This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Magos Domina
Pages: 1 ... 101112 1314 ... 220
331
« on: May 17, 2015, 05:40:52 AM »
Eh it doesn't look great but I'll probs still watch it
Looks leagues better than dragon ball evolution and the last airbender...
332
« on: May 17, 2015, 04:16:57 AM »
My cock :^3
This guy? 
333
« on: May 17, 2015, 03:47:42 AM »
Interesting. So who's Humongous?
334
« on: May 17, 2015, 03:04:30 AM »
I wouldn't want to be a mod again.
335
« on: May 17, 2015, 03:03:28 AM »
why is this in gaymen?
Fuck, thought I posted this in the flood.
336
« on: May 17, 2015, 03:01:19 AM »
Okay sucks that they aren't mostly all white like in the anime but from the trailer it looks surprisingly good. Probably better than anything Hollywood would make...
337
« on: May 17, 2015, 02:27:02 AM »
Now that's annoying. Throwing in villains Spider-man 3 style is not going to help, they already have Lex Luthor in it.
Lex is more of an anti hero in a lot of continuities and having 2 villains isn't exactly gonna saturate the movie.
But they already have like a million heroes. We only need 2 heroes and 1 villain.
it is the setup for the birth of their Justice League, you know
Annnnnnnnnnnnnd? They're seriously going to do the whole "oh we're all friends!" thing at the start of JL? Hahahaha. Yeah sorry but there's a reason The Avengers worked. Even if you didn't see the rest of the MCU you could watch the Avengers and know that it was about a team coming together to stop a bad guy with a magic mcguffin. DC are desperately playing catchup and them cramming as much into Bats V Sups as possible is just stupid.
Bats V Sups should just be about Batman and Superman starting out as enemies then teaming up when the big bad guy starts being a big bad guy, they don't need half the Justice League showing up.
the avengers worked because it was a $$$$-driven popcorn machine, not because it had a solid narrative.
I smell a DC fanboy. Sorry but with the plans WB has for the DCCU.... It's gonna suck. The decisions that have been made so far are mostly terrible to confusing while the only real fan rage in the MCU was Iron Man 3's Mandarin. And it's not that the DCCU is going to be dark and gritty, Dredd was dark and gritty but it was awesome, MoS and from the looks of it Bats V Sups and Suicide Squad are going to be dull, grey and take themselves waaaaaay too seriously.
DC media is at its best when its gritty. See: Frank Miller's The Dark Knight Returns, Teen Titans, The Dark Knight, Justice League: Crisis on Two Earths, Assault on Arkham.
Marvel excels at being irreverent eye candy. DC excels at being meaningful.
Again, lol fanboy. Crisis on Two Earths is gritty? Assault on Arkham gritty? Teen Titans Gritty? Fuck not even the Dark Knight is gritty.
338
« on: May 17, 2015, 01:00:30 AM »
Now that's annoying. Throwing in villains Spider-man 3 style is not going to help, they already have Lex Luthor in it.
Lex is more of an anti hero in a lot of continuities and having 2 villains isn't exactly gonna saturate the movie.
But they already have like a million heroes. We only need 2 heroes and 1 villain.
it is the setup for the birth of their Justice League, you know
Annnnnnnnnnnnnd? They're seriously going to do the whole "oh we're all friends!" thing at the start of JL? Hahahaha. Yeah sorry but there's a reason The Avengers worked. Even if you didn't see the rest of the MCU you could watch the Avengers and know that it was about a team coming together to stop a bad guy with a magic mcguffin. DC are desperately playing catchup and them cramming as much into Bats V Sups as possible is just stupid.
Bats V Sups should just be about Batman and Superman starting out as enemies then teaming up when the big bad guy starts being a big bad guy, they don't need half the Justice League showing up.
the avengers worked because it was a $$$$-driven popcorn machine, not because it had a solid narrative.
That's essentially Man of Steel in a nutshell.
MoS didnt have nearly the amount of $$$-hype behind it and it actually had a meaningful conflict. it had a lot of flaws but i think its fundamentally a much better movie.
MoS a better movie?...... LMAO
339
« on: May 17, 2015, 12:59:07 AM »
Now that's annoying. Throwing in villains Spider-man 3 style is not going to help, they already have Lex Luthor in it.
Lex is more of an anti hero in a lot of continuities and having 2 villains isn't exactly gonna saturate the movie.
But they already have like a million heroes. We only need 2 heroes and 1 villain.
it is the setup for the birth of their Justice League, you know
Annnnnnnnnnnnnd? They're seriously going to do the whole "oh we're all friends!" thing at the start of JL? Hahahaha. Yeah sorry but there's a reason The Avengers worked. Even if you didn't see the rest of the MCU you could watch the Avengers and know that it was about a team coming together to stop a bad guy with a magic mcguffin. DC are desperately playing catchup and them cramming as much into Bats V Sups as possible is just stupid.
Bats V Sups should just be about Batman and Superman starting out as enemies then teaming up when the big bad guy starts being a big bad guy, they don't need half the Justice League showing up.
the avengers worked because it was a $$$$-driven popcorn machine, not because it had a solid narrative.
I smell a DC fanboy. Sorry but with the plans WB has for the DCCU.... It's gonna suck. The decisions that have been made so far are mostly terrible to confusing while the only real fan rage in the MCU was Iron Man 3's Mandarin. And it's not that the DCCU is going to be dark and gritty, Dredd was dark and gritty but it was awesome, MoS and from the looks of it Bats V Sups and Suicide Squad are going to be dull, grey and take themselves waaaaaay too seriously.
340
« on: May 17, 2015, 12:41:53 AM »
Now that's annoying. Throwing in villains Spider-man 3 style is not going to help, they already have Lex Luthor in it.
Lex is more of an anti hero in a lot of continuities and having 2 villains isn't exactly gonna saturate the movie.
But they already have like a million heroes. We only need 2 heroes and 1 villain.
it is the setup for the birth of their Justice League, you know
Annnnnnnnnnnnnd? They're seriously going to do the whole "oh we're all friends!" thing at the start of JL? Hahahaha. Yeah sorry but there's a reason The Avengers worked. Even if you didn't see the rest of the MCU you could watch the Avengers and know that it was about a team coming together to stop a bad guy with a magic mcguffin. DC are desperately playing catchup and them cramming as much into Bats V Sups as possible is just stupid. Bats V Sups should just be about Batman and Superman starting out as enemies then teaming up when the big bad guy starts being a big bad guy, they don't need half the Justice League showing up.
341
« on: May 16, 2015, 11:59:16 PM »
Now that's annoying. Throwing in villains Spider-man 3 style is not going to help, they already have Lex Luthor in it.
Lex is more of an anti hero in a lot of continuities and having 2 villains isn't exactly gonna saturate the movie.
But they already have like a million heroes. We only need 2 heroes and 1 villain.
342
« on: May 16, 2015, 11:57:46 PM »
You understand how dogs kill things right? You might as well tell me a crocodile is a pleasant way to go.
But spinning round and round in the dishwasher and getting dizzy while drowning while simultaneously mangling all extremeties if fun!
They should make a kids ride out of it. Or a rollar coaster.
Call it "Ride the Nile."
On the bright side, if a croc bites your arm, bye bye arm. If a pack of dogs bite your arm, prepare to dance!
Now there's a species of animals who should be converted into food. Same with hippos.
How about no?
343
« on: May 16, 2015, 08:03:26 PM »
You understand how dogs kill things right? You might as well tell me a crocodile is a pleasant way to go.
But spinning round and round in the dishwasher and getting dizzy while drowning while simultaneously mangling all extremeties if fun!
They should make a kids ride out of it. Or a rollar coaster.
Call it "Ride the Nile."
On the bright side, if a croc bites your arm, bye bye arm. If a pack of dogs bite your arm, prepare to dance!
344
« on: May 16, 2015, 07:12:43 PM »
Nothing. There's nothing wrong with GMOs.
345
« on: May 16, 2015, 06:39:36 PM »
Is this Sep7s one or dramageddons one?
The latter.
Well fuck that
346
« on: May 16, 2015, 06:37:34 PM »
Is this Sep7s one or dramageddons one?
347
« on: May 16, 2015, 06:36:09 PM »
Yeah why do people get worked up on what a "critic" gives a movie or game? Did YOU like the movie? Yes? Then that's all that fucking matters. As for Dredd, it's one of the greatest comic book movies ever, it certainly beets Nolans Batman and that depressos Watchmen. But hey don't get all butthurt it's just an opinion after all.
348
« on: May 16, 2015, 05:28:11 PM »
Depends on the context. I think that it should be legal if you have a permit, and that permit would be issued exclusively to people who have to deal with fox problems.
Making it illegal outright isn't fair for the farmers who would have their farms ravaged by foxes.
Fox hunting isn't just grabbing your shotgun and shooting a threat to your livestock. Fox hunting is a barbaric act of rich bastards riding through the countryside with hundreds of dogs to trap any fox they see and tear it apart while it's still alive. It's bad enough the fucking "sport" is legal all over Ireland, we don't need the bad lifted in mainland UK. It's not the fucking middle ages anymore.
I said that it would be only allowed for people whose livelihoods are under threat by foxes.
and people whos livestock are "at risk" still have the rights to kill that threat. Going into a remote area and having foxes ripped apart by packs of dogs has nothing to do with protecting livestock.
Well, then there's no debate. I never said that the general populace should be allowed to hunt foxes.
The debate that the conservatives use is "something something culture and heritage something something". The majority of people in the country are strongly opposed to it.
349
« on: May 16, 2015, 05:26:16 PM »
These things never really go anywhere.
350
« on: May 16, 2015, 05:23:49 PM »
Depends on the context. I think that it should be legal if you have a permit, and that permit would be issued exclusively to people who have to deal with fox problems.
Making it illegal outright isn't fair for the farmers who would have their farms ravaged by foxes.
Fox hunting isn't just grabbing your shotgun and shooting a threat to your livestock. Fox hunting is a barbaric act of rich bastards riding through the countryside with hundreds of dogs to trap any fox they see and tear it apart while it's still alive. It's bad enough the fucking "sport" is legal all over Ireland, we don't need the bad lifted in mainland UK. It's not the fucking middle ages anymore.
I said that it would be only allowed for people whose livelihoods are under threat by foxes.
and people whos livestock are "at risk" still have the rights to kill that threat. Going into a remote area and having foxes ripped apart by packs of dogs has nothing to do with protecting livestock.
351
« on: May 16, 2015, 05:20:50 PM »
Depends on the context. I think that it should be legal if you have a permit, and that permit would be issued exclusively to people who have to deal with fox problems.
Making it illegal outright isn't fair for the farmers who would have their farms ravaged by foxes.
Fox hunting isn't just grabbing your shotgun and shooting a threat to your livestock. Fox hunting is a barbaric act of rich bastards riding through the countryside with hundreds of dogs to trap any fox they see and tear it apart while it's still alive. It's bad enough the fucking "sport" is legal all over Ireland, we don't need the bad lifted in mainland UK. It's not the fucking middle ages anymore.
352
« on: May 16, 2015, 04:58:37 PM »
I agree with an NPR commentator that said, "if he doesn't deserve the death penalty, then no-one does."
You're right, no one deserves the death penalty. Not even if they're the next Stalin.
I'm not sure if you're purposefully misrepresenting my position, but I support the verdict.
I know you do, and it shows your character.
353
« on: May 16, 2015, 04:35:28 PM »
I agree with an NPR commentator that said, "if he doesn't deserve the death penalty, then no-one does."
You're right, no one deserves the death penalty. Not even if they're the next Stalin.
354
« on: May 16, 2015, 02:35:40 PM »
I heard good things.
355
« on: May 16, 2015, 02:32:19 PM »
the gun looks really close to the center of the screen and that bothers me.
The very 21st century reticle bothers me more.
356
« on: May 16, 2015, 01:47:54 PM »
hue
357
« on: May 16, 2015, 01:46:52 PM »
A best friend.
358
« on: May 16, 2015, 01:40:04 PM »
When I was joining the RAF
359
« on: May 16, 2015, 01:07:06 PM »
And no Meta it's not a quick kill.
Like I say, if that's the case then it should absolutely remain illegal.
I could post footage but I'd rather not. When the dogs get a fox or a deer they tear it apart. It's not like on safari were a lioness quickly goes for the throat, the dogs tear away at the animal then the hunter cuts the foxes tail off and "bloods" him/herself.
360
« on: May 16, 2015, 12:46:25 PM »
small dicks and sore asses.
Pages: 1 ... 101112 1314 ... 220
|
Show Posts