This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - eggsalad
Pages: 1 ... 313233 3435 ... 84
961
« on: November 28, 2015, 01:27:13 PM »
removing tape from a dogs face is trivial
It's the fact she put it there in the first place you idiot.
Now go back to fetishing over your limb porn and trying to advocate fucking dogs. I don't think anything with regards to animals needs to be taken seriously from you.
Like verb said, it's ad hominem but i'll go there.
What is so awful about restricting it so it can't bark?
A muzzle does the same fucking thing yet you consider that humane.
also fucking lmao it's hilarious that you imitate verb immediately after my last post
I want you to do a little experiment for me.
Go and get some gorilla tape from the nearest DIY store.
Then wrap it around your bottom jaw and the top of your head, twice.
Then take it off.
Without scissors, water, soap or anything. Just rip it off.
See if you think that is in any way acceptable to do to a dog for anything, let alone fucking barking.
One of my dogs never shuts the fuck up, I mean never.
He's usually barking for a reason though, same way that babies cry for attention. If he doesn't need to go outside to piss, or is starving hungry because he didn't eat his dinner - you use a water squirter.
Harmless, unpleasant and above all safe to do so for your operant conditioning.
Short hair is very different from long hair with that junk. And I could gladly wrap that stuff around my thigh and say it's trivial.
The thigh is not as sensitive as your face and scalp, a dog's snout is a lot more sensitive than your leg.
The pain it will cause the dog is a lot more than you sticking some duct-tape on your leg, let alone the psychological pain of having it's owner do something so vindictive to the poor bastard.
Not so much behind the whiskers. The bridge and jaw are just skin over bone.
You did pass biology in school right?
Where exactly do you think the nerves in the whiskers travel to get to the brain?
A tesla-relay? Wifi?
Or along the bridge of the dog's face.
That's not how nerves work...the path to the brain isn't equally as sensitive as the original location...
Yeah no shit sherlock,
The bridge and jaw are just skin over bone.
Bit of a difference though, between a bit of skin and bone and having a neural pathway there.
well how come my puppy doesnt give a shit when i scratch him there that little asshole you probably know more than I so I guess I'll have to concede here
962
« on: November 28, 2015, 01:22:22 PM »
removing tape from a dogs face is trivial
It's the fact she put it there in the first place you idiot.
Now go back to fetishing over your limb porn and trying to advocate fucking dogs. I don't think anything with regards to animals needs to be taken seriously from you.
Like verb said, it's ad hominem but i'll go there.
What is so awful about restricting it so it can't bark?
A muzzle does the same fucking thing yet you consider that humane.
also fucking lmao it's hilarious that you imitate verb immediately after my last post
I want you to do a little experiment for me.
Go and get some gorilla tape from the nearest DIY store.
Then wrap it around your bottom jaw and the top of your head, twice.
Then take it off.
Without scissors, water, soap or anything. Just rip it off.
See if you think that is in any way acceptable to do to a dog for anything, let alone fucking barking.
One of my dogs never shuts the fuck up, I mean never.
He's usually barking for a reason though, same way that babies cry for attention. If he doesn't need to go outside to piss, or is starving hungry because he didn't eat his dinner - you use a water squirter.
Harmless, unpleasant and above all safe to do so for your operant conditioning.
Short hair is very different from long hair with that junk. And I could gladly wrap that stuff around my thigh and say it's trivial.
The thigh is not as sensitive as your face and scalp, a dog's snout is a lot more sensitive than your leg.
The pain it will cause the dog is a lot more than you sticking some duct-tape on your leg, let alone the psychological pain of having it's owner do something so vindictive to the poor bastard.
Not so much behind the whiskers. The bridge and jaw are just skin over bone.
You did pass biology in school right?
Where exactly do you think the nerves in the whiskers travel to get to the brain?
A tesla-relay? Wifi?
Or along the bridge of the dog's face.
That's not how nerves work...the path to the brain isn't equally as sensitive as the original location...
963
« on: November 28, 2015, 01:19:34 PM »
Completely different context, raping your dog to punish it is raping your dog.
Letting a dog fuck you in the butt isn't immoral.
964
« on: November 28, 2015, 01:18:17 PM »
removing tape from a dogs face is trivial
It's the fact she put it there in the first place you idiot.
Now go back to fetishing over your limb porn and trying to advocate fucking dogs. I don't think anything with regards to animals needs to be taken seriously from you.
Like verb said, it's ad hominem but i'll go there.
What is so awful about restricting it so it can't bark?
A muzzle does the same fucking thing yet you consider that humane.
also fucking lmao it's hilarious that you imitate verb immediately after my last post
Because a muzzle can be put on and taken off without causing physical pain to the dog?
The pain of removing tape is trivial.
you should really probably qualify this with recognition of the picture above
i know you already have technically but these guys don't understand that sort of thing
they can't think for themselves and they aren't going to let me think for them so why bother
you two are cute
many people disagree and thus, you two are the only enlightened ones.
You literally just stopped trying to address my questions and admittedly just spouted out ad-hominen. Yeah. You are absolutely the voice of authority.
965
« on: November 28, 2015, 01:16:48 PM »
removing tape from a dogs face is trivial
It's the fact she put it there in the first place you idiot.
Now go back to fetishing over your limb porn and trying to advocate fucking dogs. I don't think anything with regards to animals needs to be taken seriously from you.
Like verb said, it's ad hominem but i'll go there.
What is so awful about restricting it so it can't bark?
A muzzle does the same fucking thing yet you consider that humane.
also fucking lmao it's hilarious that you imitate verb immediately after my last post
Because a muzzle can be put on and taken off without causing physical pain to the dog?
The pain of removing tape is trivial.
And I'm sure the pain of having a dick shoved up its ass is also trivial.
I think that'd cause psychological effects that make it non-trivial.
Wait are you actually justifying bestiality here?
Uh, literally the opposite.
966
« on: November 28, 2015, 01:16:11 PM »
removing tape from a dogs face is trivial
It's the fact she put it there in the first place you idiot.
Now go back to fetishing over your limb porn and trying to advocate fucking dogs. I don't think anything with regards to animals needs to be taken seriously from you.
Like verb said, it's ad hominem but i'll go there.
What is so awful about restricting it so it can't bark?
A muzzle does the same fucking thing yet you consider that humane.
also fucking lmao it's hilarious that you imitate verb immediately after my last post
I want you to do a little experiment for me.
Go and get some gorilla tape from the nearest DIY store.
Then wrap it around your bottom jaw and the top of your head, twice.
Then take it off.
Without scissors, water, soap or anything. Just rip it off.
See if you think that is in any way acceptable to do to a dog for anything, let alone fucking barking.
One of my dogs never shuts the fuck up, I mean never.
He's usually barking for a reason though, same way that babies cry for attention. If he doesn't need to go outside to piss, or is starving hungry because he didn't eat his dinner - you use a water squirter.
Harmless, unpleasant and above all safe to do so for your operant conditioning.
Short hair is very different from long hair with that junk. And I could gladly wrap that stuff around my thigh and say it's trivial.
The thigh is not as sensitive as your face and scalp, a dog's snout is a lot more sensitive than your leg.
The pain it will cause the dog is a lot more than you sticking some duct-tape on your leg, let alone the psychological pain of having it's owner do something so vindictive to the poor bastard.
Not so much behind the whiskers. The bridge and jaw are just skin over bone.
967
« on: November 28, 2015, 01:13:32 PM »
removing tape from a dogs face is trivial
It's the fact she put it there in the first place you idiot.
Now go back to fetishing over your limb porn and trying to advocate fucking dogs. I don't think anything with regards to animals needs to be taken seriously from you.
Like verb said, it's ad hominem but i'll go there.
What is so awful about restricting it so it can't bark?
A muzzle does the same fucking thing yet you consider that humane.
also fucking lmao it's hilarious that you imitate verb immediately after my last post
Because a muzzle can be put on and taken off without causing physical pain to the dog?
The pain of removing tape is trivial.
And I'm sure the pain of having a dick shoved up its ass is also trivial.
I think that'd cause psychological effects that make it non-trivial.
968
« on: November 28, 2015, 01:12:22 PM »
removing tape from a dogs face is trivial
It's the fact she put it there in the first place you idiot.
Now go back to fetishing over your limb porn and trying to advocate fucking dogs. I don't think anything with regards to animals needs to be taken seriously from you.
Like verb said, it's ad hominem but i'll go there.
What is so awful about restricting it so it can't bark?
A muzzle does the same fucking thing yet you consider that humane.
also fucking lmao it's hilarious that you imitate verb immediately after my last post
I want you to do a little experiment for me.
Go and get some gorilla tape from the nearest DIY store.
Then wrap it around your bottom jaw and the top of your head, twice.
Then take it off.
Without scissors, water, soap or anything. Just rip it off.
See if you think that is in any way acceptable to do to a dog for anything, let alone fucking barking.
One of my dogs never shuts the fuck up, I mean never.
He's usually barking for a reason though, same way that babies cry for attention. If he doesn't need to go outside to piss, or is starving hungry because he didn't eat his dinner - you use a water squirter.
Harmless, unpleasant and above all safe to do so for your operant conditioning.
Short hair is very different from long hair with that junk. And I could gladly wrap that stuff around my thigh and say it's trivial.
969
« on: November 28, 2015, 01:10:09 PM »
removing tape from a dogs face is trivial
It's the fact she put it there in the first place you idiot.
Now go back to fetishing over your limb porn and trying to advocate fucking dogs. I don't think anything with regards to animals needs to be taken seriously from you.
Like verb said, it's ad hominem but i'll go there.
What is so awful about restricting it so it can't bark?
A muzzle does the same fucking thing yet you consider that humane.
also fucking lmao it's hilarious that you imitate verb immediately after my last post
Because a muzzle can be put on and taken off without causing physical pain to the dog?
The pain of removing tape is trivial.
you should really probably qualify this with recognition of the picture above
i know you already have technically but these guys don't understand that sort of thing
they can't think for themselves and they aren't going to let me think for them so why bother
970
« on: November 28, 2015, 01:04:45 PM »
removing tape from a dogs face is trivial
It's the fact she put it there in the first place you idiot.
Now go back to fetishing over your limb porn and trying to advocate fucking dogs. I don't think anything with regards to animals needs to be taken seriously from you.
Like verb said, it's ad hominem but i'll go there.
What is so awful about restricting it so it can't bark?
A muzzle does the same fucking thing yet you consider that humane.
also fucking lmao it's hilarious that you imitate verb immediately after my last post
Because a muzzle can be put on and taken off without causing physical pain to the dog?
The pain of removing tape is trivial.
971
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:59:39 PM »
removing tape from a dogs face is trivial
It's the fact she put it there in the first place you idiot.
Now go back to fetishing over your limb porn and trying to advocate fucking dogs. I don't think anything with regards to animals needs to be taken seriously from you.
Like verb said, it's ad hominem but i'll go there.
What is so awful about restricting it so it can't bark? A muzzle does the same fucking thing yet you consider that humane. also fucking lmao it's hilarious that you imitate verb immediately after my last post
972
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:57:20 PM »
Then you yell at the dog and tell it to shut the fuck up.
you literally dont understand how to train dogs lmao
I have never once had to put a muzzle on my dogs to get them to get them to stop barking.
yeah i don't either doesnt mean im calling the police over this
973
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:56:17 PM »
tbh its like people who claim animal abuse when someone scares their animals with halloween masks
Because a Halloween mask is the same as forcing a dogs mouth shut with tape and probably confusing and scaring the hell out of it as to why it can't do something as natural as open its mouth, is the same as wearing a spooky mask it'll probably look at once before walking away.
What a horrible comparison.
Excessive barking is a legitimately bad behavior.
So get it a muzzle, or properly train him. Don't tape his fucking mouth shut and then post it to facebook going "lol look at me!"
Ah yes, restricting movement with a muzzle instead of tape totally eliminates that poor dog's woes and confusion. One's crude and more uncomfortable and stings when you take it off yeah but it's fucking trivial.
This is a form of training. He barks too much, he gets muzzled.
Yes because taping a dogs mouth shut can't do anything bad
Let's listen to the person who was going on about saying dogs can consent and it's okay to fuck them. You're literally the new Maz of the group.
Ah yes I absolutely advocated it to that severity/neglect.
974
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:55:42 PM »
I'm honestly not surprised someone like Egg of all people is defending this. Forget thinking "Eh, maybe not let her handle that dog."
Just full on support it for the sake of going against the grain.
ah yeah not criminalizing something means advocating it to you jaz just because you follow the grain with every single opinion of yours and whenever you sense you might deviate you censor yourself doesn't mean you have to pull the hipster meme like it adds something to the conversation removing tape from a dogs face is trivial
975
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:52:18 PM »
Then you yell at the dog and tell it to shut the fuck up.
you literally dont understand how to train dogs lmao
976
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:51:41 PM »
tbh its like people who claim animal abuse when someone scares their animals with halloween masks
Because a Halloween mask is the same as forcing a dogs mouth shut with tape and probably confusing and scaring the hell out of it as to why it can't do something as natural as open its mouth, is the same as wearing a spooky mask it'll probably look at once before walking away.
What a horrible comparison.
Excessive barking is a legitimately bad behavior.
So get it a muzzle, or properly train him. Don't tape his fucking mouth shut and then post it to facebook going "lol look at me!"
Ah yes, restricting movement with a muzzle instead of tape totally eliminates that poor dog's woes and confusion. One's crude and more uncomfortable and stings when you take it off yeah but it's fucking trivial. This is a form of training. He barks too much, he gets muzzled.
977
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:47:25 PM »
tbh its like people who claim animal abuse when someone scares their animals with halloween masks
Because a Halloween mask is the same as forcing a dogs mouth shut with tape and probably confusing and scaring the hell out of it as to why it can't do something as natural as open its mouth, is the same as wearing a spooky mask it'll probably look at once before walking away.
What a horrible comparison.
Excessive barking is a legitimately bad behavior.
978
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:46:06 PM »
yeah tbh people act like any moderate uncomfort felt by an animal constitutes criminal charges
animal abuse is either a repeated behavior or severe trauma/pain
this is neither
Moderate uncomfort? Would you like me to put duct tape all over your hair, rip it off, and tell you it's moderately uncomfortable?
except you dont know how violently she ripped it off
it wouldnt even uproot like any hair either
itd just sting a little
which guess what people give their dogs trivial pain as a disciplinary measure all the fucking time
You just said we don't know how violently she ripped off the tape then went on to defend the use of tape because the process of removing it wouldn't have harmed the fur.
Explained that it'd have to removed fast to do real harm, which we can't say is what happened.
979
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:45:09 PM »
yeah tbh people act like any moderate uncomfort felt by an animal constitutes criminal charges
animal abuse is either a repeated behavior or severe trauma/pain
this is neither
Moderate uncomfort? Would you like me to put duct tape all over your hair, rip it off, and tell you it's moderately uncomfortable?
except you dont know how violently she ripped it off
it wouldnt even uproot like any hair either
itd just sting a little
which guess what people give their dogs trivial pain as a disciplinary measure all the fucking time
People who hurt dogs as disciplinary measure should not own dogs.
You're retarded. If our dog would nip or bite another dog or someone he needed a slap aside the head, because that needs to stop fucking immediately, not gradually with scolding or positive reinforcement.
980
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:43:38 PM »
tbh its like people who claim animal abuse when someone scares their animals with halloween masks
981
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:41:52 PM »
if the jedi suspected palpatine was a sith why didnt they just demand he take a blood test for his mediclorian count
Well, you see they went go see him about the whole thing and arrest him to do that, but he kinda killed them all.
why would they have to arrest him first
why couldnt they just bring that up in session
i mean the jedi are actually a resource used by the senate for official business, if they sense really strong sith presence in the senate it would be reasonable to have blood tests taken
The Jedi have no ground in the senate to bring that up during a meeting. Besides, it was urgent enough of an accusation that it needed to be investigated immediately. Hence, why they went into his office to arrest him, as the chosen one accusing Palps of being a sith lord after spending so much time together is pretty damn serious. He was going to be brought before the Senate, likely with the blood test they would've done had he been arrested and not killed everyone.
why didnt they bring a few more guys
or at least yknow had some people to verify the event
a sith lord is kind of a big deal i think they could spare more than 4 guys
4 of the best Jedi Masters on Coruscant
That's still pretty irresponsible and cocky.
Who else would they bring? If he could kill 3/4 Jedi Masters like no big deal, then who else would be worth bringing?
all they have to do is have someone to relay the message that palpatine started cutting shit up
palpatine couldnt stop them if he's busy getting his ass handed to him by mace
Well, they would be cocky then because they assumed their combined experience and combat prowess would be enough. The Jedi hadn't dealt with a Sith Lord in 2000 some years, clearly they weren't really aware of what they were getting into.
yoda a shit
982
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:40:31 PM »
yeah tbh people act like any moderate uncomfort felt by an animal constitutes criminal charges
animal abuse is either a repeated behavior or severe trauma/pain
this is neither
Moderate uncomfort? Would you like me to put duct tape all over your hair, rip it off, and tell you it's moderately uncomfortable?
except you dont know how violently she ripped it off it wouldnt even uproot like any hair either itd just sting a little which guess what people give their dogs trivial pain as a disciplinary measure all the fucking time
983
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:36:13 PM »
We do.
984
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:35:21 PM »
if the jedi suspected palpatine was a sith why didnt they just demand he take a blood test for his mediclorian count
Well, you see they went go see him about the whole thing and arrest him to do that, but he kinda killed them all.
why would they have to arrest him first
why couldnt they just bring that up in session
i mean the jedi are actually a resource used by the senate for official business, if they sense really strong sith presence in the senate it would be reasonable to have blood tests taken
The Jedi have no ground in the senate to bring that up during a meeting. Besides, it was urgent enough of an accusation that it needed to be investigated immediately. Hence, why they went into his office to arrest him, as the chosen one accusing Palps of being a sith lord after spending so much time together is pretty damn serious. He was going to be brought before the Senate, likely with the blood test they would've done had he been arrested and not killed everyone.
why didnt they bring a few more guys
or at least yknow had some people to verify the event
a sith lord is kind of a big deal i think they could spare more than 4 guys
4 of the best Jedi Masters on Coruscant
That's still pretty irresponsible and cocky.
Who else would they bring? If he could kill 3/4 Jedi Masters like no big deal, then who else would be worth bringing?
all they have to do is have someone to relay the message that palpatine started cutting shit up palpatine couldnt stop them if he's busy getting his ass handed to him by mace
985
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:31:36 PM »
if the jedi suspected palpatine was a sith why didnt they just demand he take a blood test for his mediclorian count
Well, you see they went go see him about the whole thing and arrest him to do that, but he kinda killed them all.
why would they have to arrest him first
why couldnt they just bring that up in session
i mean the jedi are actually a resource used by the senate for official business, if they sense really strong sith presence in the senate it would be reasonable to have blood tests taken
The Jedi have no ground in the senate to bring that up during a meeting. Besides, it was urgent enough of an accusation that it needed to be investigated immediately. Hence, why they went into his office to arrest him, as the chosen one accusing Palps of being a sith lord after spending so much time together is pretty damn serious. He was going to be brought before the Senate, likely with the blood test they would've done had he been arrested and not killed everyone.
why didnt they bring a few more guys
or at least yknow had some people to verify the event
a sith lord is kind of a big deal i think they could spare more than 4 guys
4 of the best Jedi Masters on Coruscant
That's still pretty irresponsible and cocky.
986
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:27:54 PM »
if the jedi suspected palpatine was a sith why didnt they just demand he take a blood test for his mediclorian count
Well, you see they went go see him about the whole thing and arrest him to do that, but he kinda killed them all.
why would they have to arrest him first
why couldnt they just bring that up in session
i mean the jedi are actually a resource used by the senate for official business, if they sense really strong sith presence in the senate it would be reasonable to have blood tests taken
The Jedi have no ground in the senate to bring that up during a meeting. Besides, it was urgent enough of an accusation that it needed to be investigated immediately. Hence, why they went into his office to arrest him, as the chosen one accusing Palps of being a sith lord after spending so much time together is pretty damn serious. He was going to be brought before the Senate, likely with the blood test they would've done had he been arrested and not killed everyone.
why didnt they bring a few more guys or at least yknow had some people to verify the event a sith lord is kind of a big deal i think they could spare more than 4 guys
987
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:17:22 PM »
And any image that is that significant is trivialized when you wear it like that.
how
it feels like the equivalent of toddlers drawing on themselves with markers to me
988
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:11:05 PM »
Pretty tacky.
No image really seems significant enough to warrant permanently wearing it.
And any image that is that significant is trivialized when you wear it like that.
989
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:10:06 PM »
the pain is pretty good tho
990
« on: November 28, 2015, 12:09:03 PM »
if the jedi suspected palpatine was a sith why didnt they just demand he take a blood test for his mediclorian count
Well, you see they went go see him about the whole thing and arrest him to do that, but he kinda killed them all.
why would they have to arrest him first why couldnt they just bring that up in session i mean the jedi are actually a resource used by the senate for official business, if they sense really strong sith presence in the senate it would be reasonable to have blood tests taken
Pages: 1 ... 313233 3435 ... 84
|
Show Posts