This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Mordo
Pages: 1 ... 177178179 180181 ... 243
5341
« on: March 25, 2015, 04:49:22 PM »
5342
« on: March 25, 2015, 12:47:55 PM »
Femininity in men should not be encourage or even accepted. It's wrong.
You serious?
I think what he means is that femininity shouldn't be placed with higher value than masculinity, especially in regards to boys who, as was aforementioned, tend to display masculine traits more than feminine traits on average. I don't think he actually objects to boys who are inherently feminine.
5343
« on: March 25, 2015, 12:37:12 PM »
If feminism benefits everyone, I'd like to see what feminists have done to help men.
The idea is that by getting rid of gender stereotypes, men would also no longer be forced into the "manly man" role that dictates that men always have to be strong, in charge and free of emotion and that while tomboyish girls are fine, feminine boys are unacceptable.
But the problem with this is that gender roles and stereotypes, on average, tend to actually be true. It's been scientifically documented that male children tend to gravitate towards boisterous and masculine toys such as cars and gadgets, whereas female children display a preference towards nurturing and caring with dolls like they would as mothers. Indeed, this isn't just exclusive to humanity, it's been recorded within the Animal Kingdom too.
The fact that feminism wants to dismantle this is highly unscientific and downright detrimental, to be perfectly honest.
It's not really about dismantling this though, it's about accepting more than just that. While it's obviously true that there's differences between male and female children and their interests in general, the fact that anything that strays from this is regarded as something obscene that should be discouraged and looked down upon is pretty shit and harmful to men just the same.
Which is usually brought about by religious conservative dogma, which I don't see feminism being able to combat any time soon. Honestly, what's needed is a gradual, cultural and educational shift to alleviate the stigmas attached to straying away from gender roles, not third wave "games and magazines are sexist" tumblr feminism which seems to be the norm now.
5344
« on: March 25, 2015, 12:16:56 PM »
If feminism benefits everyone, I'd like to see what feminists have done to help men.
The idea is that by getting rid of gender stereotypes, men would also no longer be forced into the "manly man" role that dictates that men always have to be strong, in charge and free of emotion and that while tomboyish girls are fine, feminine boys are unacceptable.
But the problem with this is that gender roles and stereotypes, on average, tend to actually be true. It's been scientifically documented that male children tend to gravitate towards boisterous and masculine toys such as cars and gadgets, whereas female children display a preference towards nurturing and caring with dolls like they would as mothers. Indeed, this isn't just exclusive to humanity, it's been recorded within the Animal Kingdom too.The fact that feminism wants to dismantle this is highly unscientific and downright detrimental, to be perfectly honest.
5345
« on: March 25, 2015, 12:07:31 PM »
5346
« on: March 25, 2015, 12:04:15 PM »
huh
he could very well pull this off
that is if he tones down the flamboyant geek acting he's become renown for
5347
« on: March 25, 2015, 11:24:12 AM »
Well Clarkson was in the wrong, and the BBC were well within their rights to drop him given his history.
I can only imagine how costly this whole situation will be for the BBC and his colleagues, most of all Hammond and May. They didn't deserve to bear the brunt of this.
5348
« on: March 24, 2015, 11:58:04 PM »
can you actually please stop
5349
« on: March 24, 2015, 11:24:51 PM »
fuck off back to /mu/ you cuck
5350
« on: March 24, 2015, 10:44:25 PM »
5351
« on: March 24, 2015, 04:56:55 PM »
 DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES DIE MUDSLIMES
5352
« on: March 24, 2015, 04:38:47 PM »
Good.
5353
« on: March 24, 2015, 03:23:14 PM »
theres still plenty of room to introduce the ironborn, and lets be honest, LSH was an asspull anyway, who cares if we never get her.
also, your other complaints are a bit odd. have you ever read the books?
What about them is odd exactly?
5354
« on: March 24, 2015, 02:07:40 PM »
also I am 100% sure Fury Road will destroy Episode VII both in terms of critical reception and actual quality.
That's what I'm feeling to. The trailer looks like it's trying to be as close as what the second movie which made Mad Max what it is today. The movie looks like it's trying to stay as close to the series while also being a reboot. Looking at the Star Wars trailer it seems like it's going to have a lot of stupid things in it. The giant speeder bike is something that should have stayed an idea.
Episode VII will likely be a fun movie but will be nothing that great That's how I see it to. It's going to be a fun movie for all ages but it's just going to stay as a fun movie. I know Mad Max is campy at times but Star Wars has a lot of it. Looking at the trailer that droid on the ball looks like it's going to be one of the campy things of it.
Plus George Miller is still doing Fury Road, and I think he's learned from Beyond Thunderdome and knows what to fix. The fact that the movie will be R shows already that he's not making Beyond Thunderdome 2.
Uh dude, I'm excited for the film too but lets not twist any facts. Fury Road will be PG-13, disappointingly.
nigga what I read it was R
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1392190/
http://www.enstarz.com/articles/43313/20140807/mad-max-fury-road-news-movie-to-release-with-a-pg-13-rating-video.htmThe BBFC also gave it a 12A, which is basically the bong equivalent of a PG-13.
5355
« on: March 24, 2015, 02:05:44 PM »
Weren't the Star Trek films relatively well received?
Amongst general audiences and critics. It disappointed a lot of die hard Trek fans though, with Into Darkness being voted as the worst Trek film.
5356
« on: March 24, 2015, 02:03:54 PM »
also I am 100% sure Fury Road will destroy Episode VII both in terms of critical reception and actual quality.
That's what I'm feeling to. The trailer looks like it's trying to be as close as what the second movie which made Mad Max what it is today. The movie looks like it's trying to stay as close to the series while also being a reboot. Looking at the Star Wars trailer it seems like it's going to have a lot of stupid things in it. The giant speeder bike is something that should have stayed an idea.
Episode VII will likely be a fun movie but will be nothing that great That's how I see it to. It's going to be a fun movie for all ages but it's just going to stay as a fun movie. I know Mad Max is campy at times but Star Wars has a lot of it. Looking at the trailer that droid on the ball looks like it's going to be one of the campy things of it.
Plus George Miller is still doing Fury Road, and I think he's learned from Beyond Thunderdome and knows what to fix. The fact that the movie will be R shows already that he's not making Beyond Thunderdome 2.
Uh dude, I'm excited for the film too but lets not twist any facts. Fury Road will be PG-13, disappointingly.
5357
« on: March 24, 2015, 01:35:44 PM »
Good thing I don't watch the TV show
How does it feel to know that showfags will now be spoiling plot points to bookfags? P O T T E R Y O T T E R Y
5358
« on: March 24, 2015, 11:53:53 AM »
A GTA game that deviates away from the "distorted vision of the American dream" parables would be a decent change for once. It's getting a bit stale at this point.
I'd really like to see a GTA game that echoes the themes of Killing Them Softly. A Detroit esque city amidst the backdrop of the 08 recession where the protagonist you play as just wants to survive by any means necessary, whilst keeping in touch with the satirical and humorous quirkiness that the previous GTA had to keep it from getting too grimdark.
5359
« on: March 24, 2015, 10:59:15 AM »
FUCCCCCCCCK MAN
One of the main reasons I liked the show was because it remained fairly true to the books. Does that mean they'll branch off into their own separate path? I know Grrm said he has told the writers the key points ahead of the current books but man
David Benioff and D.B. Weiss stated that they're essentially going to follow the story arc of what Martin intended with a few deviations here and there (I think cutting out Euron, Victarion and Aegon isn't exactly a minor deviation but oh well). The books are basically going to become a novelization of the show with a few added details basically.
5360
« on: March 24, 2015, 10:56:21 AM »
I think MM has the potential to do well. It has the original director at the helm and everything we've seen so far looks like what a Mad Max reboot should be like.
We still need some more media attention for Episode VII, so it really could go either way. I do feel like Abrams has a lot more pressure to succeed though. It's unfair, but it's true. At least the prequels were memorably bad. If Abrams makes a serviceable, but not exactly exemplary SW film then it'll be remembered just for that. The first ever mediocre Star Wars film. He really needs to get everything bang on the money here.
5361
« on: March 24, 2015, 10:45:20 AM »
I don't get it.
The tv show will now overtake the books since they've yet to be finished because Gurrm is a fucking fat loser.
5362
« on: March 24, 2015, 10:43:03 AM »
 http://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2015/03/game-of-thrones-tv-show-will-spoil-booksF A T F U C K I N G H A C K A T F U C K I N G H A C K >Victarion and Euron aren't in the story >Dany is flawless >Jon is flawless >Lady Stone who? >Brienne BTFOing anything that moves because big stronk independent womyn >Sand Snakes being feminists >No Quentyn >No Jon Connington >No Wyman Manderly speech See ya Aegon. We hardly knew ya.
5363
« on: March 24, 2015, 08:19:27 AM »
5364
« on: March 24, 2015, 08:12:11 AM »
I know this is pretty tragic but...Spoiler the memes are spilling into reality.
5365
« on: March 24, 2015, 07:50:42 AM »
  HAVE WE STARTED THE FIRE?
5366
« on: March 24, 2015, 07:44:09 AM »
5367
« on: March 24, 2015, 07:23:12 AM »
This is some Russian tier corruption right here.
5368
« on: March 23, 2015, 08:38:15 PM »
sangheili posters pls get out my thread
5369
« on: March 23, 2015, 08:37:00 PM »
ayy lmao
5370
« on: March 23, 2015, 08:34:25 PM »
and women are always oppressed
just be a man
boom
Pages: 1 ... 177178179 180181 ... 243
|
Show Posts
