This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Luciana
Pages: 1 ... 535455 5657 ... 441
1621
« on: March 02, 2017, 09:14:44 PM »
Yes, it's a fantastic series.
1622
« on: March 02, 2017, 09:13:38 PM »
It's ironic. I find you guys talking about gender equality and all that, yet you're automatically putting down one entire side with preconceived, stereotypical reasons. It's literally the reason why people view feminism as negative, rather than something positive and constructive.
1623
« on: March 02, 2017, 09:12:33 PM »
Implying we're only going off our basic instincts, sure. God forbid we use our ability to reason. I'm not sure if people have that ability, let alone men.
Or women. I've met a lot of dumb asses on both sides of the isle to make me conclude that, man or woman, the world is mostly filled with idiots.
1624
« on: March 02, 2017, 09:06:32 PM »
Generally, men are more obsessed with their ego, and women care more about reality.
Note my word "generally"
Generally, I think you're full of it.
Give me evidence before making such bold claims about 3.4 billion people
You only need to know the effects of testosterone and estrogen to work it out for yourself, though.
Implying we're only going off our basic instincts, sure. God forbid we use our ability to reason. Making blanket statements is never a good way to state a claim, especially without evidence to back it up. I figured you of all people might know that.
1625
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:59:35 PM »
Generally, men are more obsessed with their ego, and women care more about reality.
Note my word "generally"
Generally, I think you're full of it. Give me evidence before making such bold claims about 3.4 billion people
1626
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:55:12 PM »
Women would be smart enough to break rules that are designed to give them a disadvantage.
Men would cling to some "honor" bound notion of following the rules until it was too late.
It's amazing how we can all just cast all men and women into some same kinda mindset. women will always cling to wanting to be subjected to men and men will always want to be on top
1627
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:46:46 PM »
Animals killing each other and survival of the fittest are both bad things.
It's only that we as sapient organisms (animals don't know right and wrong) can recognize that.
Going back to the man vs woman thing, sure - the average man could beat the shit out of the average woman. But that doesn't make him "better" and that's not how wars are fought in the first place. In short, this is a dumb thread.
I understand what you're saying. I also wasn't saying men were better. Just superior in that category, whether you think it to be negative or not is not what I'm arguing. And you're right, this thread is dumb, along with its 'what if' scenario (since variables aren't taken into account), but most are. And it's on the Flood, so it's a given.
1628
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:46:02 PM »
Should we augment women to make the same as men?
And have women lose what makes them unique? No. Everyone being the same is boring.
What makes them unique?
Bleeding Idk, what makes men unique? I was going both ways with that.
1629
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:43:36 PM »
Should we augment women to make the same as men?
And have women lose what makes them unique? No. Everyone being the same is boring.
1630
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:43:02 PM »
1631
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:40:22 PM »
Also sorry, but physical strength is not a weakness if you consider how our species came to be and not from a cultural stance. I wouldn't want an entire race being weak ass bitches who can't stand up to predators. Hell in that regard, even women are capable.
"Negative thing" does not mean weakness.
You could just as easily argue that the necessity for physical strength in the first place is also a negative thing, and that the physical strength that men typically possess is symbolic of the shit we probably wouldn't need if the world were a fairer, better place. It's more nuanced than you think.
That's nice. Well get back to me when animals killing each other and survival of the fittest stops existing. You won't find it on this planet. Read my other post if you want my opinion on that. I'm staying basic and to the definition for a reason. Otherwise we could be here all night. Having those kinds of conversations with you, while interesting, is most certainly an effort.
1632
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:39:01 PM »
The fact that you have to exclude anything BUT physical strength (weapons, tactics, subterfuge, etc) from being a factor in this war shows how one-sided an actual gender war would be.
I'm only going on what the OP presented. If we're going into weapons and tactics and all that stuff, that's about as muddled as you can get. Women are smart, they've invented a lot of smart shit, and they know how to shoot guns and form tactics. Just because they're not present on the battlefield or in leadership roles due to the cultural bit I was trying to avoid, doesn't mean they're not mentally capable of such things. Women have led some of the most powerful nations in history at a time.
But that's an entirely different can of worms and will get as murky and subjective as you could possibly think.
I was talking to OP with the "you" comment
Oh. Well my point still stands, and I'm sort of agreeing with you anyway.
1633
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:38:38 PM »
Also sorry, but physical strength is not a weakness if you consider how our species came to be and not from a cultural stance. I wouldn't want an entire race being weak ass bitches who can't stand up to predators. Hell in that regard, even women are capable.
Power is meaningless. Look at my jesus on the cross example from the other thread.
A society that's completely pure and moral, and is so innocent that it has no army isn't "lesser" than the society that pillages and destroys it. It's still better than the warmongering society, even after its destruction.
I'm not going to look at your other thread, nor am I really going to get into an ideological and philosophical debate with you over this. I'm only going on what the OP presented, and on that logic, what I said is 100% true. I don't have time to have some conversation about Utopian societies or the moral values of said things. Talk to Verb or something about it.
1634
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:37:04 PM »
The fact that you have to exclude anything BUT physical strength (weapons, tactics, subterfuge, etc) from being a factor in this war shows how one-sided an actual gender war would be.
I'm only going on what the OP presented. If we're going into weapons and tactics and all that stuff, that's about as muddled as you can get. Women are smart, they've invented a lot of smart shit, and they know how to shoot guns and form tactics. Just because they're not present on the battlefield or in leadership roles due to the cultural bit I was trying to avoid, doesn't mean they're not mentally capable of such things. Women have led some of the most powerful nations in history at a time. But that's an entirely different can of worms and will get as murky and subjective as you could possibly think.
1635
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:35:08 PM »
If you couldn't tell, that argument pisses me off. It's like the people who watch Monogatari because of the "word play". You don't understand a fucking word they're saying, shut up you pretentious cunt.
b-But Luci
Ugh
1636
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:33:50 PM »
Also sorry, but physical strength is not a weakness if you consider how our species came to be and not from a cultural stance. I wouldn't want an entire race being weak ass bitches who can't stand up to predators. Hell in that regard, even women are capable.
1637
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:32:59 PM »
Considering one side is quite literally stronger than the other on a physical level, and have larger skeleton size and bone mass? Men easily.
What Class try and refute this
He won't. He realizes that men are stronger; he just considers physical strength to be a negative thing.
And he has a point. The fact that women generally can't defend themselves against men is probably a bad thing.
In today's world they can now more than ever. Look at it from a glass half full perspective.
1638
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:32:20 PM »
I'm not saying one gender is better than the other as a whole. Just that men are physically more capable due in part by the things I listed. It's not a matter of opinion, that's biological fact. There is a reason our ancestors hunting and running after animals were men and not women.
1639
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:28:49 PM »
Considering one side is quite literally stronger than the other on a physical level due in part by having larger skeleton size and bone/muscle mass? Men easily.
1640
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:23:51 PM »
Disregard anyone who hasn't taken Japanese though that says they know the voice acting is good.
Yelling to a line or two or sounding heart broken doesn't suddenly mean it's "good". Nor can you understand the emphasis on words, nor the pacing nor anything else like you would with the language you interact with every single day.
If you couldn't tell, that argument pisses me off. It's like the people who watch Monogatari because of the "word play". You don't understand a fucking word they're saying, shut up you pretentious cunt.
1641
« on: March 02, 2017, 08:22:55 PM »
whatever is better
I didn't expect this from you, but it's the correct answer.
1642
« on: March 01, 2017, 07:10:38 PM »
 New emote is cute
1643
« on: March 01, 2017, 03:06:32 PM »
Why not both? Life is a balancing act anyway.
1644
« on: February 28, 2017, 05:47:47 PM »
Yes if it depends on what it is. Being aware of things going on in the world is a good thing in general anyway.
1645
« on: February 27, 2017, 06:28:55 PM »
Well that was interesting in the end. Gotta feel for the La La Land cast though, that's rough.
Someone is getting fired.
lmao, how crushed would you feel
that's the shit of nightmares
I'd probably honestly not let them take it away from me or storm out.
1646
« on: February 26, 2017, 11:18:27 PM »
Well that was interesting in the end. Gotta feel for the La La Land cast though, that's rough.
Someone is getting fired.
1647
« on: February 26, 2017, 06:20:50 PM »
I like the art style
1648
« on: February 26, 2017, 06:20:02 PM »
When I saw who won the election for the DNC, I knew the Dems haven't learned from their mistakes and are still run by the old elite men.
At this point I want to feel I identify with the Democratic party, but it's very hard to when I see the same evidence nothing has changed, keep cropping back up. Sanders has tried everything to save them, and called out they'd be fucked by Trump if they went with Clinton.
He was right once, and I wager he'll be right again.
More people identify as Independents now and want to belong to a party, but no party is welcoming to them. If anything, I'd like to see a third party crop up, but I know that would only fracture the Democrats, and without a parliamentary government, they'd have no chance at winning.
1649
« on: February 26, 2017, 11:06:55 AM »
People are sheep
of course they'll be manipulated
1650
« on: February 25, 2017, 10:11:14 PM »
out of date
this is a shameful display
Pages: 1 ... 535455 5657 ... 441
|
Show Posts