This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Ingy
Pages: 1 ... 423424425 426427 ... 485
12721
« on: January 26, 2015, 03:07:48 PM »
12722
« on: January 26, 2015, 03:03:14 PM »
12723
« on: January 25, 2015, 07:45:42 PM »
Good
12724
« on: January 25, 2015, 07:40:26 PM »
inb4lock
12725
« on: January 25, 2015, 07:26:00 PM »
What was the response?
 Uh
12726
« on: January 25, 2015, 07:23:48 PM »
 lol
12727
« on: January 25, 2015, 06:41:43 PM »
 Seen it happening before it even happens
12728
« on: January 25, 2015, 06:36:45 PM »
Drew Karpyshyn
Is a big guy.
For you
12729
« on: January 25, 2015, 06:36:10 PM »
Don't fall for it!
Do it I won't cheat you out of your like
12730
« on: January 25, 2015, 06:33:11 PM »
 Like the OP and I will like your reply Simple as that
12731
« on: January 25, 2015, 06:28:28 PM »
 She said she was 18 I swear
12732
« on: January 25, 2015, 06:27:07 PM »
Once upon a time, there was a faggot
His name was OP
THE END
12733
« on: January 25, 2015, 06:25:32 PM »
Weak
12734
« on: January 25, 2015, 06:24:49 PM »
I truly mean this in a nice way:
Spoiler You're really annoying I mean this in the nicest way possible
12735
« on: January 25, 2015, 06:22:57 PM »
Indeed we do, but remember that sprinting isn't allowed in this race.
It's an equal opportunities zombie shuffle.
12736
« on: January 25, 2015, 06:22:16 PM »
 : )
12737
« on: January 25, 2015, 06:21:10 PM »
Amen
12738
« on: January 25, 2015, 06:15:44 PM »
 Try getting laid >.>
12739
« on: January 25, 2015, 06:09:05 PM »
Naming himself after an adjective and having an edgy profile picture
12740
« on: January 25, 2015, 05:26:56 PM »
He come to me with money in his hand
He offered me, I didn't ask him
I wasn't knocking someone's door down, I was running from that
When I got out, I was in that
I was already through that, I had that
I had the studio. I went to the studio
I went to Fox studios. I had it all, and I looked at it and said, 'This is a bigger jail than I just got out of'
I don't want to take my time going to work
I got a motorcycle and a sleeping bag
And ten or fifteen girls
What the hell I wanna go off into -- and go to work for?
Work for what, money? I got all the money in the world
I'm the king, man
I run the underworld, guy
I decide who does what and where they do it at
What am I gonna run around and act like I'm some teenybopper somewhere, for somebody else's money?
I make the money, man. I roll the nickels
The game is mine
I deal the cards
12741
« on: January 25, 2015, 05:22:25 PM »
 I'm moist
12742
« on: January 25, 2015, 04:34:32 PM »
12743
« on: January 25, 2015, 04:22:34 PM »
Ketsu Wo Tubere
12744
« on: January 25, 2015, 01:09:35 PM »
Ye
12745
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:56:34 PM »
Since this is the kind of question a preschooler with not even a sliver of knowledge about biology would ask, you will be referred to as such;
Our brains are very important. Like many of our body parts, we couldn't live without them. Our hearts wouldn't pump, and our lungs wouldn't breathe. Our ears wouldn't hear and our fingers wouldn't feel or even move! This is because brains are the control centers for our bodies.
Our brain gives commands to parts of our body, and often, we don't have to even think about those commands for them to happen. Our brains tell our hearts to beat all on their own, which is a very good thing! Otherwise, we'd have to remember to make our hearts beat every second of every day. We wouldn't be able to sleep!
When we squeeze our fingers into a fist, it's because our brain is telling the muscles in our hand to squeeze. It sends these signals by using the nerves in our body. Nerves are pathways for small electrical signals (that are far too weak to hurt us!) These signals travel from our brain and go to every part of our bodies.
Other times signals travel in reverse, from all of our body parts back to our brains. These signals can tell our brains what we feel. If we touch an ice cube, a signal goes from our fingers to our brains, saying, "This is soooo cold!" If you get a scrape on your knee, a signal goes from your knee to your brain, saying, "Ouch! That hurt! Please don't do that again."
Our brains also remember things and learn things. That way we can use things we've felt and learned in the past to help us make smart decisions about the future!
Why would you even take the time to respond to this
12746
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:55:26 PM »
to suck on
Beat me to it. Also,
/thread
Need to argue Hue hue hue
12747
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:55:08 PM »
That's like asking why we have feet.
We have feet to stand
Why do we have toes though?
No, our legs are for standing.
Lol try standing without your feet
Lol try standing without your toes
I'm pretty sure I can get use to standing with an inch off my foot
Lol try surviving with only walking like a moron anywhere between 1000 bc-1600 ad
That sentence made no logical sense
Not if you consider that you're trying to compensate for no toes. If you have no toes, you can't walk normally, and thus sprinting would prove even harder.
How would you move around efficiently? How would you hunt, and fight? How would you work without being able to walk normally?
Lol sure I would have trouble for a couple of days but I'm sure I can get use to it
It's just an inch off my feet which really isn't much
Fine, then chop of your toes. Eventually, they should stop existing in your line of predecessors. If not, then the toe will still be there, because they serve a function. There's no reason for it to disappear, so it won't, but if you give it a reason for long enough, then it will.
What the fuck kind of logic is this?
You do know that toes use to be longer and used for climbing when we were apes right?
And the reason we still have them is because evolution hasn't gotten rid of them yet?
Speaking of evolution, do you even know the first thing about it or are you using Lamarck's logic?
Chopping off your toes won't mean that your children are born without toes lol
And you meant successors, not predecessors
Don't try to make me seem retarded when you can't get facts straight yourself
"And the reason we still have them is because evolution hasn't gotten rid of them yet?"
please stop repeating my words, jackass.
So you're telling me that your successors won't be influenced by anything that their predecessors did, and went through?
Then tell me, why are some more hairy than others? Our bodies adapt, and our brains are adjusted ever so slightly. Exercising alters the DNA, so I imagine exercising different parts of your body for millions of years would have an effect, which would make the toes useless. Your dna would be altered for less space taken up by the toes, and eventually they'd disappear.
The only thing I got wrong was the predecessor part.
Are you retarded?
No
Children are not affected by what their parents went through
They receive a "base model" blueprint of a human from their parents
You are using Lamarck's logic right now
Even worse, you're trying to play off your retarded logic as truth
Read this
http://necsi.edu/projects/evolution/lamarck/intro./lamarck_intro.html
The last three sections
I know how evolution works.
Scientists know that certain genes become active or quieter as a result of exercise.
Not exercising certain parts for millions of years will most definitely have an effect, don't you think?
This is my argument; it is not complex, so please realize that. If you can't understand it, then I end this discussion now, because there'd be no point to it.
Not exercising certain parts for millions of years will most definitely have an effect, don't you think?
So why did you say that my children won't have any toes if I chop off my own?
And this directly contradicts your earlier point of saying that the children will be affected by what the parents go through
When did I say that? Might have done it without realizing, but it was a small mistake, and you should ignore it, because I've repeated my points enough times for you to understand it.
They will be affected.
It's not like they'll lose their toes, or that there will be any changes, but they will be affected on a microscopical level. It might be that a small adenine strand will be 1 mm to the left, if the size of the strand was 10 km wide, and 20 km long.
Still, it is a change none the less.
Ok so?
How does that prove your point?
Or was your point only to make me look idiotic?
My point is to come in with an idea, and then back it up by eradicating all doubts. If the doubt is not eradicated within myself, then I will accept it as a loss until proven otherwise. Until then however, I will take any point that anyone throws at me and reciprocate.
That's great
Now how does it prove your point?
So you're gonna ignore my reply, and ask for me to retype it?
Well maybe if you were better at getting your point across...
12748
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:38:20 PM »
That's like asking why we have feet.
We have feet to stand
Why do we have toes though?
No, our legs are for standing.
Lol try standing without your feet
Lol try standing without your toes
I'm pretty sure I can get use to standing with an inch off my foot
Lol try surviving with only walking like a moron anywhere between 1000 bc-1600 ad
That sentence made no logical sense
Not if you consider that you're trying to compensate for no toes. If you have no toes, you can't walk normally, and thus sprinting would prove even harder.
How would you move around efficiently? How would you hunt, and fight? How would you work without being able to walk normally?
Lol sure I would have trouble for a couple of days but I'm sure I can get use to it
It's just an inch off my feet which really isn't much
Fine, then chop of your toes. Eventually, they should stop existing in your line of predecessors. If not, then the toe will still be there, because they serve a function. There's no reason for it to disappear, so it won't, but if you give it a reason for long enough, then it will.
What the fuck kind of logic is this?
You do know that toes use to be longer and used for climbing when we were apes right?
And the reason we still have them is because evolution hasn't gotten rid of them yet?
Speaking of evolution, do you even know the first thing about it or are you using Lamarck's logic?
Chopping off your toes won't mean that your children are born without toes lol
And you meant successors, not predecessors
Don't try to make me seem retarded when you can't get facts straight yourself
"And the reason we still have them is because evolution hasn't gotten rid of them yet?"
please stop repeating my words, jackass.
So you're telling me that your successors won't be influenced by anything that their predecessors did, and went through?
Then tell me, why are some more hairy than others? Our bodies adapt, and our brains are adjusted ever so slightly. Exercising alters the DNA, so I imagine exercising different parts of your body for millions of years would have an effect, which would make the toes useless. Your dna would be altered for less space taken up by the toes, and eventually they'd disappear.
The only thing I got wrong was the predecessor part.
Are you retarded?
No
Children are not affected by what their parents went through
They receive a "base model" blueprint of a human from their parents
You are using Lamarck's logic right now
Even worse, you're trying to play off your retarded logic as truth
Read this
http://necsi.edu/projects/evolution/lamarck/intro./lamarck_intro.html
The last three sections
I know how evolution works.
Scientists know that certain genes become active or quieter as a result of exercise.
Not exercising certain parts for millions of years will most definitely have an effect, don't you think?
This is my argument; it is not complex, so please realize that. If you can't understand it, then I end this discussion now, because there'd be no point to it.
Not exercising certain parts for millions of years will most definitely have an effect, don't you think?
So why did you say that my children won't have any toes if I chop off my own?
And this directly contradicts your earlier point of saying that the children will be affected by what the parents go through
When did I say that? Might have done it without realizing, but it was a small mistake, and you should ignore it, because I've repeated my points enough times for you to understand it.
They will be affected.
It's not like they'll lose their toes, or that there will be any changes, but they will be affected on a microscopical level. It might be that a small adenine strand will be 1 mm to the left, if the size of the strand was 10 km wide, and 20 km long.
Still, it is a change none the less.
Ok so?
How does that prove your point?
Or was your point only to make me look idiotic?
My point is to come in with an idea, and then back it up by eradicating all doubts. If the doubt is not eradicated within myself, then I will accept it as a loss until proven otherwise. Until then however, I will take any point that anyone throws at me and reciprocate.
That's great Now how does it prove your point?
12749
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:36:49 PM »
That's like asking why do we have heads
Are you aware of your stupidity?
How do the two even connect?
Try connecting what you said. If you don't have a head, then you don't have a brain = question unsolved
You're just furthering this, for no reason other than that you're trying to imitate my response. You fail however.
...
Are you retarded?
Can you not tell that I'm just copying what you said in my thread instead of actually trying to be serious?
Or do you always try to twist my words for no other reason than to hate me?
Are you retarded?
Can you not read that I included that you're trying to copy what I said in your thread?
Or are you just always trying to enjoy life so much that you don't think? Perhaps you're only capable of rudimentary thinking.
Lol wtf
You can't think of shit
The only thinking that happens when you respond to me is "how can I post something to make him seem stupid?" and they come off as very poor replies
The only thinking that relates to stupidity is happening when I'm reading your replies.
Such a good counter argument
Good job OP you win
It's only reasonable to give up when you've lost.
Good for you.
>taking me seriously
I have never in my life taken a clown seriously.
Well you seem to be taking yourself pretty seriously
Care to give an example of me taking myself seriously?
You're full of shit, and nothing to back it up.
Uh
Every time I post something, you always feel compelled to try and tear it apart
And as for nothing to back it up, lol
You're the one who always replies with an insult instead of actually countering my point
That doesn't mean I think of myself as good.
How would I make a good insult without considering your point?
now you're leaking
Uh no You reply to me with no other intention than hating on me instead of actually responding to what I said
12750
« on: January 25, 2015, 12:35:36 PM »
That's like asking why we have feet.
We have feet to stand
Why do we have toes though?
No, our legs are for standing.
Lol try standing without your feet
Lol try standing without your toes
I'm pretty sure I can get use to standing with an inch off my foot
Lol try surviving with only walking like a moron anywhere between 1000 bc-1600 ad
That sentence made no logical sense
Not if you consider that you're trying to compensate for no toes. If you have no toes, you can't walk normally, and thus sprinting would prove even harder.
How would you move around efficiently? How would you hunt, and fight? How would you work without being able to walk normally?
Lol sure I would have trouble for a couple of days but I'm sure I can get use to it
It's just an inch off my feet which really isn't much
Fine, then chop of your toes. Eventually, they should stop existing in your line of predecessors. If not, then the toe will still be there, because they serve a function. There's no reason for it to disappear, so it won't, but if you give it a reason for long enough, then it will.
What the fuck kind of logic is this?
You do know that toes use to be longer and used for climbing when we were apes right?
And the reason we still have them is because evolution hasn't gotten rid of them yet?
Speaking of evolution, do you even know the first thing about it or are you using Lamarck's logic?
Chopping off your toes won't mean that your children are born without toes lol
And you meant successors, not predecessors
Don't try to make me seem retarded when you can't get facts straight yourself
"And the reason we still have them is because evolution hasn't gotten rid of them yet?"
please stop repeating my words, jackass.
So you're telling me that your successors won't be influenced by anything that their predecessors did, and went through?
Then tell me, why are some more hairy than others? Our bodies adapt, and our brains are adjusted ever so slightly. Exercising alters the DNA, so I imagine exercising different parts of your body for millions of years would have an effect, which would make the toes useless. Your dna would be altered for less space taken up by the toes, and eventually they'd disappear.
The only thing I got wrong was the predecessor part.
Are you retarded?
No
Children are not affected by what their parents went through
They receive a "base model" blueprint of a human from their parents
You are using Lamarck's logic right now
Even worse, you're trying to play off your retarded logic as truth
Read this
http://necsi.edu/projects/evolution/lamarck/intro./lamarck_intro.html
The last three sections
I know how evolution works.
Scientists know that certain genes become active or quieter as a result of exercise.
Not exercising certain parts for millions of years will most definitely have an effect, don't you think?
This is my argument; it is not complex, so please realize that. If you can't understand it, then I end this discussion now, because there'd be no point to it.
Not exercising certain parts for millions of years will most definitely have an effect, don't you think?
So why did you say that my children won't have any toes if I chop off my own?
And this directly contradicts your earlier point of saying that the children will be affected by what the parents go through
When did I say that? Might have done it without realizing, but it was a small mistake, and you should ignore it, because I've repeated my points enough times for you to understand it.
They will be affected.
It's not like they'll lose their toes, or that there will be any changes, but they will be affected on a microscopical level. It might be that a small adenine strand will be 1 mm to the left, if the size of the strand was 10 km wide, and 20 km long.
Still, it is a change none the less.
Ok so? How does that prove your point? Or was your point only to make me look idiotic?
Pages: 1 ... 423424425 426427 ... 485
|
Show Posts
