This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Casper
Pages: 1 ... 495051 5253 ... 339
1501
« on: January 31, 2017, 06:25:17 PM »
I don't like Hermione as Belle
1502
« on: January 29, 2017, 02:55:47 AM »
2 hours and no answer, rip
Women are very needy creatures, she was likely just using you for conversation.
Huh, this makes a lot of sense
1503
« on: January 29, 2017, 02:54:10 AM »
A private material owned by another individual can not be an action.
Get rekt authoritarian, soon all the roads in the country will be toll roads!
Property is theft. Just build your own roads
1504
« on: January 28, 2017, 05:01:35 PM »
ew what
1505
« on: January 28, 2017, 10:58:17 AM »
My guess is because we're taught in school how Nazis were the most evil people ever and that they were far right extremists (even though Hitler said himself they were socialists), so crying fascist evokes the idea of Nazis, but we're never taught of the atrocities and failing of communism other than the Berlin Wall fell in the '89. Our school system is generally so filled with left-side thinking and ideologies, that they try to wipe away all the times they've failed in history. It's similar to how people hear the word 'conservative' and shudder.
1506
« on: January 27, 2017, 11:45:19 PM »
Who?
1507
« on: January 26, 2017, 09:23:34 PM »
And people called Alex Jones crazy
1508
« on: January 26, 2017, 03:03:09 PM »
Same can be said about men and women's intelligence bell curve.
1509
« on: January 26, 2017, 02:42:00 PM »
I honestly don't care how it gets paid for. I never thought Mexico would literally pay for it, more that they would be losing our support from either the government or immigrants sending it back. Seems to me like a "take an inconvenience now to lessen later troubles" deal.
1510
« on: January 26, 2017, 02:13:15 PM »
Put up counter posters of the evil of Islam, like graphic executions and acid burns
1511
« on: January 25, 2017, 06:30:04 PM »
Those were simpler times
1512
« on: January 25, 2017, 06:28:38 PM »
0 cuz I have no way too
1515
« on: January 23, 2017, 05:25:28 PM »
The best part about people bitching about Trump is that he's still president
1516
« on: January 23, 2017, 12:49:01 PM »
O no, the president is doing things I approve of, don't care about, or are inconsequential to me. He must be illegitimate.
Somehow I get the feeling you're just going to brown nose this guy no matter what he does.
Depends on what he ends up doing.
1517
« on: January 23, 2017, 12:05:18 PM »
Who cares? It's still funny.
>Sargon of Akkad No I like him too lol
1518
« on: January 23, 2017, 11:59:55 AM »
>Sargon of Akkad
1519
« on: January 23, 2017, 11:58:47 AM »
O no, the president is doing things I approve of, don't care about, or are inconsequential to me. He must be illegitimate.
1520
« on: January 22, 2017, 05:24:50 PM »
1521
« on: January 22, 2017, 12:29:37 PM »
"my guy had more people at his party than YOUR guy did!!!2"
So this is what the debate has come to.
To be fair, Trump started it as far as I know.
1522
« on: January 22, 2017, 11:51:17 AM »
I just checked your image. The number one thing that immediately stood out was the left and right sides of the main crowd where the streets start. Trees blocking people in Obama's image were cut down in Trump's but you can clearly see the open road on the left side of Trump's over Obama's.
I'll have you know though that I really don't care about the Inauguration photos, the only thing I'm busting my balls over the Inauguration is finding the video of The American Tap Company performance at the Inaugural Ball.
You people are unbelievable. Believe what you want them, it seems to be the only thing the left is capable of. It's a gigapixel nearly 360 degree shot of the inauguration and you can zoom in in full clarity to the back. You can see that the people nearly reach the tent or at least the edge of the white tarp in front of the tent, which is more people than the aerial shows. I'm still not trying to say there were more people that at Obama's, but there were more people there than what the aerial picture shows that everyone's rubbing their cock over because "Trump is a failing president". I really don't care about the crowd sizes either, but jesus christ trying to find a middle ground understandin with these people is impossible. Both sides are trying to exaggerate the number of people there or not.
1523
« on: January 22, 2017, 11:39:57 AM »
So please explain the perspective distortion in the gigapixel image
http://www.cnn.com/interactive/2017/01/politics/trump-inauguration-gigapixel/
1 - You can literally see plenty of white space in front of the media tent (The large, white tent at the far right of the picture), along with two sections back from the reflecting pond. There is also standing area behind the media tent (Between it and the Washington monument) that would show the speech on monitors - assuming that areas in front of the tent are open as the image shows, the area behind the tent would fail to meet capacity as well.
2 - You're still attempting to argue that a level shot from the stands will show better estimates of the crowds than an aerial shot from above. It really doesn't, as any reputable photography or cinematographer would argue.
You people are unbelievable. Believe what you want them, it seems to be the only thing the left is capable of. It's a gigapixel nearly 360 degree shot of the inauguration and you can zoom in in full clarity to the back. You can see that the people nearly reach the tent or at least the edge of the white tarp in front of the tent, which is more people than the aerial shows. I'm still not trying to say there were more people that at Obama's, but there were more people there than what the aerial picture shows that everyone's rubbing their cock over because "Trump is a failing president".
1524
« on: January 22, 2017, 11:17:20 AM »
1525
« on: January 22, 2017, 02:35:39 AM »
Came across this
you see there's a problem with the claim on that image you posted, that comparison shot was taken during the speech at peak time for the crowd
you've fallen for damage control son
I was just showing that there was another image showing more people. Unfortunately I couldn't attend, so I can't say which is certain either way.
that's not how it works
changing the perspective to make it look like Obama and Trump had roughly the same amount of people doesn't mean that they had the same amount of people
the overhead shot has more people in the frame than the on the ground one, it's also providing you the complete picture instead of a cherry picked angle that tries to fool you into believing a false narrative
Are you seriously trying to say the Trump picture is just a perspective trick when it's quite literally the same viewing angle?
I was just showing that there was another image showing more people.
you literally said that changing the perspective creates more people
there are not more people in that picture than there are in the overhead shot of the trump inaguration
I didn't say changing the perspective adds more people. I was pointing out that there's another image showing that there are more people present than the skimpy leads on. I can't say one way or the other if Trump had more or less people because there are conflicting images, but it's known that most media tries to downplay the number or Trumps supporters as seen last year from his rallies.
1526
« on: January 22, 2017, 02:26:23 AM »
Came across this
you see there's a problem with the claim on that image you posted, that comparison shot was taken during the speech at peak time for the crowd
you've fallen for damage control son
I was just showing that there was another image showing more people. Unfortunately I couldn't attend, so I can't say which is certain either way.
that's not how it works
changing the perspective to make it look like Obama and Trump had roughly the same amount of people doesn't mean that they had the same amount of people
the overhead shot has more people in the frame than the on the ground one, it's also providing you the complete picture instead of a cherry picked angle that tries to fool you into believing a false narrative
Are you seriously trying to say the Trump picture is just a perspective trick when it's quite literally the same viewing angle?
1527
« on: January 22, 2017, 01:32:16 AM »
Came across this
you see there's a problem with the claim on that image you posted, that comparison shot was taken during the speech at peak time for the crowd
you've fallen for damage control son
I was just showing that there was another image showing more people. Unfortunately I couldn't attend, so I can't say which is certain either way.
1528
« on: January 22, 2017, 01:14:15 AM »
Came across this
1529
« on: January 22, 2017, 01:11:15 AM »
Even as an art major, to my understanding, I'm okay with this. Tax payers shouldn't have to fund the arts. They can donate if they'd like, but forcing them to pay for it is wrong. It eliminates the point of disapproval through boycotting. And besides, no one stopping PBS or whoever from broadcasting, they just need to find another way to pay for themselves.
1530
« on: January 22, 2017, 12:49:32 AM »
Sounds like a fun time
Pages: 1 ... 495051 5253 ... 339
|
Show Posts
