This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Zizzy
2671
« on: August 05, 2014, 12:08:50 PM »
Then everyone would have the same accent.
2672
« on: August 05, 2014, 11:48:48 AM »
P-P-P-Posting Riot!!!
Go for the postocalypse.
2673
« on: August 04, 2014, 12:00:52 PM »
Your avatar is huuuuuuuge
2674
« on: August 03, 2014, 09:41:35 PM »
Could be the best/worst year of my life depending on my results in 2 weeks. It's certainly been the most stressful.
2675
« on: August 03, 2014, 06:24:31 AM »
Sigh...
2676
« on: August 02, 2014, 08:21:08 PM »
"LOOKS LIKE MEAT'S BACK ON THE MENU BOYS!"
Really deep.
2677
« on: August 01, 2014, 03:39:01 PM »
Bayern Munchen
Got nothing on muh Leafs!
TBlocks pls
We got Robben, Ribery, Lahm, Neuer, and most of the German national team.
And Lewandowski!
2678
« on: August 01, 2014, 12:39:36 PM »
 lol
2679
« on: July 31, 2014, 08:43:47 PM »
Get a ferry over to Ireland, it'll be worth it.
2680
« on: July 31, 2014, 06:33:36 PM »
No, but what is the little symbol on the side of this thread?
2681
« on: July 31, 2014, 05:42:30 PM »
2682
« on: July 31, 2014, 03:02:31 PM »
how would you go and check that? because I honestly don't remember. I might have been a Legendary member.
http://halo.bungie.net/
2683
« on: July 31, 2014, 02:57:27 PM »
I think honorable was a year without bans.
I was Noble Legendary.
2684
« on: July 31, 2014, 11:04:50 AM »
Maybe it should be called "Offtopic thread" to discourage spam for the sake of spam. Just a suggestion.
2685
« on: July 30, 2014, 09:05:53 PM »
Hey, that's contrapment!!
2686
« on: July 30, 2014, 08:17:12 PM »
I don't think he will show up, considering how people keep calling him a "pedo". Seriously, that jokes old, it stopped being funny months ago.
Exactly
2687
« on: July 30, 2014, 08:15:24 PM »
G'night
2688
« on: July 30, 2014, 08:07:10 PM »
Man United 4 lief
2689
« on: July 30, 2014, 05:55:31 PM »
I'll volunteer, because why not?
Many reasons. Not that I have anything against you whatsoever, but I don't think you've thought it through fully if that's your reason for volunteering.
2690
« on: July 30, 2014, 04:53:27 PM »
I went off and starting doin' some writing. Then last night I realized that I only had a few hours left until my account was given das boot Given the boat? 
2691
« on: July 30, 2014, 04:51:37 PM »
18, 19 on March 19.
2692
« on: July 30, 2014, 04:46:50 PM »
BE, as always.
2693
« on: July 30, 2014, 12:51:04 PM »
I would probably be Kinder so I could kill myself.
Enough of your bullshit, I thought you were warned to leave that stuff off this site?
Just leave it alone. This is before I sent him a warning PM. I think it scared him away for a while because he hasnt' been on here since that PM.
Most likely due to the site being down though, no?
2694
« on: July 30, 2014, 12:32:55 PM »
2695
« on: July 29, 2014, 11:42:19 AM »
I've just had mods on other boards want to eliminate certain members due to personal bias. Maybe their own bias alone or the bias of a group of specific members. In the end it always created a large amount of drama between those that didn't agree with the decision and those that did. And there was no definite rule in the CoC to look at and say, "Well here's the rule/rules that were broken. This discussion can end here, now."
Exactly. It has to be on the moderator's volition whether the person is crossing the "imaginary line", and if they're showing personal bias through their actions then they shouldn't be mods. I fully support a CoC constructed at least partially by the community. All I'm saying is that the moderators should be the ones fully in charge of enforcing it. When you put an iffy situation to the public vote, I just find it hard to see the entire board looking at the situation objectively and voting. I'd see it becoming a popularity contest every time.
2696
« on: July 29, 2014, 11:21:33 AM »
But when you allow rough housing, the supposed line is an absolute blur. You'll have instances where the majority thinks it doesn't cross the line, but the moderators do. When you allow certain degrees of something and not others, it's kinda hard to be consistent.
Yes, but I believe a majority consensus should win in that instance. So long as what the majority wants doesn't endanger a site from being shut down, or utterly failing then let them have it for the most part.
Majority consensus among the staff, maybe.
See I don't entirely agree with that. I like forums where it's community has some level of say on what is allowed or disallowed. I wouldn't try to enforce that believe on this board, however. This is cheat's site, of course. He can do with it as he pleases.
I can see what you mean, and I can get on board with the community being allowed to suggest rules and give their opinions on already existing ones. But for me, when it comes to deciding who stays and goes, that's what mods are for.
2697
« on: July 29, 2014, 11:15:18 AM »
Absolutely. Didn't care at all for Destiny before I played it, now I'm hyped as hell.
2698
« on: July 29, 2014, 11:01:32 AM »
But when you allow rough housing, the supposed line is an absolute blur. You'll have instances where the majority thinks it doesn't cross the line, but the moderators do. When you allow certain degrees of something and not others, it's kinda hard to be consistent.
Yes, but I believe a majority consensus should win in that instance. So long as what the majority wants doesn't endanger a site from being shut down, or utterly failing then let them have it for the most part.
Majority consensus among the staff, maybe.
2699
« on: July 29, 2014, 10:54:10 AM »
I believe mods should allow some degree of rough housing, and let there be a definite line to have to cross for a member to be banned. This seems like a tricky concept, to allow rough housing but to also have a definite line. I don't think you really can have a definite line - in my opinion it should be the mod who decides when to step in and end it. There may be a line, but it would vary from mod to mod.
If I see something I believe is crossing the line or someone tells me that someone is crossing the line I'll give that person 1 verbal warning that they've crossed the line and need to stop it. If they continue further persecutions will take place.
The question wasn't what to do should someone cross the line, it's how to define the line itself. "or someone tells me that someone is crossing the line " It's not up to them what crosses the line, it's up to you. Decide it for yourself, or discuss it with the rest of the staff.
2700
« on: July 29, 2014, 10:51:22 AM »
I believe mods should allow some degree of rough housing, and let there be a definite line to have to cross for a member to be banned. This seems like a tricky concept, to allow rough housing but to also have a definite line. I don't think you really can have a definite line - in my opinion it should be the mod who decides when to step in and end it. There may be a line, but it would vary from mod to mod.
No you can't have one absolutely. But you can have one that at lest a majority can look at and say, "yep, that nigga crossed the line right there."
But when you allow rough housing, the supposed line is an absolute blur. You'll have instances where the majority thinks it doesn't cross the line, but the moderators do. When you allow certain degrees of something and not others, it's kinda hard to be consistent.
|
Show Posts
