This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Casper
Pages: 1 ... 343536 3738 ... 339
1051
« on: August 19, 2017, 06:09:27 PM »
I do find guys attractive, I dunno why. But I never really think of myself as gay, similar to how my friend forgets that I'm not a girl
So you're saying there's a chance
A chance of what
He wants to eat your ass
Oh yeah, that's fine. Can't find anyone else who will tbh
1052
« on: August 19, 2017, 04:50:23 PM »
I do find guys attractive, I dunno why. But I never really think of myself as gay, similar to how my friend forgets that I'm not a girl
So you're saying there's a chance
A chance of what
1053
« on: August 19, 2017, 04:33:33 PM »
You find that you are exclusively attracted to people who are the same sex as you.
FTFY
still wrong
Are you going for the action vs thought position?
1054
« on: August 19, 2017, 04:31:16 PM »
I do find guys attractive, I dunno why. But I never really think of myself as gay, similar to how my friend forgets that I'm not a girl
1055
« on: August 19, 2017, 01:22:50 AM »
As long as their 18 or older, do what you want. I think they're often a mistake and don't lead to the satisfaction the tranny's looking for, but that's not my decision to make. Also the hairballs they get up inside is nasty
1056
« on: August 18, 2017, 10:41:49 PM »
>projecting
1057
« on: August 18, 2017, 06:55:35 PM »
I hate it when it's a subject I'm not entirely sure about. I don't like speaking in general unless I know what I'm talking about. My two biggest issues though are keeping my thoughts organized and making sure I don't forget something because my mind goes blank, even if I spend hours preparing. I also talk quickly which is apparently no good
1058
« on: August 18, 2017, 06:52:43 PM »
But can we take a moment to appreciate my handcrafted meme? Quite exquisite, I say
1059
« on: August 18, 2017, 06:51:32 PM »
Pluck it with tweezers. Or get an epilator, but the mustache area hurts like bitch
1060
« on: August 18, 2017, 12:14:22 AM »
huh im only about a 5 hour drive to NYC
wtf I'm only two hours and I'm south of you.
I dunno, for some reason its takes like 4 or 5 hours by bus from Williamsport. We usually take 80 and pass by Stroudsburg to get there
1061
« on: August 17, 2017, 11:55:42 PM »
huh im only about a 5 hour drive to NYC
1062
« on: August 16, 2017, 06:52:30 PM »
can I spit in your mouth?
1063
« on: August 16, 2017, 05:01:12 PM »
1064
« on: August 15, 2017, 07:52:57 PM »
Gotta keep everything mobile, being a gypsy ain't easy. Finna upgrade soon when the case I want is available 
1065
« on: August 15, 2017, 11:14:11 AM »
I'm autistic, poor, and gay with body dysmorphia, what do I win?
It will be okay, dear. But please remember that you're fucking white and a cis male. Two of the worst classes of society. Gay people can still be extremely oppressive to minorities, and as a cisgender male you are part of the patriarchy. This is a radfem website, SELF CRIT!
How am I cis?
1066
« on: August 15, 2017, 09:48:48 AM »
Just because there are somethings only females tend to do, doesn't make it culture. Painting your nails is not something that is only allowed by females, even if they are the ones doing it a majority of the time, it's not exclusionary to them. Same with makeup, clothes, and other things this thread would cover on the idea. The only thing I could possibly see "Female culture" being is shit like menstruating and being pregnant.
Is it? deny that in the "west" there are tropes that cross borders when men and women are involved. No, if you're a dude and youre painting your nails or wearin makup you're a fucking fairy.
Even if youre emo and its all black. Fucking queer ass bullshit that men don't do, bro. It's female culture.
Ey you leave emos out of this, we're pure
1067
« on: August 15, 2017, 09:46:36 AM »
I'm autistic, poor, and gay with body dysmorphia, what do I win?
1068
« on: August 15, 2017, 08:26:23 AM »
This is why I'm gay
1069
« on: August 14, 2017, 11:27:51 PM »
I dunno if this counts, but I'm p proud of it for a first try 
1070
« on: August 14, 2017, 08:54:40 AM »
Oh
1071
« on: August 14, 2017, 08:39:06 AM »
I think what he's getting at, or at least what I took from it before, is that what you define as art is so broad, that the term is essentially meaningless. It's like when everything is art, nothing is
I'm not saying that everything is art, but rather, virtually everything is capable of being perceived as art. What I'm saying constitutes art is everything that is defined as art by at least one person. If no one exists who defines any specific thing as art, then it is not art.
So then rather it's a matter of whether it's good art or not
1072
« on: August 14, 2017, 07:58:51 AM »
It's very disappointing that, again, someone is trying to stigmatize my views in that way.
Sorry, but that's just what it comes off as.
That ultimately art is defined individually, and what I may not perceive as art, someone else might. Ergo it seems true to me that virtually anything can be perceived as art so long as a single person exists to perceive it as such. That thing may only be art in the mind of a single person in existence, but one is all it takes. ... It may be a simple perspective but I don't see how it's unreasonable at all.
But see, it's not even worth defining "art" at all if it can be applied to anything.
I'm not even saying that my perspective is the "right" one (though I'm going to argue as though I think it is). But I know that your position is wrong. If you can apply a definition to anything, it's not worth having a definition. Objectivity exists.
If anything is even remotely embarrassing here, it's that you seem to be incapable of entertaining the idea I've presented and respectfully disagreeing, instead of acting stricken by it to the point that you have to say it's embarrassing.
I say it's embarassing because it's an incredible primitive perspective, not one that you'd think would come from extensive rumination. It's the artistic equivalent of nihilism.
Honestly, your perspective is perfectly reasonable to me, I just define art differently than you do.
You actually don't define art at all. That's my contention.
You keep labeling my perspective all manner of pejoratives like it will somehow invalidate it in any way. At this point I'm wondering why you're even continuing this discussion as it would seem to you no intention of trying to understand my point of view and would rather just insult it. Which, fine, you can shit on my view all you want to. As I said, you aren't going to sway me with condescension and insults when my perspective appears to me as clear and true as it can be, and your opinion of my perspective isn't that important to me.
What is the issue here, honestly? Does my view of art offend your sensibilities? Does it really bother you that much that a person could spend time reflecting on the nature of art and come to an understanding that is much more simple than yours? Don't assume that the way I define art is the result of intellectual laziness or some form of incompetence. You have no knowledge of the thought process I used to come to the understanding I have, and yet regardless of that you seem to imply that it is unintelligent in some way or lesser than your own. I think some humility would do you good.
I have absolutely defined art by my view of it. Art is everything defined as art by all those who are capable of defining it. I entertained the idea of applying my specific standards for what strikes me as art and defining it in that way, as you have done, but I realized that doing so was not appealing to me nor was it necessary. I am still perfectly capable of having those standards and defining art in a way that would encompass all perspectives. This way of viewing art has opened me up to art forms I wouldn't have recognized in the past and allowed me to appreciate them when I likely wouldn't have otherwise. It has made my experience with art more enjoyable.
Also, please try to drop the preconceived notions you have about my views and psychedelic drug use. I would never come off to you in that way if you did not have them.
I think what he's getting at, or at least what I took from it before, is that what you define as art is so broad, that the term is essentially meaningless. It's like when everything is art, nothing is
1073
« on: August 14, 2017, 07:56:23 AM »
Do people not do period sex?
1074
« on: August 13, 2017, 11:52:01 PM »
Hello wife
1075
« on: August 13, 2017, 09:52:51 PM »
This is why we need to go back to 17th century Dutch standards of art
1076
« on: August 13, 2017, 09:51:06 PM »
GOML
I had an underage girl compliment my hair in front of the boy she was with
1077
« on: August 12, 2017, 10:24:40 PM »
Something that looks nice is not art.
Something that requires creativity is not art.
TF you on about? Is the Pietà not art? The Ghent Altarpiece? The One-Way Color Tunnel? Those aren't art?
i think what he meant was that you don't NEED those things for something to be art
Not trying to sound snarky or anything, because I'm genuinely curious. but how can someone create art without being creative? I'll admit the not looking nice part is a bias of mine, but I don't think that's really worth going into. Sorry, my thoughts are all over when it comes to this topic
You need creativity to create art, but just because you use creativity does not make what you're creating art. That's my position.
So it's more than creativity alone, as in the case with cars. It needs to be creative in conjunction with meaning, if I'm understanding correctly.
You could say that, yes. Meaning and intention. Intention is integral to my definition of art.
Ah, I put creativity and ability... technical skills before meaning, mostly because I've seen too much bullshit where people use conceptual art as a crutch for their blatant lack of any artistic skill or simply as a gimmick. Like the "this is not a pipe but a drawing of a pipe." Like no shit, the audience isn't that dumb that they think your 2D render is the actual 3D object.
1078
« on: August 12, 2017, 10:19:41 PM »
Just throwing this out there so I don't come off as a snob or something, I really enjoy this discussion. I don't get to have many of these at school because of how female dominated and shallow discussions are, or I suppose because my opinions are unpopular and generally ganged up on because I prefer old standards of art pre-Duchamp and Pollock
1079
« on: August 12, 2017, 10:16:16 PM »
Something that looks nice is not art.
Something that requires creativity is not art.
TF you on about? Is the Pietà not art? The Ghent Altarpiece? The One-Way Color Tunnel? Those aren't art?
i think what he meant was that you don't NEED those things for something to be art
Not trying to sound snarky or anything, because I'm genuinely curious. but how can someone create art without being creative? I'll admit the not looking nice part is a bias of mine, but I don't think that's really worth going into. Sorry, my thoughts are all over when it comes to this topic
You need creativity to create art, but just because you use creativity does not make what you're creating art. That's my position.
So it's more than creativity alone, as in the case with cars. It needs to be creative in conjunction with meaning, if I'm understanding correctly.
1080
« on: August 12, 2017, 10:13:13 PM »
Can you kill yourself if he doesn't?
Pages: 1 ... 343536 3738 ... 339
|
Show Posts
