This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Winy
Pages: 1 ... 161718 1920 ... 106
511
« on: June 11, 2016, 02:58:47 PM »
I guess Halo 5?
That's really the only game I play nowadays.
512
« on: June 11, 2016, 10:52:41 AM »
Max seems to be drunk.
513
« on: June 10, 2016, 06:31:34 PM »
Science teacher, preferably in the pond of physics and astronomy.
514
« on: June 09, 2016, 07:13:12 PM »
But you suck pretty hard too, man.
515
« on: June 09, 2016, 06:52:27 PM »
 This isn't the body of a steroid user. It's the body of someone who has an absolutely garbage training regimen. And it isn't because he's vegan, it's because he's clearly training like shit and not eating enough.
516
« on: June 09, 2016, 06:50:00 PM »
he also flaunts his steroid swollen body and tries to sit on a noexistant moral high horse. He very clearly doesn't use steroids.
517
« on: June 09, 2016, 06:25:43 PM »
Why do these threads get 7 pages of replies EVERY single fucking time
Mass triggering.
518
« on: June 09, 2016, 04:22:30 PM »
One of these days you're gonna have to realize you make a habit out of doing really stupid things, and stop.
Why do you always like the posts where I criticize what you're doing? Do you acknowledge that the decisions you make are horrible, you just can't be proactive?
I liked all the posts
Not like this is the first time you've done it.
519
« on: June 09, 2016, 02:22:17 PM »
In short, feminism is for one group, ega is for all groups. That simple. Feminism is the advocacy for women, Ega is advocacy for all. I'm really not sure what it is that you're missing here. Feminism is just a description of a set of beliefs that falls under the definition of egalitarianism. Egalitarians believe that everyone should be equal, right? Cool, that's egalitarianism. Feminism is the belief that women should be equal to men, right? Cool, that's feminism. Under the definition of egalitarianism, you believe that women should be equal to men, yes? So you are, by definition, a feminist. It's not possible to be an egalitarian and not subscribe to the idea of feminism.
520
« on: June 09, 2016, 02:10:07 PM »
One of these days you're gonna have to realize you make a habit out of doing really stupid things, and stop.
Why do you always like the posts where I criticize what you're doing? Do you acknowledge that the decisions you make are horrible, you just can't be proactive?
521
« on: June 09, 2016, 01:06:39 PM »
So to say that you're an Egalitarian (Equality for ALL), then say, I'm a feminist (A group that advocates for one group) is contradictory. I didn't bother to read through your entire argument with Verb because I'm feeling pretty lazy, but I think I get the gist of why he's upset with you. Feminism is simply the belief that women should be treated equally to men, which falls under the definition of egalitarianism; that being the belief that everyone should be equal. Just because you don't personally identify with the feminist cause, doesn't mean that you aren't one. What you're arguing is essentially the same as a biologist claiming that they aren't a scientist.
522
« on: June 09, 2016, 12:52:58 PM »
One of these days you're gonna have to realize you make a habit out of doing really stupid things, and stop.
523
« on: June 08, 2016, 11:58:16 PM »
I got a lot of stupid-ass stories I love to tell people.
524
« on: June 08, 2016, 11:47:59 AM »
I don't know, it's not something that I feel comfortable trying to argue a stance on because I really just don't know much about the event and foreign relationships very well. I just go with the official story until it's shown that there's strong evidence to the contrary- And I haven't seen that yet.
525
« on: June 08, 2016, 11:40:44 AM »
You find comfort in the knowledge that you can have most girls, including this one. When that's taken away from you (For example, because she starts dating someone), you're upset. It hurts your own perception of yourself because, finally, you can't have something.
526
« on: June 08, 2016, 12:49:58 AM »
I understand that PC gaming is pretty objectively more extensive and open-ended, but it's too expensive for me. I don't have the interest in gaming that I use to, so I can't be bothered to pay for a gaming PC. It just isn't worth it for me.
527
« on: June 08, 2016, 12:35:51 AM »
Well, I also forgot to mention that it's used as a marketing ploy. It's something to be taken advantage of. Games can't just look interesting or fun on their own merit. Women cannot be interesting on their own merit. At least, according to game designers. And people buy into it.
Yes, it's possible to have an interesting or detailed or strong female character that is still physically attractive.
But what gets advertised more?
What gets exploited more?
What do people buy the games for?
Oh no, I don't disagree with anything that you're saying in regards to feminism and how it wrestles with depictions of girls in video games. I'm more so speaking about your perception of sex at its core. I think girls are sexualized way too much in media and that it's something that isn't doing humanity any good. This is only sort of relevant, but I've never really seen a good opportunity to tell you; If you ever get your hands on an Xbox 360, I'd highly recommend playing Red Dead Redemption. I say that because, on top of the fact that the game is just fantastic from a gameplay and story perspective, I think you'd actually appreciate the female characters in the game more than anything. They're some of the strongest female characters I've ever seen in... Anything, really, and I think the game as a whole is very empowering to women.
528
« on: June 08, 2016, 12:16:37 AM »
I'd argue you're being a little excessive. There are certain aspects of sex and sexuality that negatively affect peoples' perception of each other, and we should be cautious to let sexuality influence our decision-making when rational and morally significant problems are put in front of us. But while it isn't the most useful and wonderful facet of human nature, I don't see any real inconvenience gathered by finding people attractive because of their features and wanting to mess around as a result. I agree that when society has come to prioritize sex above other things, it's a problem, and that's something we should try to ease off of. But to go off on such a massive, hateful rant about the basic concept of two people having sex, to me, is sort of silly.
Sex is "Loathsome and vile" in the same sense that any basic process and nature can be boiled down to something that's either "Disgusting" or excessively complicated. There are underlying and often distasteful ways of representing most natural things, but that doesn't mean that you aren't allowed to enjoy them so long as nobody is being hurt in the process. You can spin those same processes in a different way and end up with something that a lot of people will argue is beautiful and fascinating.
Sure, sex is a bit gross when you get down to what's "Really going on." But the nature of sex, the act of sharing something so intimate and personal with a partner and experiencing that level of pleasure with them, is something that I think is fine. The overarching emotional consequences of having sex with someone you love easily outweigh whatever sort of distaste I think is appropriate to be given towards details of the physical act.
529
« on: June 07, 2016, 01:25:59 PM »
My chemistry teacher told us it was "Octopoda."
530
« on: June 07, 2016, 11:19:36 AM »
Tracer has a nice ass.
Shame she's an absolute bong.
531
« on: June 07, 2016, 10:56:03 AM »
I couldn't care less what I leave behind. Life is for the living, the dead don't need to be remembered.
532
« on: June 07, 2016, 10:53:43 AM »
No, I'm saying that believing that is what makes anti-theism autistic. It's not autistic to acknowledge that religion convinces people to do and believe things that are incorrect, and think "I sort of wish it wasn't a thing anymore." You're autistic if you flaunt your lack of a religion around and act like a pompous ass because of it.
533
« on: June 07, 2016, 01:11:26 AM »
What do you want to leave behind?
534
« on: June 07, 2016, 01:01:06 AM »
This thread was composed my an extraordinary boy with a very special power.
535
« on: June 07, 2016, 12:56:50 AM »
Anybody who thinks that religion is a bad influence and would prefer to have it gone, even if they don't say it, is an anti-theist.
Got it.
OP's still right, though.
Not really. Religion isn't a very good thing and I'm convinced the world would be a better place without it, that doesn't mean I have to be a dick about it.
536
« on: June 07, 2016, 12:42:29 AM »
Because the only people I've ever seen call themselves "anti-theist" are the Dawkins/Hitchens type (the latter, less so, IMO.)
Someone doesn't necessarily have to identify as an "Anti-theist" to be one. It's like how most people are actually feminists, but don't say it because the word "Feminist" carries a negative connotation because of the social justice warrior groups. Anybody who thinks that religion is a bad influence and would prefer to have it gone, even if they don't say it, is an anti-theist.
537
« on: June 07, 2016, 12:31:22 AM »
Anti theism? Never heard of it.
just another type of bigotry
It's not bigotry at all, don't start with this nonsense again. There's a difference between being an anti-theist, and being some prick who runs around and verbally assaults religious people whenever he can. You don't have to act like Dawkins, Hitchens, or any of those guys to be anti-theist.
538
« on: June 06, 2016, 08:32:38 PM »
eventually, it's gonna come to a point where no one is sure if you're even using the word correctly, because it'll become officially synonymous with words like "really" or "very"
To be honest, I think if that was gonna happen, it already would have. They're already pretty interchangeable, but I think most people can pick up on how the word is suppose to be used based on the context.
539
« on: June 06, 2016, 07:27:04 PM »
He's alright, I like what he chooses to talk about, but sometimes his jokes fall a bit flat.
540
« on: June 06, 2016, 06:58:35 PM »
I don't think it's that big of a deal, I find it pretty difficult to notice when people do it. Even in text, I just don't find it all that bad.
Then again, I'm definitely guilty to saying "Literally" when it's probably not necessary, so I'm a bit biased.
Pages: 1 ... 161718 1920 ... 106
|
Show Posts