This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Pendulate
Pages: 1 ... 345 67 ... 16
121
« on: June 22, 2015, 07:28:47 AM »
Moral nihilism is, if I've got this right, a meta-ethical position; that's to say, it rejects moral universals in metaphysics or divine command theory. It doesn't necessarily reject moral realism, and I think the two can happily coexist, actually.
I don't think so. Moral nihilism is, by definition, an anti-realist philosophy in meta-ethics. It doesn't just reject moral universals, it rejects all positive moral claims.
Hmm, wouldn't that take it outside the realm of meta-ethics, then? I mean, you can reject meta-ethics while still accepting an empirically based moral framework, can't you?
122
« on: June 22, 2015, 07:03:32 AM »
I think the 'nihilism' you've got in your sights here is more the edgy teen pseudo-nihilism than the actual nihilist philosophy.
Moral nihilism is, if I've got this right, a meta-ethical position; that's to say, it rejects moral universals in metaphysics or divine command theory. It doesn't necessarily reject moral realism, and I think the two can happily coexist, actually.
Moral relativism, on the other hand, is complete nonsense.
123
« on: June 21, 2015, 11:05:01 PM »
Buzzcuts are like 10 bucks. Just go to the barber's.
124
« on: June 21, 2015, 10:48:19 PM »
125
« on: June 21, 2015, 10:44:09 PM »
Reviews are mixed, will give it a shot though
126
« on: June 21, 2015, 05:09:31 PM »
We have very little evidence as to how other animals feel and percieve things
I'm not entirely sure this is correct.
As a matter of subjectivity, I don't think we do. I mean, obviously we have reason to believe that animals with similar nervous systems to ours can feel in similar ways, but they are a small percentage of all animals, and I don't think we can ever truly know what it's like to be them. Verb's comment on how sentience requires the capacity to suffer is incredibly broad-brushed considering he wants to say that animals = have it but computers = won't have it.
127
« on: June 21, 2015, 04:30:37 PM »
Well if we're not using human experience as the yardstick, the concept of sentience breaks down pretty quickly for any part other than mere capacity to experience.
We have very little evidence as to how other animals feel and percieve things, though it's quite obvious that they differ depending on species.
All we concretely have to go by is the fact that they can experience.
128
« on: June 21, 2015, 04:11:49 PM »
I never said it wasn't a "vital component"--I'm saying that all it is is a component. It's not the only thing that defines sentience. Well, I'd say it's enough of a factor to define it for the purpose of this discussion. Unless you want to coin a new term for computer sentience (intelience? Swidt) then I don't think this is a misuse. I'd also take this to mean that you'd support sentient AI, in this case? Assuming they can't suffer in ways that we can, and they can perform complex tasks in short amounts of time?
129
« on: June 21, 2015, 03:57:46 PM »
i mean, i would just call that agency, not sentience
You don't think agency is a vital component of sentience? If you think an AI needs to think and feel in the same ways as we do in order to be deemed sentient, then no, we probably won't ever have sentient AI. If it just needs to be able to think for itself, and move beyond its man-made programming, then it's well within the realm of possibility.
130
« on: June 21, 2015, 03:46:01 PM »
If you accept that our brains are nothing more than complex networks of information processing, then you pretty much have to admit that sentience could emerge from other complex networks as well.
131
« on: June 21, 2015, 03:36:38 PM »
If sentience in AI were to happen, it would almost certainly be by accident. we can't give things by accident?
come on
don't be pedantic, you obviously know what i mean
No, I took you to mean that we'd intentionally endow a machine with sentience.
132
« on: June 21, 2015, 03:18:38 PM »
How exactly could we "give" something sentience? It's not some singular property that we'd insert into them like a battery. If sentience in AI were to happen, it would almost certainly be by accident.
133
« on: June 21, 2015, 03:07:44 PM »
The clues scattered throughout the books are too many. He's coming back, and he'll meet up with Dany and she'll give him his own dragon and they'll beat the whitewalkers. Then they'll kill Ramsay and Jon will stay at Winterfell with his dragon and marry Ygritte (Melisandre brings her back too that's part of the deal) and Dany will go to King's Landing and
134
« on: June 20, 2015, 07:49:40 PM »
The Office UK
Breaking Bad, but the ending was perhaps a little too perfect
Justified, in fact the whole season was perfect after a lackluster s5
Ah good, so it wasn't just me then. S5 seemed a bit dry >.>
Worst of the series, hands down. I know they had to set everything up for a Raylan v Boyd showdown in s6 but it was lazily executed. Shitty villians and plot threads that went nowhere. Thankfully 6 redeems itself and is the best of the series, imo
135
« on: June 20, 2015, 07:06:03 PM »
The Office UK
Breaking Bad, but the ending was perhaps a little too perfect
Justified, in fact the whole season was perfect after a lackluster s5
136
« on: June 20, 2015, 04:57:46 AM »
How do I check?
137
« on: June 20, 2015, 04:53:31 AM »
.
138
« on: June 20, 2015, 01:49:59 AM »
I'm a fan of stuff that's difficult to access at first but reveals itself over repeated listens, so yeah The drop in track 2 is breathtaking On a lighter note, Bon Iver's albums are pretty much perfect as well
139
« on: June 19, 2015, 10:14:54 PM »
I'd say critical thinking skills are one of the best measurements of intelligence.
Crunching numbers and solving brainteasers are impressive too, but I don't think they're anywhere near as important.
140
« on: June 19, 2015, 07:13:04 PM »
CONFIRMATION BIAS
141
« on: June 19, 2015, 07:09:48 PM »
6.173
6.192 after this
142
« on: June 19, 2015, 06:21:27 PM »
Yesss, I was hoping you'd use that one.
143
« on: June 19, 2015, 07:14:50 AM »
I hate that appeal to nature is considered a logical fallacy, it's the same basis as all of the ethical arguments Verb is making. A simple "this is what I believe in" Sorry, what? There's a huge difference between saying "this is what we should do because it prevents the suffering and exploitation of billions of animals" and "this is what we should do because nature". And yes, you require protein to function, and I an simply unable to eat all of the nuts and beans I would have to to make up the a diet with no meat. There are plenty of vegan protein sources. Rice, corn, tofu, tempeh, seeds, leafy greens, even vegan protein powders if you really need them. The protein excuse is not an excuse at all. You all seem to think in telling you not to be vegan, when really all I'm saying is that I simply can not be vegan.
No, you are trying to justify your laziness with flimsy excuses. If that seems direct, I'm sorry, but it's the truth. If you lack the willpower to become vegan*, then simply admit it. But don't make fallacious appeals to nature and present sloppy nutritional information to try and make your reasons more respectable than they are. * I really cannot fathom how people lack the willpower to go vegan when it is literally the easiest thing you can do if you care at all about living ethically, but okay.
144
« on: June 19, 2015, 04:54:33 AM »
If being a vegan was going to kill me tomorrow, I would still be a vegan.
Well I don't know about that. I want to make a positive contribution to the world. At least try and improve animal husbandry before kicking the bucket.
145
« on: June 19, 2015, 04:51:13 AM »
I was taking in plenty of glucose, and all of the other nutrients I needed, but my protein source was insufficient. So consume more protein. It's incredibly easy to get on a vegan diet. I need meat, or manmade fake meats to live and function. I'm sorry, but human physiology and nutritional science say that you don't. Excuse me for choosing the one that i evolved consuming.
That's a naturalistic fallacy.
146
« on: June 18, 2015, 11:49:09 PM »
I don't get it.
147
« on: June 18, 2015, 10:27:25 PM »
I try not to be.
148
« on: June 18, 2015, 10:24:53 PM »
It's funny how most of the time people give vegans shit for pushing their 'superior' diet on other people, yet the complete opposite is happening here.
Happens all the time. "Sorry man, I can't eat that. I'm vegan." "WOAH, don't go pushing your beliefs on me now!"
149
« on: June 18, 2015, 10:22:46 PM »
like I said, I had been eating plenty of nuts, and also beans. Nuts and beans =/= a healthy diet. It's no wonder you feel light-headed, because nuts are basically pure fat and your brain needs glucose to function properly.
150
« on: June 18, 2015, 09:54:11 PM »
Slushy ice.
Pages: 1 ... 345 67 ... 16
|