Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Mordo

Pages: 1 ... 114115116 117118 ... 243
3451
Gaming / Re: Fallout 4 is not a Fallout game
« on: October 04, 2015, 02:14:53 PM »
and you started fallout on F3 so stop acting like you were this uber dedicated Fallout fan from the beginning you elitist fuck

3452
Gaming / Re: Fallout 4 is not a Fallout game
« on: October 04, 2015, 02:04:07 PM »
can we please drop the skills meme because I'm sick of hearing it

the problem with skyrims perks was that they barely impacted the game. there's nothing intrinsically wrong with having a perk system. it's how you implement it properly, namely, TW3.

but please tell us more of your magical insight into a 15 minute demo like the /v/eddit drone that you are.

3453
Serious / Re: It's not about mental health, it's about armed whities
« on: October 04, 2015, 01:48:31 PM »
slavery should be reintroduced tbfh

3454
The Flood / Re: REMINDER THAT ANGLOS ARE SUBHUMAN
« on: October 04, 2015, 01:13:57 PM »

olivenigger laying hard truths on burgerland

3455
The Flood / Re: REMINDER THAT ANGLOS ARE SUBHUMAN
« on: October 04, 2015, 01:12:06 PM »
>Be American.
>Wake up.
>Clap at lights to turn on.
>Clap at alarm to turn off.
>Look at phone. Message from aunt.
>"It's ok, we landed. We clapped at the pilot."
>Clap in relief.
>Take massive dump in toilet.
>Clap as toilet suceeds in removing monstrous blockage.
>Open fridge. Hope there's milk.
>Clap voraciously at milk's presence.
>Turn on Tele-clap.
>Trump speech.
>God bless Ameri-CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP CLAP.

3456
The Flood / Re: RIP Camnator
« on: October 04, 2015, 12:55:25 PM »
Camnator was the most redpilled user on sep7

3457
The Flood / Re: Pretty =/= Good Sex
« on: October 04, 2015, 12:31:28 PM »
Stop making threads

I will continue until the tears flow from the pain of your ruptured anuses. The pretty red bloom of your prolapsed colons will be the light I strive for in my darkest hours.

That and I know your uncle face rapes you every time I make a new thread
haha well played good gentlesir, you get an upboat for winning the internet :^)

3458
The Flood / Re: Pretty =/= Good Sex
« on: October 04, 2015, 12:19:02 PM »
this shitpost was brought to you by reddit

3459
Serious / Re: It's not about mental health, it's about armed whities
« on: October 04, 2015, 12:12:08 PM »
lel, Arthur Chu's opinion is about as relevant as a stormfag's. If I wanted to hear the ramblings of a delusional sexist I'd read the Guardian.

3460
Serious / Re: It's not about mental health, it's about armed whities
« on: October 04, 2015, 12:00:41 PM »
>geek feminism wiki

step up your pepe game faggot. that pepe's value is months old.

3461
The Flood / i have the objectively better pepe avatar challenger
« on: October 04, 2015, 09:23:16 AM »
WE WASHED OURSELVES IN NORMIES BLOOD AND ALL THE CHADS TOO

3462
Serious / Re: Simple Question Sunday: Does might make right?
« on: October 04, 2015, 09:11:42 AM »
I suppose it depends on why the use of force is being applied.

If it's for land grabs and just general greediness then no, but I think the developed world has evolved past that point, for the most part anyway.

If it's for deposing malicious governments and dictators, then yeah, I think it's our moral obligation as developed nations to utilize the use of force in that situation.

3463
The Flood / Re: I like Verbatim
« on: October 03, 2015, 10:25:07 PM »

3464
The Flood / I like Verbatim
« on: October 03, 2015, 10:22:50 PM »
He's alright

for an anti natalist scum

3465
The Flood / Re: Mad Max was okay
« on: October 03, 2015, 03:38:49 PM »
"Boring" is probably the last word I'd use to describe it.
Mediocre?

3466
Serious / Re: About the shooting: one of my Army buddies posted this
« on: October 03, 2015, 03:09:42 PM »
Deterrence, though, would logically work.
Not really. It fails to factor in other nuances.

The vast majority of people don't have military grade training, and not everyone can handle stressful combat situations competently. This deterrence meme, as always, starts with the presupposition that absolutely nothing can go wrong when shit hits the fan because having a gun automatically makes you the T-800 capable of landing military precision shots.
you're confusing deterrence with defense.

Deterrence works like this.

I have a gun.
You have a gun too.

Because we are both capable of inflicting tremendous damage on each other, it is in neither of our interests to act aggressively.
Again, this is such an infantile lens to look through.

What guns are we talking about? What kind of people we talking about? Psychopaths tend to not really care about inflicting tremendous damage to others and/or themselves. Is this in a public area or an small restaurant/shop? What about those who aren't interested in guns? They just supposed to deal with a bunch of assholes swinging AKs around on a street corner?

See, it's half assed cop out answers like this is why I find the "deterrence" argument so fucking facile.

3467
Serious / Re: How do you feel about this quote?
« on: October 03, 2015, 07:04:35 AM »

M O R A L I T Y
O
R
A
L
I
T
Y

3468
Serious / Re: About the shooting: one of my Army buddies posted this
« on: October 03, 2015, 06:59:24 AM »
Deterrence, though, would logically work.
Not really. It fails to factor in other nuances.

The vast majority of people don't have military grade training, and not everyone can handle stressful combat situations competently. This deterrence meme, as always, starts with the presupposition that absolutely nothing can go wrong when shit hits the fan because having a gun automatically makes you the T-800 capable of landing military precision shots.

3469
Serious / Re: About the shooting: one of my Army buddies posted this
« on: October 02, 2015, 07:04:47 PM »
Gun control is a cotton bandage on a sucking chest wound. It's a lazy feel good solution to the dark realities of human nature that we refuse to face.

Can say the same of pretty much every popular leftist stance, really.
All I got from this is

"Humans love to murder, so let's provide them the tools to murder

Fuck liberals".
Humans love to use violence against those who cannot inflict the same level of violence, so let's provide them the tools to equalize their capacity to harm.

Before guns, power dynamics were based entirely on physical strength and numbers. The strong dominated the weak with swords, spears, knives.

After simple, primitive guns, power dynamics were based on numbers alone. One of you can now do as much damage as one of anyone else.

With modern autoloading weapons, all of the old is out the window. I can fight off one attacker or five with even a semi-automatic rifle.
You would love a real life lord of the flies
the point is deterrence
'Deterrence' demonstrably isn't working though.

I don't necessarily agree with stricter regulations but this "more guns make people safer" meme has been put to bed innumerable times.
There really aren't that many people carrying. If you walk into a building most places, especially places like campuses that do not allow carry or have a culture that minimizes it, you can expect to be the only armed person until the police arrive.

Deterrence, like the free market and many other wonderful things, is not working because it is not being allowed to work.

Meanwhile there are a myriad of cases of -successful- defensive gun use every fucking year. A gun works as a defensive tool. The problem is, yes, that there aren't enough people carrying them.
Got any empirical data from the most liberalized states in regards to gun accessibility?

I mean, half of what you're saying is literally just blind assumption.
you should know by now there is no unbiased source for gun data. EVERYONE has an agenda. Those that don't have a side don't say anything about it.

Even in pro-gun states, carriers represent a small minority. I'm pretty sure they even represent a minority of gun owners in most places. This is the problem- there aren't enough of them for deterrence to actually be a thing.
Alright, simmer down with the conspiracy meme.

I'm simply asking for an academic source that proves your assertions. If open carry and deregulation really does hinder gun crime then it really shouldn't pose as a problem for you to provide evidence for it.

3470
Serious / Re: About the shooting: one of my Army buddies posted this
« on: October 02, 2015, 06:49:33 PM »
Gun control is a cotton bandage on a sucking chest wound. It's a lazy feel good solution to the dark realities of human nature that we refuse to face.

Can say the same of pretty much every popular leftist stance, really.
All I got from this is

"Humans love to murder, so let's provide them the tools to murder

Fuck liberals".
Humans love to use violence against those who cannot inflict the same level of violence, so let's provide them the tools to equalize their capacity to harm.

Before guns, power dynamics were based entirely on physical strength and numbers. The strong dominated the weak with swords, spears, knives.

After simple, primitive guns, power dynamics were based on numbers alone. One of you can now do as much damage as one of anyone else.

With modern autoloading weapons, all of the old is out the window. I can fight off one attacker or five with even a semi-automatic rifle.
You would love a real life lord of the flies
the point is deterrence
'Deterrence' demonstrably isn't working though.

I don't necessarily agree with stricter regulations but this "more guns make people safer" meme has been put to bed innumerable times.
There really aren't that many people carrying. If you walk into a building most places, especially places like campuses that do not allow carry or have a culture that minimizes it, you can expect to be the only armed person until the police arrive.

Deterrence, like the free market and many other wonderful things, is not working because it is not being allowed to work.

Meanwhile there are a myriad of cases of -successful- defensive gun use every fucking year. A gun works as a defensive tool. The problem is, yes, that there aren't enough people carrying them.
Got any empirical data from the most liberalized states in regards to gun accessibility?

I mean, half of what you're saying is literally just blind assumption.

3471
Serious / Re: About the shooting: one of my Army buddies posted this
« on: October 02, 2015, 03:11:54 PM »
Gun control is a cotton bandage on a sucking chest wound. It's a lazy feel good solution to the dark realities of human nature that we refuse to face.

Can say the same of pretty much every popular leftist stance, really.
All I got from this is

"Humans love to murder, so let's provide them the tools to murder

Fuck liberals".
Humans love to use violence against those who cannot inflict the same level of violence, so let's provide them the tools to equalize their capacity to harm.

Before guns, power dynamics were based entirely on physical strength and numbers. The strong dominated the weak with swords, spears, knives.

After simple, primitive guns, power dynamics were based on numbers alone. One of you can now do as much damage as one of anyone else.

With modern autoloading weapons, all of the old is out the window. I can fight off one attacker or five with even a semi-automatic rifle.
You would love a real life lord of the flies
the point is deterrence
'Deterrence' demonstrably isn't working though.

I don't necessarily agree with stricter regulations but this "more guns make people safer" meme has been put to bed innumerable times.

3472
The Flood / Re: If a condom is used, what is wrong with incest?
« on: October 02, 2015, 01:08:24 PM »
Nothing, really. The only argument against it is "it's icky."

Even if you're not using protection the chances of a birth defect are relatively low despite the popular belief. It only poses a hazard if it starts becoming a generational thing.

3473
Serious / Re: Oregon Umpqua Community College Shooting
« on: October 02, 2015, 09:42:27 AM »
I feel like it would really aid to the discourse if people stopped conflating gun bans with gun control.

Not necessarily saying I agree with tighter regulations but the pro gun camp really need to stop misrepresenting arguments.

3474
Serious / Re: Oregon Umpqua Community College Shooting
« on: October 01, 2015, 06:39:42 PM »

GET OUT
GET OUT
GET OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUTTTTTTTTT TTTTTTTTTT
Somehow I don't think you'd be posting memes if this was your family.

Keep your shitposting out of the Serious board.
fuck off normie

3475
The Flood / Re: The beta uprising has begun
« on: October 01, 2015, 04:09:18 PM »
MODS

GET OUT

GET OOOOUUUUUUTTTTT

3476
Serious / Re: Oregon Umpqua Community College Shooting
« on: October 01, 2015, 03:49:31 PM »
Thank god the shooter is dead. Fucking bitchmade pussy.
No confirmation of death yet. He's been detained.

Sheriff just confirmed it
NEETS WILL NEVER DIE

3477
Serious / Re: Oregon Umpqua Community College Shooting
« on: October 01, 2015, 03:43:51 PM »
Thank god the shooter is dead. Fucking bitchmade pussy.
No confirmation of death yet. He's been detained.

3478
The Flood / Re: The beta uprising has begun
« on: October 01, 2015, 03:36:39 PM »
>this is the serious forum
It's serious because 4chan is going to get buttfucked by the FBI and then I'll have nowhere to shitpost but here.

3479
The Flood / Re: The beta uprising has begun
« on: October 01, 2015, 03:31:30 PM »
Okay I actually read the article. Holy shit lol is this really the average normie's perception of 4chan?

they need cleansed

3480
Serious / Re: Oregon Umpqua Community College Shooting
« on: October 01, 2015, 03:20:52 PM »
Dammit Mordo this is the srs board!
I ALREADY HAVE A THREAD ON THIS YOU FUCKING NORMIE

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Pages: 1 ... 114115116 117118 ... 243