to obstruct justice" misconduct = is the illegal server Disloyalty = innocent Justice = Tried to delete emails, sounds like obstructing to me. http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/06/us/politics/hillary-clinton-fbi-email-comey.html?_r=0
3
« on: July 03, 2016, 03:03:23 AM »
normal. You straight af.
4
« on: June 25, 2016, 01:44:55 PM »
Good for you. But I don't quite understand you, you go from a broken down guy, to a hyped up meathead.
Broken down? I think you are confused
How? I thought I've seen you post and talk about really sentimental things about you (Emotional guy), then turn into pussy slayer 360.
5
« on: June 23, 2016, 10:27:36 PM »
Good for you. But I don't quite understand you, you go from a broken down guy, to a hyped up meathead.
6
« on: June 23, 2016, 08:15:02 AM »
"you look like you might have been hot if you were a girl"
IGN 10/10
7
« on: June 22, 2016, 09:59:44 AM »
wtf, is this a joke? I hope so.
8
« on: June 22, 2016, 09:56:25 AM »
I have no clue what an alt is.
Alternate account.
9
« on: June 22, 2016, 09:52:48 AM »
When people still use the year as an argument. lmao.
10
« on: June 22, 2016, 09:44:30 AM »
spooky4me
11
« on: June 21, 2016, 08:41:56 PM »
You're so brave!
12
« on: June 21, 2016, 08:40:59 PM »
Wow deep. Why are we even here?
13
« on: June 21, 2016, 08:37:53 PM »
Good job, Master Shredder.
14
« on: June 20, 2016, 02:55:21 PM »
And she should still be president over Trump.
What is your point?
I've already gone over her horrendous record, but no, I'd take Trump over Clinton. Trump is hated by Democrats and Republicans. He wouldn't be able to pass shit. Obama is left, but he also leans towards the center-right and even he had hard time. So yea, I'd take Trump, he would get locked down by the Republicans.
15
« on: June 20, 2016, 02:36:05 PM »
Islam allows slavery, stonings, killing gays, wife beatings, woman's testimony is half that of a man's, etc. It's a barbaric fucking religion, anyone saying otherwise either practices a cherry picked version or is lying.
16
« on: June 20, 2016, 02:29:51 PM »
Simple. She has been exposed many times, congrats on anyone that supports her. Her emails and now proof that Bernie supporters were right. Surprise, surprise she's corrupt, just like we predicted. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hFeOL-Bbdcc
17
« on: June 19, 2016, 08:07:04 PM »
Even with context Islam is a horrid religion.
Islam grants stoning, wife beatings, kill infidels, slaves, women's testimony is half that of a man, etc.
Islam has no place in the West. Fuck off.
18
« on: June 19, 2016, 07:59:23 PM »
what the fuck.. call the cops or something and get him out lol
What are the police gonna do? Shoot a tornado.
19
« on: June 13, 2016, 03:20:22 PM »
woah, wtf....
20
« on: June 12, 2016, 12:18:21 PM »
#ReligionOfPeace
21
« on: June 11, 2016, 07:46:27 PM »
If that was the only reason, yea, that's fucked up.
That is the only reason. Literally the whole reason it's so evil.
How do you know for sure?
Because it's a fact. Women aren't allowed to serve in the military in a combat role. The reason being their gender.
Well, their sex does indicate how strong/fast they'd be. I can't find anything here that indicates sexism or fear of it other than people not wanting it to be "like highschool", and fears of sexual assault. I got that from an article I was reading. I don't know, it all looks pretty messy.
22
« on: June 11, 2016, 07:35:01 PM »
If that was the only reason, yea, that's fucked up.
That is the only reason. Literally the whole reason it's so evil.
How do you know for sure?
23
« on: June 11, 2016, 07:29:02 PM »
generalizing an entire gender as unfit to be soldiers is far from moral. It's irrelevant.
Your moral code is the worst on this site, easily. This is one of the largest American travesties in modern history.
Coming from the anarchist junky
Not an anarchist, and there's nothing morally wrong with doing drugs. Try again.
HAHAHA
If a 12 year old wants to be a prostitute and had consensual sex with 40 year old men in exchange for heroin, would you consider that moral?
No, because the 12 year old is beneath the age of consent.
If you change the age to 18, there's absolutely nothing immoral with that.
You're a joke.
Morality revolves around consent.
Way to ignore my far more important post, though, the one where I proved your sexist way of thinking should make you ashamed.
I'm in the middle of writing my reply.
You realize I have a life and I'm doing things in between talking to you right? Not all of us are junkies who sit around all day injecting themselves with poison.
Most people don't reply to a later comment before they reply to an earlier one.
Just common sense.
I'd doubt the majority of women would be competent enough to serve. Also, why can't questioning Unit Cohesion be a valid question? Don't men communicate differently? Also, I'd imagine feeling the need to protect a female/anyone from someone/something is somewhat innate. Considering, men had to do so for thousands of years, not 'cuz of sexism, but because women are the weaker sex.
"Yeah, and the majority of men aren't competent enough to serve."Physically, wise. Probably, due to the level of obesity and how unhealthy people are nowadays. Which boot camp would fix. They'd still have the genetic potential of being strong enough, the majority of women do not have that potential.
"I'm talking about the minority of women who pass the physical test."I don't see the problem, I'd just like more research on communication. " biological urges doesn't mean we have to embrace that shittiness "We have these urges because we've survived for thousands of years with such urges. But if women can physically perform, and more research on communication shows everything a ok, than go for it. "You're uncomfortable there's a woman in your unit? Fucking deal with it. "No, I going off of this from a scientific angle. "The woman who spends her whole life training to be a soldier, aces all the test, and then finds out she can't do shit because she doesn't have a dick is far more than uncomfortable." If that was the only reason, yea, that's fucked up. But knowing the two sexes communicate differently is important, you know. Considering, military life revolves around communicating the way men do and to be as effective as possible as a team.
24
« on: June 11, 2016, 07:15:42 PM »
I'd doubt the majority of women would be competent enough to serve. Also, why can't questioning Unit Cohesion be a valid question? Don't men communicate differently? Also, I'd imagine feeling the need to protect a female/anyone from someone/something is somewhat innate. Considering, men had to do so for thousands of years, not 'cuz of sexism, but because women are the weaker sex.
26
« on: June 10, 2016, 08:08:38 PM »
Possibility, or he could make it too burdensome to stay. Either or. Unless, he's stated otherwise.
You should want to make the system better. Not so bad people leave.
It isn't that the system is bad, it's that companies prefer cheaper alternatives. There's nothing bad about paying fair taxes, and paying your employees fairly. Companies don't give a shit about any of that, so leave. All they care about is profit.
27
« on: June 10, 2016, 07:55:13 PM »
>.>
Your post doesn't have any punctuation, Verby.
as a personal choice
i don't think he chooses to make his posts awkward to read
lol I didn't think it mattered
28
« on: June 10, 2016, 07:37:11 PM »
your syntax pisses me off
Use punctuation right
Me?
29
« on: June 10, 2016, 06:10:06 PM »
App developer. I'd have a large market, plenty of ideas for apps (Both could be practical or entertainment), and finally, everyone wants to make the next 'flappy bird' app. That shit made serious money. But I'm kinda stuck because I love animals/discovery. So Veterinarian, or researcher. Fuck... So yeah, it's hard for me to narrow down shit.
30
« on: June 10, 2016, 05:40:27 PM »
Even though Trump is advocating for quite a lot of that crap. His only appeal is saying he won't go to war and will stop trades, which will somehow bring back all the jobs.
Even though, he's a hypocrite in that regard (Jobs). He does plenty of business in China. Though, I'd argue more jobs for America, the better. Making it more beneficial to stay in America, or make it too burdensome to leave.
I don't understand your point. He'd just take regulations off of Wall Street again and make the big businesses profit.
Possibility, or he could make it too burdensome to stay. Either or. Unless, he's stated otherwise.
|
Show Posts