6901
Gaming / Re: Just Cause 3 is coming in 2015
« on: November 11, 2014, 03:34:23 PM »
There better be gas canisters I can fly.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 6901
Gaming / Re: Just Cause 3 is coming in 2015« on: November 11, 2014, 03:34:23 PM »
There better be gas canisters I can fly.
6902
Serious / Re: Nicki Minaj is apparently a Nazi« on: November 11, 2014, 03:21:36 PM »das racisHoly fuck those lyrics are god fucking awful sweet jesus titty crackers who the fuck actually likes this god awful shit sucking tripe?Black ppl 6903
Serious / Re: Safest city for 10 years running« on: November 11, 2014, 02:42:55 PM »RelevantSo what you're telling me is that we need to get rid of all the poor people? YouTube 6904
Serious / Re: Exactly why is it undesirable?« on: November 11, 2014, 01:49:47 PM »I'd just like to point out that the phrase "a well regulated militia" is very prominent within the Second Amendment.SHALL NOT BE INFRINGEDAs little as the constitution matters to me, I do think it should be noted that, in US law, this is really the most powerful argument against extreme regulation. There are lots of things that could infringe without totally banning. Occam's Razor. These arguments both commit a lot of assumptions. I don't even know what the latter post is even trying to convey.I'd just like to point out that the phrase "a well regulated militia" is very prominent within the Second Amendment.SHALL NOT BE INFRINGEDAs little as the constitution matters to me, I do think it should be noted that, in US law, this is really the most powerful argument against extreme regulation. There are lots of things that could infringe without totally banning. 6905
Serious / Re: Exactly why is it undesirable?« on: November 11, 2014, 01:28:25 PM »I'd just like to point out that the phrase "a well regulated militia" is very prominent within the Second Amendment.SHALL NOT BE INFRINGEDAs little as the constitution matters to me, I do think it should be noted that, in US law, this is really the most powerful argument against extreme regulation. There are lots of things that could infringe without totally banning. 6906
Serious / Re: Exactly why is it undesirable?« on: November 11, 2014, 01:22:47 PM »le charlton heston face :^]Nothing.SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED 6907
Serious / Re: Exactly why is it undesirable?« on: November 11, 2014, 01:17:42 PM »
Nothing.
There is however, something wrong with a completely unregulated, unmonitored accessibility to firearms. 6908
Serious / Re: Nicki Minaj is apparently a Nazi« on: November 11, 2014, 12:44:17 PM »I find the lyrics far more distasteful than the imagery. 6909
The Flood / Re: "All About That Bass" Parody« on: November 11, 2014, 12:26:42 PM »
I want to lick Meghan Trainor out until my tongue bleeds.
6910
Serious / Re: ITV caves in to SJW whining« on: November 11, 2014, 11:22:48 AM »Hmm, that guy was gonna have a gig at my Student's Union, but I think there's some sort of campaign to not have him here anymore.Absolutely no where near Frankie Boyle tier. He's practically Barry Chuckle compared to him. Sure, he makes the occasional vulgar "I'd bang her ahyuck hyuck kno what i mean ;^)" joke, but that's about as far is he goes. The furthest boundary I've ever seen him cross is like one rape joke he made. 6911
The Flood / Re: People we NEED to recruit« on: November 11, 2014, 11:14:21 AM »
Bardock
AcedannyK An average gamer 6912
The Flood / Re: Now this is Podracing!« on: November 11, 2014, 06:47:02 AM »
It's like poetry, it rhymes.
6913
Gaming / Re: But is Halo 5 really going to die?« on: November 11, 2014, 06:34:59 AM »
BUT MY HOPE WILL NEVER DIE
6914
The Flood / Re: 4chan faggots, what boards do you browse?« on: November 10, 2014, 06:32:33 PM »I only really go there for music general threads./tv//mu/ are literally always pretentious faggots 6915
The Flood / Re: 4chan faggots, what boards do you browse?« on: November 10, 2014, 06:20:46 PM »6916
The Flood / Re: 4chan faggots, what boards do you browse?« on: November 10, 2014, 06:19:46 PM »
/tv/
/pol/ occasionally /mu/ when they're not being pretentious faggots /s/ /d/ /fa/ 6917
Serious / ITV caves in to SJW whining« on: November 10, 2014, 03:38:35 PM »
http://www.itv.com/news/update/2014-11-10/itv-decides-not-to-continue-dapper-laughs-show/
For those of you that don't know, 'Dapper Laughs' is a TV show which depicts some random bellend that goes about making shit jokes about having sex with women. Essentially he's the UK equivalent of a glorified frat boy for you burgerclaps. Now, I don't particularly find him very funny, but I'm going to support him anyway because I don't think his show being lynched by the politically correct mob that basically want everything on TV to be silhouette cardboard cut outs, was warranted. Entertainment and art is supposed to be the appropriate venue for those kinds of thoughts to be vented, not stifled. Nothing will ever be enough for these fucking crybabies. 6918
The Flood / Re: only 1940s kids will get this« on: November 10, 2014, 01:06:35 PM »Only 66 million BC kids will get this. 6919
The Flood / Re: so i just saw interstellar« on: November 10, 2014, 12:10:05 PM »
WAS DISAGREEING WITH CRITICS PART OF YOUR PLAN?
6920
Serious / Re: Would extremely advanced AI find existence pointless?« on: November 10, 2014, 11:26:13 AM »YouTube relevant 6921
Serious / Re: Feminism video shows how the movement is getting worse« on: November 10, 2014, 10:53:41 AM »YouTube Lol FCKH8 are hypocritical twat nuggets. Their support of women's rights ends where transgender issues begin. Supposedly they've spewed a lot of transphobic rhetoric recently. 6922
Serious / Re: Unlike Americans, Brits think taxation is a moral duty« on: November 10, 2014, 04:02:08 AM »
I don't necessarily view it as a "moral obligation" but it's definitely something that is required for the basic functioning of society.
Saying that, I don't pay taxes, so I'm speaking from inexperience here. 6923
The Flood / Re: rapping about biscuits« on: November 10, 2014, 03:59:23 AM »
Don't be a fool when you dip em in your tea.
They're not that nice fo' you n' me. 6924
Serious / Re: Senate Prepares for Battle with EPA« on: November 10, 2014, 03:34:51 AM »The EPA is hell-bent on destroying the economy and creating another economic declineYa nailed it on the head Kinder. Saving the planet is actually an ulterior motive to destroy the economy because EPA are master rusemen. 6925
Serious / Re: Mom attacks woman over screaming child« on: November 10, 2014, 03:21:13 AM »Except they DO have control over the situation.Through expulsion essentially Quote They can either get their kid under control, or leave.Easier said than done Max. Quote Literally nobody wants to listen to a baby throw a tantrum or scream.If you can't handle a child throwing a little strop in public which deeply disturbs your tranquil shopping state for a couple minutes, then you really shouldn't be out in public in the first place. Get your shopping delivered or something. Quote If the parent has the ability to remedy the situation in one form or another, they should.If this were the case than parents would literally be unable to go anywhere with their children. 6926
Serious / Re: Mom attacks woman over screaming child« on: November 09, 2014, 02:19:14 PM »So you're essentially saying that parents should be kicked out of shops because of circumstances they have no control over, yes?Yes, that's exactly why a parent should remove their disruptive child from the area. It's called being a decent human being.lolNot saying the punch was justified, but sometimes you can't just shut up a screaming child at the flip of the switch. The majority of the time you just have to ignore their behaviour, which a lot of people don't seem to understand.And if that's the case, you should remove yourself and your child from the store. Anyone else making a scene would be asked to leave just the same. 6928
Serious / Re: Mom attacks woman over screaming child« on: November 08, 2014, 03:18:53 PM »lolNot saying the punch was justified, but sometimes you can't just shut up a screaming child at the flip of the switch. The majority of the time you just have to ignore their behaviour, which a lot of people don't seem to understand.And if that's the case, you should remove yourself and your child from the store. Anyone else making a scene would be asked to leave just the same. You are aware that children act like that out of their own volition, right? Their mental and behavioural faculties aren't fully developed yet. They aren't aware that is unacceptable conduct in public. 6929
The Flood / Re: Fuck my place of work« on: November 08, 2014, 02:42:43 PM »It's not really stressful, but it gets pretty boring after a couple hours. It's shit working weekends because there's always underage twats that try to get their grannies/mums to buy them alcohol, so according to the law I have to challenge them for ID, and they ALWAYS give me shit for it.on checkouts.What's that like? 6930
The Flood / Re: Fuck my place of work« on: November 08, 2014, 02:38:42 PM »
Ha, I work in ASDA on checkouts.
There was a fire alarm today because the bakery bellends somehow managed to set a box on fire. That was pretty entertaining for 45 minutes |