1411
Gaming / Re: Made an ESO guild
« on: April 15, 2017, 06:37:44 PM »Death to the dark elvesI think I'm that... Maybe? Idk.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 1411
Gaming / Re: Made an ESO guild« on: April 15, 2017, 06:37:44 PM »Death to the dark elvesI think I'm that... Maybe? Idk. 1412
Gaming / Re: Battlefront 2 leaked« on: April 15, 2017, 05:56:41 PM »
I find it funny how the campaign trailer for Battlefront 2 looks better than Episode 8's. I guess me being a fan of antagonist PoV campaigns always helps, like AC Rogue.
Either way, the trailer left me looking forward to more. Hopefully the gameplay is a bit more in depth than the first. 1413
Gaming / Re: Made an ESO guild« on: April 15, 2017, 05:55:49 PM »
Well nvm, I can DL it now me thinks. I'll add you tonight sometime.
1414
Gaming / Re: Made an ESO guild« on: April 15, 2017, 05:07:48 PM »
I'll probably re-download it later tonight, but I'd have to clear a lot of room.
1415
Gaming / Re: Made an ESO guild« on: April 14, 2017, 10:15:31 PM »
Oh Ender/LC, you have this on PC?
![]() ![]() ![]() Shit, I uninstalled it because NO ONE played it, but I have a few who would play if there were more people, and a guild seems a nice way to actually have to structure. 1416
Serious / Re: Syrian Gas Attack 2017« on: April 13, 2017, 12:12:42 AM »SureSo you want it to be like Libya, with no central government?NoAnd let Isis rule Syria?I like how Trump went from isolationist to neocon in the space of like three days. you're 6 days late so any investment in this conversation has long passed. 1417
Gaming / Re: Battlefront 2 leaked« on: April 12, 2017, 02:08:43 PM »Hopefully it ends up being what the first EA Battlefront should have been, and hopefully the campaign isn't as ass as the Battlefield gamesI'm in the belief that the first Battlefront was more or less a test game. 1418
Gaming / Re: Battlefront 2 leaked« on: April 12, 2017, 02:08:01 PM »Probably because of the pressure of "omg it's just Battlefield but with a Star Wars skin."Battlefield Star Wars Edition 2* They wanted to make it feel different. 1419
Gaming / Re: Battlefront 2 leaked« on: April 11, 2017, 11:16:09 PM »Battlefield Star Wars Edition 2*We've already been over how Battlefront has always been copying the Battlefield formula. They have since the very first game back in 2004. 1420
Gaming / Re: Fallout 4 is based« on: April 08, 2017, 04:21:41 AM »Pretty much the same for me. Fallout 3 was a great introduction to the series in spite of its problems, considering it was basically a messy retelling of a mix of 1 and 2 with varied quality of execution. Fallout 4 doesn't even resemble Fallout aesthetically or tonally.Yeah that's the one thing that reaaaaaaaaaaally made me uncomfortable the whole time with FO4. Aesthetically, it didn't look like Fallout in the slightest. All the signature things were just completely changed, from med-kit boxes, to simple overall designs, and it bugged me. Especially the stupid colorful buildings in Boston when it's been shown in the Fallout universe that buildings are very much tall 50's tier sky scrapers. I don't know, it just rubbed me the wrong way. Tone wise as well, I didn't get any of that oppressive dark tone/humor as well. Only creative thing I'll give it in that regard is the stories they can tell with their environments (things like the skeletons or structural damage, like the ones who died when robbing a bank). Funnily enough, they tell better stories than the actual people do. Anyone remember the whole Nick thing summoning Dog Meat out of nowhere, even when you've never met him before? Yeah. 1421
Gaming / Re: Fallout 4 is based« on: April 08, 2017, 04:18:34 AM »I feel hard-pressed to call Fo4 a bad game when at last check I had 36 days of playtime in it, most of that in the first six months of launch.It's not a bad game It's just not that great a Fallout game aside from the one thing I felt it was ambitious on, which was settlement building. 1422
Gaming / Re: Fallout 4 is based« on: April 08, 2017, 01:40:37 AM »It took me a bit to get into Fallout 1 as well, but once I did I was in love with it.Yeah, it's a bit of an acquired taste. I guess I was used to playing games with weird perspectives when I was younger so when I played FO1 and 2 for the first time last year it wasn't as jarring as it is for most.You use the mouse to move in the isometric games, not WASD.oic 1423
Gaming / Re: Fallout 4 is based« on: April 08, 2017, 01:39:21 AM »
I enjoyed Fallout 3, mainly due to the location (atmosphere), and soundtrack of the game, both ambient and radio. Fallout 3 will always hold a special place in my heart, but that's probably because it was my first one. Still, when revisiting it last year, it still gave me that same feeling it used to before.
but nothing about Fallout 4 captured me Boring location, dumbed down conversations, dumbed down RPG mechanics, and very questionable decisions. It's kinda turned me away from the Fallout series for future games, honestly. Just stick to your Elder Scrolls where you can at least keep a coherent universe together. 1424
The Flood / Re: Panty and Stocking β AKA, why Japan is the worst nation ever« on: April 07, 2017, 08:22:28 PM »You never really shut up do you?does she watch this or somethingit's one of her favorites if i recall correctly 1425
Serious / Re: Syrian Gas Attack 2017« on: April 07, 2017, 02:55:05 PM »
It was mentioned numerous times on TV, but odds are Russia and the US are hashing out shit behind closed doors like with this, and with future stuff, and this whole Russia talking bad is just posturing as mentioned by Psy.
1426
Serious / Re: Syrian Gas Attack 2017« on: April 06, 2017, 10:29:03 PM »
Russia wouldn't nuke anyone unless their territory was under risk anyway. MAD still exists.
1427
Serious / Re: Syrian Gas Attack 2017« on: April 06, 2017, 09:50:28 PM »They "Invaded" Georgia a little over a decade ago; I use parenthesis because I don't count Russia supporting-Georgians opening the gates for Russian tanks to roll through to be an invasion.Not that one either, but yeah, Russia hasn't been this "omg leave us alonebut didn't they invade some nation in the 90's because they wanted to break off with them or something? ![]() 1428
Serious / Re: Syrian Gas Attack 2017« on: April 06, 2017, 09:50:01 PM »
Edit: No wait, you were right. My mistake.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Chechen_War Yeah this. 1429
Serious / Re: Syrian Gas Attack 2017« on: April 06, 2017, 09:49:31 PM »Just turned on the news, one of the news anchors said the Secretary of State said Russia has been incompetent.Yeah, we're gonna have World War 3 start over Syria lol. You guys are way too jumpy. Nothing is gonna happen against the US. Keep in mind Turkey shot down one of their jets and the worst that came was >:I on both sides. 1430
Serious / Re: Syrian Gas Attack 2017« on: April 06, 2017, 09:18:31 PM »I'm pretty sure we'll just stick to bombs. We haven't directly attacked the Syrian's yet, so this would be the first O_O moment. Boots on the ground might be too much though.That's smart, because the last thing you want to do is have some kind of entanglement with Russia and spark a diplomatic crisis like Turkey v Russia.I think he legit wanted better relations with Russia (as every leader coming in has tried), but once he took the office and got unloaded with the info and all the shit that comes with the job, he probably saw how impossible that was. 1431
Serious / Re: Syrian Gas Attack 2017« on: April 06, 2017, 09:17:01 PM »
You bring up a good point. But iirc, someone raised the point to me that even when Russia had collapsed, they've constantly been harassing the border states near them. Forgive my quick reply, multitasking, but didn't they invade some nation in the 90's because they wanted to break off with them or something?
1432
Serious / Re: Syrian Gas Attack 2017« on: April 06, 2017, 09:13:56 PM »That's smart, because the last thing you want to do is have some kind of entanglement with Russia and spark a diplomatic crisis like Turkey v Russia.I think he legit wanted better relations with Russia (as every leader coming in has tried), but once he took the office and got unloaded with the info and all the shit that comes with the job, he probably saw how impossible that was. 1433
Serious / Re: Syrian Gas Attack 2017« on: April 06, 2017, 09:12:27 PM »
Btw, the President can take military action without Congressional approval. It's happened before iirc. They need to really because with how fucking slow Congress is, when you get attacked or need to attack (not talking about this, just in general), do you really expect Congress to vote on something that quickly? And what if they vote it down?
It's a shitty system where the President can do so, and Congress can say they don't support it and not fund it. Problem with that is having the "Not supporting the troops" brand under you when re-running for office, and the primary goal of any elected official is to get re-elected. So it's a catch 22 kinda thing. 1434
Serious / Re: Syrian Gas Attack 2017« on: April 06, 2017, 09:10:12 PM »
I think he legit wanted better relations with Russia (as every leader coming in has tried), but once he took the office and got unloaded with the info and all the shit that comes with the job, he probably saw how impossible that was.
That's just my guess Either way, being president has to be one of the worst jobs in the world. 1435
Serious / Re: Canada considering changing national anthem« on: April 06, 2017, 09:07:57 PM »The US's pledge of allegiance was changed for the times (the addition of "under God" after WWII) so I don't see why not.Gotta make it so those Communists look like they don't believe in gawd. 1436
Serious / Re: Syrian Gas Attack 2017« on: April 06, 2017, 09:05:46 PM »
Or he could be like Obama and say don't cross a line, they cross it anyway, and he doesn't do anything. Or rather, his "actions" aren't as severe as he first made it sound. I understand he worked with Russia to do something.
Sorry, as much as I adore Obama's domestic policy, and him as a person in general, I felt his foreign one was horribly lacking. 1437
Serious / Re: Syrian Gas Attack 2017« on: April 06, 2017, 09:03:35 PM »Presidents have done actions without congressional approval for a long while now. This doesn't really change that. Executive Office has gotten more powerful since FDR.Don't cross the red line and you won't get bombed. 1438
Serious / Re: Syrian Gas Attack 2017« on: April 06, 2017, 09:02:42 PM »
Saying something out of office is indeed very different than when you're in office
especially when they're testing what you'll do as president. Putin kept poking at Obama to see how far he'd go. Trump seems to not have the same leeway. Tbh, I'm glad. Especially after he said it crossed a red line. Had he not said that, maybe, yeah. But when you double/triple down on something Obama used as a term, you gotta do something. I feel like I might be in the minority 1439
Serious / Re: Syrian Gas Attack 2017« on: April 06, 2017, 07:47:45 PM »SMASH THIS MF LIKE BUTTONππππ₯π₯π₯πππππ¦π¦^Started typing this before you had re-replied.Yeah I know. My bad, I coulda swore I hit reply, but it seems I did not. ![]() 1440
Serious / Re: Syrian Gas Attack 2017« on: April 06, 2017, 07:47:12 PM »
Interesting. What mainly caught my eye was the thing where you said people were acting dead then opening their eyes. That's a pretty hefty claim. As for all this, it seems I need to do some more research of my own, which I'll get to this weekend.
Not right now since I just got Persona 5 though, but you've left me intrigued for later. |